@buzzlatt

old guy

[Nate Thompson @NateThompson44]

If you’re a Habs fan I’m sure it stings today but let it sink in after a couple days how great your team did being the youngest team in the league. WAY AHEAD of schedule and this will be a constant in the Eastern Conference for years to come. Be excited Habs fans #Gohabsgo

[JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦 @JayGenXer]

❤️‍���� It’s heartbreaking.

Seniors in their 70s and 80s — people who spent their entire working lives paying taxes, building this country, and contributing to the very system they now rely on — still get hit with copays just to get basic care.

Meanwhile, the Liberals opened the floodgates.
Since April 2024 alone, the Interim Federal Health Program for asylum seekers has racked up:
• $23 million for home visits
• $21 million for vision claims
• $343 million for dental
• $169 million for prescriptions
• $77 million for counselling
• $525 million for medical and hospital care

All of it paid for by you and me!!

These newcomers walk in, pay nothing, contribute nothing, and get the royal treatment while the people who actually built Canada are left scraping by.

This isn’t compassion.
This is betrayal.

Seniors who sacrificed for decades get the bill.

The Liberal immigration free-for-all gets the free ride.

Disgusting priorities, WRONG PRIORITIES!
#LiberalFail #CarneyDisaster #cdnpoli #SeniorsFirst #CanadaFirst
🎥 @BenMulroney

[DogTurd™🍁 @DogTurdCanada]

It’d be a real shame if this went super viral.

Share it and share it often.

[Greg Brady @gregbradyx]

EVEN if you make the assumption that politicians will often say things to make opponents look bad….ok, you get to think that. And I won’t talk you out of it / everyone gets an opinion.

BUT, please give the current Carney-appointed Parliamentary Budget Officer 64 seconds of your time. I know it’s the weekend, but please do it.

Liberal-appointed, & his gig is apolitical, neutral, just facts w/ zero political lean. What does he think? The 🇨🇦 economy is headed for the iceberg. No growth. Rocketing unemployment. Staggering deficit & debt.

If you won’t believe me, or the Conservatives, or the NDP (!), believe him. Please share w/ as many of your friends who don’t follow this the same way you do. Thank you. It’s true, it’s as strong a condemnation of a federal government’s fiscal present, & future as I can recall.

[Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱 @ryangerritsen]

The Federal Government felt it was ok to spend $11 billion dollars on gender studies overseas & $4.2 billion dollars on “decarbonizing” the military, but let’s go after Old age security to save money.

[Matt Alexander @RealMattA_]

Remember when Don Cherry said very few newcomers to Canada wore poppies?

I do.

He got fired for speaking some truth.

Further evidence of the systematic spinelessness that is destroying Canada.

Canadians must lose their fear of the sound of truth.

LOST FREEDOM FILES # 1242

[Marc Nixon @MarcNixon24]

Danielle Smith just delivered a historic speech.

Canada unity and hope for the future.

This is in my opinion the best speech I’ve ever heard from a Canadian politician

I’ve cut just the beginning, but left the bulk of the speech. 👏 way to GO @ABDanielleSmith

[Karla Treadway | Host Sovereign Sphere Podcast @thesovereignceo]

Pierre losing his riding legit? More dirty play from the liberals

[Slk55again @slk55again]

