Christine Jacomb

[Alastair Hilton @London_W4]

It’s almost as if when you import the third world, you become the third world. Who’d have thought that importing savages would result in people getting their head cut off in public, thousands of girls getting raped and others getting stabbed and deliberately run down by cars and vans. But let’s just keep importing the third world because, um, racism.

[Dr Philip Kiszely @KiszelyPhilip]

A year before 7/7 I was stabbed, beaten and left for dead on a street in Manchester. It was a gang of Somali youths. My colleagues - I was working at a university - couldn’t bring themselves to blame the perpetrators. It was poverty, it was me, it was anything. But it wasn’t the masked thugs with stanley knives.

7/7 was the same. London Mayor Ken Livingstone urged us not to apportion blame. Even now the MSM refuses to acknowledge the Islamist nature of the crime. It’s an extraordinary state of affairs.

Years later, in 2017, when twenty-two people, some of them children, were killed in the Manchester Arena attack, history repeated itself. Don’t look back in anger. One Love. Shit poetry.

The stabbing I got over. But it took me years to come to terms with the pathetic reaction from the hand-wringing identitarians. That was really, really damaging. So I understand full well the harm we do to ourselves when we pretend 7/7 was some bizarre and contextless tragedy.

It was Islamist terror - and there’s more to come.

And you know what? We have absolutely no hope of effectively dealing with it.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

.@Keir_Starmer, your statement says you have absolutely no tolerance for abhorrent scenes of violence like this on our streets.

With respect, tolerance is not the issue. Nobody tolerates a near beheading on a residential street in Belfast. The question your statement carefully avoids is prevention. And prevention requires honesty about a pattern your government has consistently refused to name.

A man in his thirties, a Somali national, pinned a man to the ground on a residential street and stabbed him repeatedly in the face and neck. Members of the public intervened with a hurling stick. A woman required hospital treatment for the stress of witnessing it. This happened in Northern Ireland, a place that has known more than its share of violence, and even there residents said they had never seen anything like it.

Your government has presided over record small boat crossings. It has failed to proscribe the IRGC despite repeated promises. It has blocked the grooming gang inquiry for a year before being forced to concede it. It has spent £10 billion on asylum accommodation contracts. It has actively resisted measures that would have reduced the number of unvetted individuals entering and remaining in this country.

The victims of these attacks are not statistics. They are British people, going about their lives on their own streets, who were failed before the attack happened. Failed at the border. Failed by a system that prioritises the rights of those who arrive illegally over the safety of those who were already here.

Your thoughts are with the victim. So are ours. The difference is that thoughts are not policy. Thoughts do not secure borders. Thoughts do not remove individuals with no right to be here. Thoughts do not protect the next victim, whose name we do not yet know, on a street we cannot yet identify, from an attack that has not yet happened.

How many more before the thoughts become action?

[Rafe Heydel-Mankoo @RafHM]

The Bank of England DELIBERATELY FIXED the fake "public vote" to remove ALL historical figures from bank notes & replace them with nature images

Freedom of Information requests by the Telegraph reveal the decision to remove historical figures was based on a "focus group" of a mere 119 people

The Bank LIED because it previously claimed the decision was based on a "public vote".

In truth, however, even this vote was FIXED. Instead of having HISTORY v NATURE, the bank deliberately split the "history" category into 3 sections: historical events, historical figures, architecture & landmarks.

That was the only way that "nature" could win.

However, of course bank notes always combine at least two of those history categories. For example: Churchill & Parliament or Wellington & Waterloo.

The Bank's actions are indefensible and questions should be asked in the House.

The Bank of England has clearly been captured by progressive woke ideology. A visit to the Bank of England with its permanent exhibition on slavery makes that clear

This is part of the wider war on British history. It's an attempt to create a NEW BRITAIN, based on ridiculous myths that "Diversity Built Britain" and that Britain has always been multicultural.

