Bill

Husband, father, grandfather, uncle; US Navy vet; Artisan baker & miller; a wineskin in the smoke (Psalm 119:83); “If you know, why will you not act?”

[Bill @c14041scr]

What should happen to PA’s no-excuse mail-in ballot law.

[Expose H1B Fraud @JobsNowPaper]

BREAKING: Rochester General Hospital in New York hired 82 resident doctors.

80 are foreign workers on H-1B or J-1 visas.
Only 2 are Americans.

98% of the residency slots went to visa workers- mostly from countries with documented USMLE cheating.

Americans got 2 jobs.

[Robert W Malone, MD @RWMaloneMD]

In the USA, almost no senators show up for Ron Johnson's hearings on vaccine injury either.
They don't want to know that harms that they have caused.
Cures + PREP Act + Project BioShield + PAHPA/PAHPRA + BARDA + EUA law

[Deep Leaks @DeepLeaksHQ]

🔥 NEW STUNNING ADMISSION in Georgia Election Certification Controversy. TOTAL MEDIA SILENCE. 🔥

This broke this week and most Americans still haven’t heard a word about it 👇

• Fulton County ADMITS it certified 315,000 early votes WITHOUT required poll-worker signatures
• That means the votes were certified ILLEGALLY
• Ballots were never legally verified as required by Georgia law
• A mandatory safeguard was skipped - then approved anyway

Americans were mocked and shamed for asking questions.
Now officials are forced to admit: those questions were valid.

🚨 It gets worse for Fulton County
• A Fulton County judge kept subpoenas ALIVE seeking access to the 2020 ballots

Yet the national media is silent, because covering this means admitting they helped silence legitimate concerns about election integrity.

This is NOT:
❌ speculation
❌ rumor
❌ a recycled claim

This is a NEW admission, on the record, in court filings, confirmed by county attorneys.

⚠️ Even Georgia officials admit Fulton County violated official election processes.

Why does this matter?

• Poll-worker signatures are not cosmetic
• They verify machines were properly opened, closed, and reconciled
• When signatures are missing, verification is broken

Officials say it was “procedural.”
But procedures ARE the safeguard.

Georgia later “hand-counted” ballots...
➡️ but now admits they counted UNCERTIFIED ballots
➡️ counting later does NOT cure an illegal certification

📊 Remember the margin
• Georgia decided by 11,779 votes
• The results flipped TWO U.S. Senate seats
• Republicans lost Senate control
• Washington shifted to a full Democratic trifecta

This isn’t about relitigating the past.
It’s about right now.

If election law violations can be admitted years later with:
• no investigation
• no consequences
• no reform

👉 what does that signal heading into the next election?

And THIS is why the media won’t touch it.

For years:
• questioning election integrity was punished
• citizens were censored
• journalists lost careers
• January 6 defendants got decades
• Trump allies were financially destroyed
• even a President was targeted

All for questioning a process now openly admitted to have violated the law.

So here’s the question they still refuse to ask:

❓ What REALLY happened in the election of 2020?

This was never just about President Trump.
It was (and still is) about the American voter.

When legally required safeguards are skipped, the injury is constitutional.

The injured party is YOU - and you’re owed a remedy.

That remedy starts with:
✔️ a full, transparent investigation
✔️ accountability
✔️ lawful redress

🇺🇸 The truth doesn’t expire.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 BREAKING: ActBlue cofounder Matt DeBergalis just PANICKED and PLEADED THE 5TH in a closed-door deposition with House committee investigators — Fox News

This comes after ActBlue is accused of allowing FOREIGN DONATIONS that INFILTRATE US politics for Democrats, without proper measures to stop it

Here's the shocking exchange between Rep. Jim Jordan and an ActBlue official when they also pleaded the 5th. SHUT IT DOWN.

JORDAN: Your board chairman said ActBlue accepted up to 38 million contributions in 2024 that had the signs of foreign origin. How much fraud is too much fraud?

ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.

JORDAN: How many foreign contributions did ActBlue accept?

ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.

JORDAN: How much money did ActBlue accept from Russia?

ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.

JORDAN: Why did your entire legal team quit? Your in-house legal team?

ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.

JORDAN: Did your legal team quit because of reduced fraud standards?

ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.