✅✅✅✅✅
I worked as an Information Officer, in the Federal Election on April 28, 2025. I was at the - Dr Knox Ecole /School- Polling Station in Kelowna BC from 5:45 AM until 8:30 PM .
I want to put in writing what I witnessed
1- Numerous voters , at least 50%, asked if they could use their pen, that they brought to vote. I said YES.
LATER- after the polls closed, I was then asked to, do the Tally. ( Record the choice of vote on the ballot ) As the Deputy Returning Officer called out the Name of The Candidate selected, I was to record it.
I noticed, None Of the ballots were in Pen. Only pencil. I know for a Fact, I sent most voters, that had a voting card, to desk # 17.
The total of votes tallied at desk #17 were the most of any other desk in the Polling Station. I asked my DRO why none were in pen. No answer offered.
These ballots were then put in an envelope and sealed. My signature is on record as I tallied the total.
2- I noticed many voters turned away that had proper ID. I talked with many to ask why they were refused as these voters were very upset and felt very concerned that they were refused. It turned out that an ENTIRE APARTMENT BUILDING on Valley Road was missing from Elections Canada Information. Meaning none of the residents had voter cards. Without the cards they needed to provide valid ID. Without
PROOF OF The Building Existing, none of the occupants could vote, even with valid Passports, Drivers Licenses, morgage docs, rental agreements, bills ect. It was mindboggling to watch these people turned away. I brought each person to the supervisor to help them vote and the Supervisor said there was nothing they could do without without Election Canada approval.
3- Election Canada was not accessible most of the day. By the afternoon, no supervisor or senior officers could get through for any verification
4- over 60% of voters were under 35 at this location. There were a handful of 70 year old and up. This was remarkable to see such a massive amount of youth. I lost count of how many youth told me it was their 1st Time voting Federally. I asked for stickers or anything to hand out. There was nothing for 1st time voters or children attending with parents.
5-One other Information Officer informed me, his wife was working at the head of Elections Office in the Landmark Building where all the Specail Ballots were. These ballots were done very early and you wrote the Candidate name on the ballot. This was done for weeks. Other specail ballots are the mobile voting and mail in votes, ect. The ballots were not precounted. I spoke with this man after the polls closed and after we tallied to ask if his wife's still counting. He said they did not finish yet and that there was approximately 20,000 ballots. STRANGE that Kelowna called out a winner without that many ballots counted.
6- Many voters spent the day going from Polling Station to Polling Station trying to vote because the Election Canada website was not working so no one could troubleshoot all these oddities with missing voters cards and locations of Polling Stations based on the address of the voters.
7- I can assure all Canadians what I saw in only 1 poll would have a difference in the outcome of this riding. When an entire apartment building is missing, that is not a simple insignificant issue . Hundreds of voters are not counted and that will change the outcome of elections.

My experience is of only 1 poll, in 1 riding, in 1 city, in BC . If it happened here I'm safe to understand it happened in other places. That is one of endless reasons that Elections Canada was not reachable or web sites working for most of the day.

Very clear interference in the Voting Of eligible Voters witnessed today.

MaryAnn Gill

[@buzzlatt @buzzlatt]

@Martyupnorth_2 Northern Ontario?

[🇨🇦MR. Michael @michael_house9]

The math is not mathing for me.

The population of Carleton. The votes “counted”

It’s not adding up. Most of country has low voter turn out BUT Carlton has about 85%

[MarcPatroneShow @MarcPatrone]

What really happened in Poilievre's riding?

Why the huge disparity in votes cast and turnout percentage between Nepean where Carney won and Carleton where Poilievre lost....when both ridings have similar numbers of registered voters

Carleton had 95,813 registered voters

Nepean had 93,728

Votes cast...
83,756 in Carleton

55,963 in Nepean

80 percent turnout in Carleton well above the national average of 67%

Nepean turnout just 59.7%

Does this pass the smell test?

[Dan Knight @DanKnightMMA]

April 29, 2025 —If you were watching the Canadian election from a sane perspective, the outcome doesn’t make a lick of sense. Pierre Poilievre campaigned like a man who wanted to win — and he almost did. He drew thousands to rallies across the country, hammered the failing Trudeau legacy into dust, and offered real solutions for a country buckling under inflation, crime, and a collapsing middle class.

He should have crushed Mark Carney — a lifeless banker installed by the Liberal swamp to keep the grift running.

Instead? The Liberals limped back into power with a minority, and the Conservative movement — though stronger than ever — came up just short.

So what the hell happened?

Two words: Donald Trump.