Remember: the Bank of England issued a 50p coin (held aloft by Rishi Sunak) which was imprinted with the nonsensical statement: "Diversity Built Britain"

Anyone who lived behind the Iron Curtain will find all of this eerily and scarily familiar.

The pulling down of statues, the renaming of streets and schools, the rewriting of history, denigrating heroes, changing bank notes etc....these were all tactics of the communists.

Severing the connection between a people and their history is the best way to demoralise a society and prepare them for the imposition of new myths.

Me on @GBNews:

[Toby Young @toadmeister]

North Yorkshire Police made a grovelling public apology to "our LGBTQ+ communities" – but has refused to apologise to a Christian officer it wrongly sacked for asking a question about Islam at a training day. https://t.co/ghWPzWTZ3r

[Christine Jacomb @caj987]

Why can we rage against George Floyd’s death but not Henry Nowak’s? https://t.co/NvMQlNxnNU

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

.@EdwardJDavey You speak of threats to British democracy. Here's one that doesn't feature in your framing. In Bournemouth, a constituency governed by a Liberal Democrat controlled council, three taxpayer funded asylum hotels have produced 116 criminal charges against 51 residents. A young woman, Cleo Lake, was punched unconscious for rejecting a man's advances. A nineteen year old was raped in a portable toilet on the seafront. A Somali asylum seeker told a police officer when I kill someone here, you come for me after avoiding jail three times. Your party opposes every enforcement measure that would empty those hotels. Your biggest election donor in 2024 made his fortune running a company that provided a quarter of all Home Office asylum accommodation before it was stripped of its contract for substandard performance. The threat to British women walking home at night in Bournemouth is considerably more immediate than Elon Musk's posts on X. But it doesn't feature in your framing because it doesn't fit the narrative.

"Cleo Lake was punched unconscious for rejecting a man's advances."

[Catherine Blaiklock @blaiklockBP]

Part of my second pre-action letter to Tiffin Sandwiches based in Bradford who are selling unlabelled Halal sandwiches to the general public.

3. The Legal Position — Your Analysis Misses the Point Entirely

Your response focuses on labelling law. That is not the primary basis of this claim. The primary wrong is this: an animal was slaughtered under a religious exemption that only permits such slaughter for the food of Muslims, and the product was then sold to a non-Muslim.
(a) The Slaughter of Animals Act 1933 — The Core Issue
The Slaughter of Animals Act 1933 introduced the religious slaughter exemption in deliberate and specific terms. The exemption applies to animals slaughtered "by the Mohammedan method for the food of Mohammedans." Those words are not incidental. They define and limit the scope of the exemption entirely. The religious slaughter exemption exists to serve a religious community. It was never enacted as a general licence to slaughter animals by religious methods and sell the product to the general public — including non-Muslims who actively object to this practice.

I am not a Muslim. I did not consent to purchasing meat slaughtered under a religious rite. The sale of this product to me was therefore not within the scope of the statutory exemption under which the animal was slaughtered. This raises a serious question of law as to whether the slaughter itself — and the sale to a non-Muslim consumer — was lawful.

This is not a fringe argument. It is a straightforward matter of statutory interpretation: the exemption says what it says, and it does not say that halal-slaughtered meat may be sold to the general public without restriction.

(b) Protected Beliefs — Equality Act 2010 and Article 9 ECHR
Opposition to non-stun slaughter on grounds of animal welfare and conscience is a protected belief. The Employment Tribunal has so held in Hashman v Milton Park (Dorset) Ltd [2011], where a belief in the sanctity of life including that of animals was found to be a protected philosophical belief under the Equality Act, and in Casamitjana Costa v The League Against Cruel Sports [2020], where ethical veganism and objection to practices causing animal suffering were found to constitute a protected philosophical belief.

The same principle extends to a sincere belief in animal welfare at the point of slaughter, and to a Christian objection to the manner in which an animal is killed.

