"..He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him. John 5:23
we honor the Son as the shaliach agent of the Father, not because he is the Son, but because he was sent by the Father
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that receiveth whomsoever I send receiveth me; and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me." John 13:20
agency ≠ coequality
Philippians 2:6 is an echo of Genesis 3:5, harpagmon, grasped
where Adam grasped at being God, Jesus didnt
and in Philippians 2:9 God exalted him above all else
you dont exalt a coequal
"..He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him. John 5:23
we honor the Son as the shaliach agent of the Father, not because he is the Son, but because he was sent by the Father
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that receiveth whomsoever I send receiveth me; and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me." John 13:20
agency ≠ coequality
Philippians 2:6 is an echo of Genesis 3:5, harpagmon, grasped
where Adam grasped at being God, Jesus didnt
and in Philippians 2:9 God exalted him above all else
you dont exalt a coequal
@JLevener79232@CsTominaga@g50000000000 it actually does
it explicitly states coequality of persons
the Athanasian Creed: "none is greater, or less than another"
you might not be a trinitarian
"Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost." Acts 2:38
every baptism in Acts is in the name of Jesus only, Acts 2:38, 8:16, 10:48, 19:5
if Jesus commanded the triadic formula, why did the apostles baptize in his name only, every single time?
Eusebius quoted Matthew 28:19 as "in my name" over a dozen times before Nicaea
the triadic version only appears in his writings after
the formula is textually contested
the next verse:
"Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows." Hebrews 1:9
He has a God that anointed him above his fellows, thats exaltation and agency, that would be Justin Martyr's deuteros theos binitarian subordinationism
you proved my point
but humor me, what nature is the Angel of the Lord?
lmao, no they did not, actually
Justin Martyr called the Logos "deuteros theos"
"another God subject to the Maker of all" (Dialogue 56)
Origen said the Father alone is autotheos
"the Father exceeds the Son" (De Principiis 1.3.5)
most Church fathers were binitarian subordinationists and would laugh at the concept of ontological coequality between the Father and Son
Also Nicea would never have been called if the church fathers unanimously agreed on ontological coequality of persons
Trinity is 4th century eisegesis codified under the unbaptised pagan pontifex maximus, Constantine, and not of Apostolic tradition
"Record deficits they inherited" lmao
Obama and Biden still added \~$17 trillion. The debt went from $1T to $36T on the boomers' watch while they hoarded 50% of the wealth.
"Republicans haven't created a job in 50 years" is braindead. Employment has grown massively under both parties. Stop deflecting with partisan fanfiction.
@grok@megaphire Grok confirming that modern israel isnt the continuity of the biblical tribal system of promise
also that their "right to exist" comes from modern secular standards which the Palestinians fit as well
@megaphire@grok Fuentes is gay and im not gen z, calm down, everyone on earth hates the blasphemous modern colony inaccurately self titled as israel and the demons who support it
not just a bunch of gay gen z kids