Carol Caul

Seeking justice. No dms or calls. Thanks.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

🤚🤚 Do the State also. Their voting procedures are made for voting fraud. Given their procedures, there is nothing that could be done to eliminate the corruption of this election. CA Sec of State says everything complies with rules. 1. That is not true. 2. Rules are fatally flawed.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@LibertyNut1 A. YES. And vote the elected ones out of office.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@elonmusk Heartstopping, beautiful, and very, very impressive.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@RightScopee 👍👍 Total rip-off; shameless lack of concern for voting integrity. This state procedure is a Voting Rights Act civil rights violation. Hope Harmeet will want to investigate.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@ElonMuskkk93 Followed.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@WallStreetApes This is the kind of thing you get with hand counting and hand voting.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@WellsJorda89710 @AAGDhillon Thank you. We need an audit of the processes, perhaps starting with ballot harvesting; but there are a number of processes that should be reviewed.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@ConstitustionX Ballot harvesting, mail in ballots, hand counting, single ballot counters who can count how they wish, slow workers and lazy work hours, all made for massive election fraud in violation of Voting Rights Act and First Amendment.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@ConstitustionX Ballot harvesting actions--numbers and timelines--make California elections a fraud and a First Amendment tragedy.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@elonmusk Falcon 9 & Starlink: an excellent duo all around.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

#COALFIREDPOWERPLANTS #EPARULEMAKINGS #CCRandRECLAMATION
EPA PROPOSES REVISIONS TO FEDERAL WASTEWATER AND COAL ASH REGULATIONS
Newsletter Posted on June 1, 2026
Comments on both proposals are due Jun 12 2026
(If you wish to submit comments, you can navigate to the EPA Rule page, which will have the docket number and links to all comments filed for the proposal if you wish to pick up ideas or clarify these technical regs.)

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently proposed two major revisions to federal environmental regulations affecting coal-fired power plants, signaling a significant shift in federal policy and a broader effort to support continued coal-based electricity generation. The proposed changes, announced in a pair of rulemakings in April and May 2026, will revise portions of the 2024 Effluent Limitations Guidelines and the Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) rules that had imposed stricter treatment and disposal requirements on utilities.

EPA Moves to Ax Requirement that Coal Plants Treat Toxic Wastewater Seeping into Lakes and Rivers
EPA proposes to rollback requirements on the amount of arsenic and mercury that coal power plants are allowed to discharge

COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS (CCR). 2026 Proposed Amendments to the Coal Combustion Residuals Regulations https://t.co/Pg7pOs8O0P

CCR Rule Summary
On April 9, 2026, EPA announced a proposal to amend several provisions of the federal regulations governing the disposal of CCR in landfills and surface impoundments and the beneficial use for CCR in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations in Part 257.

Coal combustion residuals (CCR) can be used in different products and materials. CCR can be beneficially used to replace virgin materials removed from the earth, conserving natural resources.

EPA encourages the beneficial use of CCR in an appropriate and protective manner because this practice can produce environmental, economic, and product benefits such as:
**reduced use of virgin resources.
**reduced cost of coal combustion residuals disposal.
**improved strength and durability of materials.

Coal surface mining reclamation ties in directly with EPA disposal rules when operators use "minefilling"—the practice of placing toxic coal ash or Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from power plants back into active or abandoned mine voids. This couples land reclamation goals with federal waste and water protection standards.

On April 9, 2026, EPA announced a proposal to revise the definition of beneficial use, add a definition of CCR storage pile, and exclude specific beneficial uses from the federal CCR regulations.
While the beneficial use of coal combustion residuals has these potential benefits, the environmental impacts associated with their use should also be considered.

Cite: An EPA Proposed Rule by the Environmental Protection Agency on 04/13/2026
https://t.co/0mtzcFFN8a

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@ElonMuskgxuy @elonmusk Thanks. I qualify for and am going to go through Fidelity. Will sign up to request shares as soon as I can wade through the guide.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@america Why? Was it because the 4 did not want it as part of a budget reconciliation act. That kind of thinking is far too formalistic given our problem. I tend to support Collins, so she had better have a good reason for this: not belonging on budget reconciliation is not good enough.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@greenery897 A. and B.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@FreeVoice023 A) YES, or if the judges are elected, vote them out of office.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@LibertyNut1 C) Carbon

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@_VoiceofAmerica None of above: supporters are supposed to give Elon stuff, not take stuff from Elon, although that Ticket to Mars sounds enticing.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@ScenarioOfElon A. Full support 🤚

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

@WHLeavitt Deport radicals: Yes. We need to give others more careful scrutiny and deference, especially if they entered the country lawfully and are attempting to integrate.

[Carol Caul @c_caul]

It has become a wide-spread, cruel, stupid, and inhumane fad to exercise power and authority over anyone you choose to hurl the epithet of racism against. Those who punish the ones they have thrown the label of racist on are a target. Until this if forced to stop, no one can protect these falsely labeled persons.