Many Christians hold that the method of an animal's death is a matter of moral and conscientious significance. I was caused genuine distress upon discovering I had consumed meat produced in a manner I find morally objectionable. That distress is recognised and protected under Article 9 ECHR and the Equality Act 2010.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 WOW! JD Vance just broke it down PERFECTLY for patriots in the West rising up against 3rd world migration, BUCKING Keir Starmer calling it "far-right"

"To everybody in the UK who rejects [3rd world migration], I'd encourage them to just KEEP ON GOING! It's OK to want to defend your culture!" 🔥

"All over the West is this idea that the way to generate prosperity is to bring in MILLIONS and millions of unvetted people and DROP them into your neighborhoods — and we simply reject that idea!"

"It's OK to want to live in a safe neighborhood. It's okay to want your job to go to yourself and your neighbors and not to a stranger who you don't even know."

"It is reasonable for the people in Western societies to want to control who comes into their country and who doesn't."

"A lot of people, frankly, a lot of people in the media have tried to persuade all of those people that it's somehow racist to want to protect your borders..."

"...even though very often the very people who are most affected by low wage immigration are lower income black and Hispanic Americans right here in the United States of America, and I guarantee that's true in the UK."

"So we believe in making America great again. You can't do that unless you protect your borders. I'd encourage our friends in the UK to follow the same path."

🇺🇸🇬🇧 AWESOME!

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

“To be honest I feel like I am unwillingly in an abusing coercive controlling relationship with the Australian government & I want out of it… I think it is fitting that ‘Giggle v Tickle’ has made Australia the laughing stock of the world.”

[Chris Rose @ArchRose90]

A black woman who spoke to @RebelNewsOnline at the Unite The Kingdom march, told them that she was in the RAF for 12 years.

She attended the march because she recognises the cultural decay & has noticed that parts of the UK are unrecognisable.

@Keir_Starmer is she “far-right”?

[Rebecca Paul MP @Rebecca_SPaul]

The Government has released their response to the @CommonsWEC report on discrimination and abuse of Muslim women.

They haven’t addressed little girls forced to wear headscarves in school, first cousin marriage, sharia courts or FGM.

Epic fail.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Muslims electing Muslims exactly because they’re Muslims - they then govern as Muslims, for Muslims. Demographic changes, birth rates and mass immigration mean that this is going to accelerate, rapidly.

What is our country going to look like in fifty years? Twenty years? Ten years? Honestly, think about that.

On current projections, Britain has an Islamic future.

That is just a fact. I don’t like it, in fact it terrifies me, but it’s true.

I do not want my grandchildren’s children to grow up in a Muslim Britain.

Tower Hamlets. Rochdale. Birmingham. Luton. Blackburn. Large parts of London. I could go on.

A sectarian nightmare. Deep divisions across the community in parts of those towns, in others it’s entirely united - united by Islam.

That is our future.

Unless we act, unless we organise, unless we vote.

There is still time.

Restore Britain is the only serious political party that has the courage to stand up for a Christian Britain.

We are the only political party with the courage to do what is necessary.

Mass immigration from Islamic countries will end, day one.

Banning halal slaughter, cousin marriage, the burqa/niqab.

Dominating Islamic prayer will be outlawed, along with any form of Sharia Law.

We will not tolerate the call to prayer being blared out across British towns.

The colonisation of our cities by foreign enclaves practising medieval practices will end.

The islamification of Britain will be halted and reversed.

That is what Restore Britain will do.

If you agree, then join us. Join the party, attend your local meetings, volunteer.

Help us. Because we need it, and nobody else is going to do it. Not Farage, not the Tories, certainly not Labour.

This is up to us now.

And there is one answer.

Restore Britain.

[Bev Turner @beverleyturner]

This is not getting the attention it deserves.

The American State Dept just said that the @UN has facilitated deliberate mass migration to the West and this has been reckless and dangerous.