Let’s be honest — Trump was a political nuclear bomb in this election. Not because Pierre Poilievre embraced him — he didn’t. Poilievre stuck to Canadian issues, refused the bait, and ran a laser-focused campaign. But it didn’t matter. When Trump started talking about tariffs on Canadian goods and even joked about Canada becoming the 51st U.S. state, Ontario voters — particularly the aging boomers in auto manufacturing towns — lost their minds.

They weren’t thinking about freedom, taxes, or restoring Canadian sovereignty. They were thinking about their pensions, their mortgages, and whether their Honda assembly plants would still be open in two years.

Mark Carney seized the opportunity. Suddenly, this nobody globalist who should have been laughed off the debate stage was being portrayed as “the grown-up in the room,” the guy who could “manage” Trump. It was a joke. But fear is powerful, and it worked.

The Trump factor — pure and simple — spooked Ontario and handed Carney the slim margins he needed to survive.

And if that wasn’t enough, Poilievre’s campaign took one unnecessary hit that nobody wants to talk about: the women problem.

Look, when it comes to conservatives and women voters, let's just be honest about it: we're punting from our own end zone every single time. It's not fair, but it’s the reality. Conservatives — especially right-wing conservatives — start at a disadvantage because the culture has rigged the rules of engagement.

And the numbers prove it- Pierre Poilievre ran into a brick wall with women voters — and the numbers prove it. According to a Nanos poll, Poilievre pulled just 29% support among women, five points behind Mark Carney’s 34%. And it was even worse in Ontario, where Carney — a globalist banker dressed up as a “moderate” — beat him by seven points among female voters.

I spent time talking to a lot of women during this Canadian election, and let me tell you, the conversations were revealing. When I asked some of them who they were voting for and why, the answers were shocking — and honestly, kind of hilarious.

One woman told me, straight-faced, that she was voting NDP because they had the best Instagram account out of all the parties.

I'm not making that up.

Not policy. Not economics. Instagram filters.

But not all of it was funny. A lot of the women I spoke to were very serious when it came to Pierre Poilievre and abortion. It came up again and again, especially in suburban mom groups and online communities. It became a huge undercurrent.
Here's the truth, Poilievre, during the campaign, pledged not to ban abortion. Over and over again. He said it clearly: we're not reopening the debate, we're not legislating abortion. It was as clear a position as any conservative leader has ever taken in Canada.

But — and this matters — women, especially liberal-leaning women, didn't believe him. Why? Because of his voting record.

And yes, there’s material there.

Poilievre had previously voted in favor of things like:

Motion 312 (which sought to review when life begins, an obvious nod to pro-life sentiment)

He also supported Bill C-233, which aimed to ban sex-selective abortion (specifically targeting abortions based on gender).

Now, if you're a rational person, you can say:
"Supporting a ban on sex-selective abortion isn't banning abortion itself."
And you’d be right.

But rationality is not the lens these voters are using. The political left framed this as "edging" — suggesting that Poilievre was still dangerous, still harboring secret pro-life intentions.

For a lot of single-issue liberal women voters, that was enough. It didn't matter how many times he said otherwise. It didn't matter how much he reassured them.

The narrative stuck.

And when you have political operatives, activists, and a fully compliant media beating that drum 24/7, it becomes almost impossible to break through.
That’s the real story: Poilievre didn't lose women because he said something offensive during the campaign. He lost them because years ago, he cast votes based on principle — and the modern liberal voter doesn’t give a damn about nuance or context. They want pure allegiance to their causes, no questions asked.

What’s next for the blue wave?

Let’s talk about what comes next for the Conservative Party—because make no mistake, we are now the dominant force in Canadian politics. The numbers don’t lie. Conservatives gained 25 seats in this election. That’s not a shift—it’s a tidal wave. Meanwhile, the NDP lost 18 seats. The Bloc Québécois dropped 9. Even the Liberals, despite clinging to power, only managed to gain a measly 8, and that’s after carpet-bombing the electorate with corporate media spin and taxpayer-funded fearmongering.

So now the Conservative movement stands at a crossroads. Pierre Poilievre, the architect of this comeback, the man who dragged the Conservative brand out of the political wilderness, lost his seat in Carleton. Now ask yourself—does that make sense?
No, it doesn’t. Because the fix was in.