JORDAN: We won't keep you here all day, but let me just do one more. Did you weaken your fraud standards to help Democrats?

ACTBLUE: On the advice of counsel, I respectfully declined to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution.

[The SCIF @TheSCIF]

BREAKING: President Trump hints at declaring a National Emergency to pass The SAVE America Act!

This is a national emergency because it has to do with our national security, dealing with one of our most sacred rights. The right to vote to install a leader of our country.

If we don't have secure elections, we don't have a country.

"Stranger things have happened, we'll leave it at that."

- President Donald J. Trump

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

WOAH 🚨 Secretary of State Marco Rubio CONFIRMS they have evidence that the mass protesters that come out for different protests like Anti-ICE, pro-Hamas and even the 2020 protests ARE ALL THE SAME PROTEST GROUPS

“There's nothing organic about it. It is funded, it is organized.” They just remake signs for each different protest

“They were the same people you saw on the streets burning things in 2020. They then flip it around and they become the pro-Hamas protesters, then they flip it around and within 48 hours of Maduro's arrest have pre-printed signs outside the courthouse demanding his release. Then they're out there doing the ICE stuff, attacking ICE agents.

There's nothing organic about it. It is funded, it is organized, and Cuba is a part of that network, and in some cases, a critical part of that network, and it's a network they will weaponize against us. And they talk about it openly, about how they will use that network to pressure American policymakers, not just here in the United States like Code Pink, but all over the world”

Here are just a few of the groups involved in the mass protest network. It’s so much bigger and organized than people realize

All of them should be arrested for intentionally setting up mass protests:

- Code Pink (CODEPINK)
- The People’s Forum
- National Network on Cuba
- ANSWER Coalition
- BreakThrough News
- Tricontinental Institute (Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research)
- National Lawyers Guild
- Pastors for Peace / IFCO
- Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)
- Black Alliance for Peace
- ICAP (Cuban Institute of Friendship with the Peoples)
- Venceremos Brigade (historical)
- Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL)
- Workers World Party
- Freedom Road Socialist Organization

You should recognize a lot of these names because everything we have mass protests they are always filming and posting to platforms like Facebook

Now you know why they’re filming and posting. They’re literally paying for the protests and organizing them

[Joe6Pack @joe6_pack]

It’s taken a steady agenda since the end of WWII. They slowly march through the institutions while Americans turned their heads.
Our children brainwashed through academia for the last three generations.
All the dominos setup to start falling at the same time. The 2020 Agenda and now the 2030 agenda was determined arbitrarily, but it was set after years of planning and execution.
Our government sold us out a long time ago.

[FreedomFightersDaughter🇺🇸 @FrdmFghtrskid]

@GadSaad @Mrs4God_Country Your daily reminder that Islam
Does not assimilate 👇👇👇

[GRANDPA’s FREE ADVICE @GOP_is_Gutless]

🔥 THEY SAID IT NEVER HAPPENS… UNTIL IT DID 🔥

CNN panel. Bush White House spokesman Pete Seat sits three feet from Obama strategist David Axelrod and drops the truth: “Barack Obama got on the 2008 Indiana primary ballot because Democrats in St. Joseph County submitted FRAUDULENT petition signatures. People — including the county Democratic chair — went to JAIL over it. He shouldn’t have been on that ballot.”

Axelrod freezes: “How did that get determined?”

Seat: “It was exposed two years later. Went through the courts. People went to jail.”

FACT CHECK: 100% TRUE ✅

In 2013, four Indiana Democrats were convicted for forging those signatures — literally copying names off old petitions. Even a former governor’s name was forged.

County Democratic Chairman Butch Morgan went to prison for orchestrating it.

The thing they swore “never happens”… happened.

And a party chairman did hard time for it.

Election fraud isn’t a conspiracy theory.

It’s a documented crime.

Share this before they memory-hole it.
#ElectionFraud #Obama #Indiana #VoterFraud #CNN

[Health_Is_Wealth @mcgillmedicines]

IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION

1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day).

LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day
**Best for:**
- Cancers in remission
- Strong family history or genetic predisposition
- Prophylaxis (preventive)
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished.

MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.).
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9.

HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers).
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared.

VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers.
**Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days).
**Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported.

**Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):**
- Low: ≤30 mg/day
- Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid)
- High: 120 mg/day
- Very High: ≥150 mg/day

Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses vary.

Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have pre-existing conditions (e.g., vision issues or glaucoma). This is for educational purposes only.

Share to spread awareness — information. Follow for more .

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

The LARGEST human study on Ivermectin + Mebendazole for cancer is now peer-reviewed and published in a major oncology journal.

84.4% of patients reported COMPLETE REMISSION, TUMOR SHRINKAGE, or HALTED TUMOR GROWTH.

Patients took 25 mg Ivermectin and 250 mg Mebendazole. After 6 months, patients had an 84.4% Clinical Benefit Ratio (CBR)—meaning more than four out of five patients reported either:
No evidence of disease (32.8%)
Tumor regression (15.6%)
Cancer stabilization (36.1%)

Cheap. Off-patent. Widely available.

Yet for years it was viciously attacked, censored, and ridiculed as “horse paste” while millions died from cancer — and the industry made trillions pushing toxic chemo and lifelong “treatments.”

This wasn’t an accident.

They don’t want cures.
They want customers.

The dam has broken and the suppression is being exposed.

[Del Bigtree @delbigtree]

I asked Professor Angus Dalgleish (Professor of Oncology at St. George's University of London and one of the world's leading cancer immunologists) whether he believed the COVID vaccine was creating turbo cancers. He said yes, and that after reviewing over 400 publications on the subject the mechanisms are so numerous it's surprising there aren't more cases than we're already seeing.

He walked me through several of them. The vaccine suppresses T-cell response and switches the antibody system into a tolerant state, essentially converting the body into a condition similar to transplant readiness, where it won't reject a foreign organ and won't reject a cancer. It can integrate into the genome next to oncogenes. The Pfizer vaccine contains SV40, a known oncogene. It interferes with dozens of metabolic and signaling pathways that, when overstimulated, drive cancer and don't switch off.

The mechanism that concerns him most is the vaccine's ability to bind and silence tumor suppressor genes like p53 and BRCA. If someone already carries a natural mutation in one of those genes, their cancer arrives 20 or 30 years earlier than it otherwise would have. Interfere with more than two or three of these pathways simultaneously and you pull it forward even further, and when the cancer does arrive, the brakes are gone.

In nearly 40 years he said he's never seen anything like the presentations he's seeing now.

He said we should ban all mRNA vaccines, because they aren't vaccines, they're gene therapies, and giving them to children can interfere with their genome for the rest of their lives. He called allowing these products to go into young people, when we knew none of them were at risk of dying, criminal medical negligence and the crime of the century.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Le WEF, un projet capitaliste ? C'est précisément l'inverse.

Comme le « progressisme » est un anti-progrès. Comme l'« antiracisme » est devenu un racisme. Le WEF est un projet profondément anti-économique.

On confond capitalisme et présence de milliardaires. Mais le capitalisme, ce n'est pas « des gens riches existent ». C'est un processus : l'échange libre, les prix qui transmettent l'information, la concurrence, l'entrepreneur qui risque SON capital, le consommateur souverain qui tranche.

Davos propose l'exact opposé. Une économie administrée par une caste de technocrates que personne n'a élus. La concurrence remplacée par des cartels de « parties prenantes ». Le profit-et-perte — seul signal qui dit le réel — remplacé par des scores ESG décrétés d'en haut. Ce n'est pas le marché. C'est de la planification, repeinte aux couleurs du privé.

Et le slogan ? « Vous ne posséderez rien et vous serez heureux. »

L'abolition de la propriété privée, c'est la définition littérale du communisme. Marx ne disait rien d'autre. Un projet dont l'horizon est de te déposséder ne peut pas, par construction, être capitaliste.

Reste l'outillage. L'euro numérique : une monnaie programmable, donc conditionnable, restreignable, périssable à distance. Le DSA : le contrôle de ce que tu as le droit de dire. Chat Control : la surveillance de tes messages privés.

Hayek l'avait écrit : la planification centrale finit toujours par exiger le contrôle de l'information, puis celui de l'individu. La Route de la servitude, version 2.0.

Mets tout bout à bout : une société sans propriété, sans concurrence, sous surveillance financière et informationnelle totale, pilotée par une élite à qui tu n'as jamais rien délégué.