"For the citizens of Western nations, mass migration was never safe. It introduced new security threats, imposed financial strains, and undermined the cohesion of our societies."

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

Labour has moved to ban seven “far-Right” commentators from entering the UK, claiming their presence is “not conducive to the public good”.

The Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, has barred seven individuals — all outspoken on immigration — from entering the country ahead of Tommy Robinson’s Unite the Kingdom rally on Saturday. Some have previously attended events in the UK without issue.

During his “reset” speech on Monday, the Prime Minister announced the crackdown on conservative voices and criticised the Unite the Kingdom rally, claiming it was designed to “confront and intimidate this diverse city and this diverse country”.

He went on to say: “This is why this Labour Government will block far-Right agitators from travelling to Britain for that event. Because we will not allow people to come to the UK and spread hate on our streets.”

American conservatives should no more be banned from entering Britain than British socialists should be banned from entering the United States.

Keir Starmer’s Government should be prepared to defend its policies in the face of criticism from conservative voices — both domestic and foreign — rather than banning critics from entering the country.

The Labour Party did not seem too bothered about Labour staffers travelling to the US to campaign for Kamala Harris.

This is a poor decision.

Read more below 👇

[Katie Lam @Katie_Lam_MP]

This is completely mad.

Britain has no history of polygamy. It's been illegal to enter into a polygamous marriage in England since 1604.

When people come to this country, they should abide by our norms. Allowing them not to and then giving them taxpayer money for it is mental.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.

The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.

The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.

The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.

The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.

The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.

The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.

Now it is today.

Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.

He is confident.

He has always been confident.

The confidence has never been the problem.

The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.

Source: COVID19 VACCINE VICTIMS AND FAMILIES

[Chief Rabbi Sir Ephraim Mirvis @chiefrabbi]

Following the antisemitic stabbing of two Jewish people on the streets of Golders Green this morning, words of condemnation are no longer sufficient. This must be a moment that demands meaningful action from every institution, every community, every leader, and every decent person in our country. This is a hatred that we must face down together.

[Jamais Vu 🏉 @boot15_vu]

Wow!! Speech of the day, and there’s been some belters. 💥

[Alastair Hilton @London_W4]

I was woken this morning at 1:45am to the sound of breaking glass and then the sound of an outboard boat engine heading away. My youngest daughter lives in a narrowboat that is moored alongside mine here in London. As I got up to see what was going on, my phone went and it was her. She had woken to someone smashing her bedroom window with a hammer, two feet from her head as she slept. She was covered in glass. Her bed was covered in glass. I rushed around and her window was completely smashed. It will have taken them several attempts to smash the whole window out as they had. Everywhere was glass. On my daughter, on the bed. Everywhere. She called the police in tears and badly shaken and they told her they weren’t going to bother coming out as it had happened now and that was that. She got a crime reference number. A young woman in London has her bedroom window smashed in the middle of the night as she sleeps and the police aren’t interested. I need to tell you all; it is essential that you realise that we do not have a police service in this country. It is essential that you realise that and take measures as I am doing, to protect yourself and your family. You will not receive help from the police. I am not now going to rant about who I believe they are here to protect, but it certainly isn’t decent, working people like my daughter. I’m incredibly proud of my daughter who is of course, very, very shaken up. This was an horrendous incident but with a bloke smashing her bedroom window in as she slept, I don’t need to explain that it could have been far worse. I could not despise the police more. They’re not fit to wear a uniform. I shall ensure that anyone who harms my family will be far less healthy than they began the day. I’m really angry. I’ve spent the night emptying the millions of glass shards from my daughter’s duvet, sheets and pillowcases. Her head was within two feet of where someone with a hammer was smashing in her bedroom window. I’ve boarded up the window to make it secure. Take care out there people. You are alone when this happens. Ensure you can protect yourself. It’s all you have. There is no support and no backup. Please realise that and take action to defend yourself and your family.