Carleton had 91 candidates on the ballot. That’s not democracy—that’s sabotage. That’s a coordinated effort to confuse the electorate and overwhelm the Conservative base in one of our most high-profile ridings. And while they were pulling that trick, Pierre was out doing what leaders are supposed to do—leading. He was campaigning across the country. Alberta. B.C. Newfoundland. New Brunswick. He was everywhere. He wasn’t padding his own numbers in Carleton—he was working for every single Conservative candidate. And it worked.

We didn’t just gain ground—we made history. Under Poilievre, the Conservative Party saw its biggest seat gain in over a decade. He united the base. He pulled in independents. He brought fiscal common sense back to the national conversation. That’s leadership. And the numbers prove it.

Now let’s talk about Mark Carney—because if Poilievre is the architect of the conservative revival, then Carney is the Liberal establishment’s last hope. Trudeau is done. Finished. The poster child for virtue-signaling globalism stepped aside, and in walks “Carbon Tax Carney,” the unelected banker with a WEF résumé and a smile so polished it belongs in a toothpaste commercial.

Now here’s the thing about Carney: he’s slick. I hate to say it, but he is. When protesters at one of his rallies chanted “WEF! WEF! WEF!”—he didn’t crack. He smirked, cupped his hand to his ear, and joked, “Hold on, they’re giving me orders.” That’s a seasoned operator. And it’s dangerous, because charisma sells—even when it’s wrapped in globalist policy.

But don’t be fooled. Carney isn’t here to change the Liberal Party—he’s here to rebrand the same corrupt apparatus that gave us blackface scandals, carbon tax hikes, and censorship bills. This is Trudeau 2.0—new face, same swamp.

So what now? Poilievre’s out of Parliament—for now. But does that mean he’s lost his position as leader? Not a chance. Let's remember: John A. Macdonald—our first Prime Minister—lost his seat and simply ran in a by-election. This isn’t unprecedented. This is politics.

All it takes is one Conservative MP in a safe riding—maybe someone with a pension and no more to prove—to step aside and let Pierre run again. We clear the runway, he wins the by-election in a walk, and we put him right back where he belongs—on the front lines, crushing Carney with cold, hard facts and a real plan to get Canada back on track.

The Mark Carney factor

Let’s be honest about why Mark Carney is here. He wasn’t dropped in out of nowhere. He was brought in for one reason, and one reason only: to stop Pierre Poilievre.

Because let’s call it what it is—Poilievre ended Justin Trudeau’s political career. Period. The Conservative surge didn’t happen by accident. It wasn’t some economic shift or lucky timing. It was Pierre, day after day, hammering Trudeau on inflation, corruption, censorship, and incompetence—until Trudeau had no cards left to play. The polls turned. The base collapsed. Trudeau folded. He resigned. And he did it because Poilievre made him irrelevant. That’s not just political skill—that’s a strategic kill. And Conservatives should be proud of that.

But here’s the part no one’s talking about: while Pierre was delivering that knockout blow to Trudeau, the Liberals were already scheming. They saw Trump on the horizon, threatening auto tariffs. Now if you’re in Ontario, that’s no small thing. The auto sector is sacred. It props up the middle class, feeds pension funds, keeps entire communities afloat. So when Trump signaled he might bring the hammer down on Canadian manufacturing, the Liberals saw their opening. They panicked. They knew Trudeau couldn’t carry that weight—so they brought in the banker.

Mark Carney. Calm. Corporate. Smooth. The kind of guy who can show up in a suit, whisper “stability” into a microphone, and make retirees feel like their pensions are safe. He was never brought in to “renew” the Liberal Party. He was brought in to shield it—to stand between Poilievre and a voter base the Conservatives were about to run away with.

And for a lot of Ontarians who don’t live and breathe politics, Carney seemed like the adult in the room. He wasn’t yelling. He wasn’t grandstanding. He was the polished bureaucrat saying, “I’ve got this.” It was a play straight out of the globalist handbook—replace the face, keep the system.