Ça porte un nom. Et ce n'est pas « capitalisme ».

WEF + UE, c'est un projet collectiviste à l'esthétique orwellienne. Le costume capitaliste, c'est exactement ça, le tour de passe-passe.

[Gunther Eagleman™ @GuntherEagleman]

Members of the Supreme Court continue to show us their true colors!

I’m so sick of Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts. Are you serving America and the Constitution, or your own interpretation of the law?

I honestly don’t get it.

HUGE DISAPPOINTMENT.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 JUST IN: Mass outrage is erupting against SCOTUS Justice Amy Coney Barrett after she decided to uphold mail-in ballot “election month” rather than reinforce an ELECTION DAY nationwide

A serious disappointing moment for her.

ONLY PROVES WE NEED THE SAVE AMERICA ACT

They did NOT block Congress from changing it.

So get it done for the republic, Senate GOP! 🇺🇸

[Rand Paul @RandPaul]

I have re-referred Anthony Fauci to the DOJ for prosecution. The evidence is clear. He funded dangerous research, knew the likely origin of COVID as early as January 2020, and spent years lying to Congress and the American people.

15 million people are dead. Justice demands accountability. @MariaBartiromo

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

HOLY CRAP

Over a million people are on Obamacare with no Social Security Number

The thing that Democrats claim never happens is happening at massive scale

This is why Democrats hate DOGE

Their money laundering fraud ring was exposed

[Bill Mitchell @mitchellvii]

ALITO'S DISSENT ON MAIL-IN BALLOTS IS A MASTERPIECE AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT

While the mainstream media is busy celebrating today's ruling, four justices stood in the breach and said what every honest American already knows. Alito's dissent in Watson v. RNC is not just a legal argument. It is a warning shot about where this country is headed if we do not get serious about election integrity.

Read these words carefully.

Alito wrote that when thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. That is a sitting Supreme Court Justice, in an official dissent, validating what the corporate media has spent four years calling a conspiracy theory.

He went further.

Alito cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. Not a talking point. Not a campaign slogan. Peer reviewed research cited in a Supreme Court dissent. The problem is real, it is documented, and five justices just decided to ignore it.

On fraud, Alito was surgical.

He pointed out that as far back as 2005, a commission chaired by Jimmy Carter and James Baker concluded that absentee voting was the largest source of potential voter fraud in American elections. Jimmy Carter. The left canonizes that man. His own commission said mail-in ballots are the biggest fraud vulnerability we have. And today's majority just threw the door open wider.

Then Alito did something remarkable.

He painted a picture of exactly what this ruling could produce. A close presidential election. One state still counting. The leading candidate watching his margin shrink day after day as new batches of mail-in ballots arrive. The lead flipping with days to spare before electors must cast their votes. He was not writing fiction. He was describing something we have already watched happen in slow motion in race after race since 2020.

He also torched the majority's logic directly.

Barrett and Roberts argued that the word election in federal law only governs when voters CAST their ballots, not when officials RECEIVE them. Alito called this what it is. The electorate's choice is not complete, he argued, until all the ballots have been collected and the decision is fixed. A ballot sitting in a mail truck three days after Election Day is not a completed act of voting. It is an open question. And open questions are where fraud lives.

He also raised something nobody else is talking about.

What is the limiting principle here? If states can accept ballots five days late, can they accept them twenty-one days late? Washington State already does. Can a state eliminate receipt deadlines entirely? Alito asked that question directly and the majority gave no answer. They opened a door and refused to say how far it swings.

Thomas and Gorsuch stood with Alito completely. Kavanaugh joined most of it.
And Barrett, the justice we were told would hold the line, wrote the opinion that Alito was dissenting against.

History will not be kind to this decision. But it may be very kind to this dissent. The greatest dissents in Supreme Court history are often the ones that turn out to be right. Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch put it on the record today.

The question is what we do with it.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

Sen. Ashley Moody exposed Dr Anthony Fauci for all of his lies:

The pandemic was fake.
The tests were fake.
The mask science was fake.
The social distancing was fake.
The vaccine science was fake.
The news was fake.
It was all fake.

[Bill @c14041scr]

Perhaps the govt can claw back the trillions and cancel income tax.

And while they’re at it, make good on the IOUs that were used to raid social security.