@sporadica am I the only one who can see the *deliberate* irony and find it funny? he called his dick "the anaconda"! he doesn't expect people to actually believe he has a giant cock. he's making fun of jock bros, and being a self-effacing nerd. wtf is wrong with everyone?
@Cinemanarchism @Ellie8839677029 @GadSaad@joerogan Hi Zach, I believe it's actually neither of those two options. He just didn't answer your question at all, and instead made a separate point.
Did you genuinely not understand that, or are you being dishonest? In this case, it must be one of those two options.
@LHGH93186849@AndrewGold_ok Strongly disagree - she's intelligent all right. But she's so deeply into this black vs. white ideology that she is blind to the flaws in her arguments, and doing all sorts of intellectual contortions. It actually requires a decent degree of intelligence to be this wrongheaded.
@das_whirlwinds @wokal_distance@DouglasKMurray I dunno, I think two different people can have totally different levels of expertise on a historic topic, I think there's something in it
@credenzaclear2 To be hot you have to pretend you are just hot by accident, no effort goes into it, and you are not aware of it. All while putting work into being hot. It’s tough
@NateSilver538 Nate, honest question: do you think this kind of “allegation” (for what, against whom?) ever contributes positively to the discourse? If so, how?
@ericweinstein Can anyone explain why it is not “absolutely the wrong name for a real thing”? I see that @ericweinstein says he used to think that but now doesn’t. But WHY?
@AntiAIArtCringe Your post is in the form “One person said a thing, but I thought ‘people’ held a different view, hmmm.”
Clue: there are multiple people