But let me say it again: Carney isn’t here to change anything. He’s here to preserve the swamp. He’s here to protect the Laurentian elite, keep the carbon tax grift going, and make sure the same Liberal operatives that ran this country into the ground stay employed.

Final Thoughts: What This All Means for the Conservatives Moving Forward

I was planning to sit down and write a formal article about this, but let’s be honest—sometimes it’s better to just speak plainly. So here it is: Pierre Poilievre should absolutely stay on as leader. He earned it. He gutted Trudeau’s credibility. He broke the Liberal-NDP firewall. He delivered a historic seat gain. And more importantly, he gave the Conservative movement its spine back.

The next six months are going to be brutal—for the Liberals, not the Conservatives. And here’s why: without the NDP holding their hand, the Liberals don’t have cover anymore. I’ve sat through the committee footage. I’ve watched hours—hundreds of hours. The NDP’s role wasn’t opposition, it was obstruction. Anytime a scandal got too close, they shut it down. That’s gone now. The NDP is too weak to play gatekeeper. The Bloc Québécois? They’re not interested in protecting Carney—they want leverage. They’re going to dig for dirt, and they’re going to find it.

So what happens next? The Liberal Party gets exposed. Fully. Committees will get teeth again. Accountability will creep back into Ottawa, and it won’t be pretty for a party that’s gotten used to operating in the dark.

Meanwhile, on the global front, Trump is back in the picture—and if you think Chrystia Freeland is going to stand up to him on tariffs, you’ve been living in a fantasy. These people couldn’t negotiate their way out of a paper bag, let alone hold the line against an America-first trade policy. Carney? Please. His loyalties lie with central banks and Davos—not Windsor autoworkers. The idea that this Liberal crew is going to protect Canada’s manufacturing base is laughable. If you believe that, I’ve got a carbon tax to sell you that’ll single-handedly cool the planet.

What saddens me most is how many Canadians are going to fall for it again. They think Carney is something new. He isn’t. He’s the reboot. The sequel nobody asked for. The swamp didn’t get drained—it just put on a fresh coat of paint.

So here’s where we stand: Poilievre stays. The Conservatives have momentum. They’ve got a strong bench, a sharper message, and a public that’s finally waking up to the fact that the Liberal promise of “sunny ways” was just fog and mirrors. The party needs to stay aggressive. Stay focused. Be the watchdog this country desperately needs.
Because this isn’t over. This is the calm before the political reckoning. And anyone thinking the Liberals are going to lead Canada through it with strength and principle?

You’re about to be very disappointed.

[Terry Glavin 格立文 @TerryGlavin]

Kenney is correct. The core of the Liberal platform was in place well before the Liberal Party arranged Carney's succession.

[SaskLass @SaskLass]

This is what the former LIBERAL party president had to say about Mark Carney

[David Sims-🇨🇦 @DavidSI58]

If you ever had a shred of doubt in your decision to vote for Pierre Poilievre to right this ship we call Canada, watch this 5 minute video and kiss any doubts goodbye.
This could be our last chance. This is the guy we need.
Please vote. 🌊🌊

[Josh Ryan 🍁 @joshryanjames]

Algoma steel worker says none of the people standing behind Carney in this photo actually work at Algoma Steel, nor does he recognize the blue hard hats.

[Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸 @Tablesalt13]

🚨CANADIAN REPORTER IS ALMOST SPEECHLESS AT NEW GOV. of CANADA REPORT

which states that social mobility could be dead by 2040

"This is the most negative report about Canada I have ever read, why isnt it in the media?"

Pierre responds:

[Jonathan Kay @jonkay]

Wow. Under “Corrections and clarifications,” the CBC admits that Rosemary Barton was wrong when she said, during a live April 16 broadcast, that “remains of indigenous children” had been discovered (during the 2021 “unmarked graves” social panic)….

https://t.co/oohCyCiaKr