@kixlepixel@sogilvie82@ZackPolanski 🤣🤣 don’t post soft porn in the comment section, yet have no issue with the same content broadcasted live?
And don’t assume child you’ll make an ass out of u and me.
THE DOSSIER #6: Angela Rayner MP – The Hypocrite-in-Chief
Born 1980. Council house, Stockport. Pregnant at sixteen. No qualifications. The origin story writes itself.
You lasted less than a year as a care worker. Twelve months of actual work, then straight into UNISON. Shop steward. Full-time union official. The Fabian Society claimed you soon after. You climbed from activist to Deputy Prime Minister without ever creating a job, meeting a payroll, or building a thing.
You called Conservatives "Tory scum." You called them scum from your £3 million grace-and-favour flat. You called them scum while you underpaid £40,000 in stamp duty on your £800,000 Hove bolthole. "Inadvertent," you called it. Richard Tice called you "the biggest hypocrite in the land." He was being kind.
Sir Laurie Magnus investigated. The Prime Minister's ethics adviser found you breached the ministerial code. He noted you "did not heed the caution" in your own legal advice. Forced to resign on September 5, 2025. Disgraced. Yet still you cling to that MP salary.
You preach working-class aspiration while your property portfolio expands. You lecture homeowners about propriety while you forget to pay tax on your second home. You are the council house girl who discovered the establishment pays better than the estates ever could.
You backed scrapping winter fuel payments for nine million pensioners. You defended the two-child benefit cap hitting working families. You wanted to claw back child benefit from households earning £50,000 while you dodged £40,000 in taxes yourself.
You are the professional working-class activist who monetised her own story. The authenticity merchant who sold the narrative and kept the change. The inadvertent tax-dodger who deliberately climbed.
Your seat is safe. The estates you left behind are not.
Congratulations. You are The Dossier. Your betrayal of Britain is complete.
@lukejcr@Nigel_Farage@CPAC Seems a little like pot calling the kettle black here @lukejcr your party and affiliates have dubbed anybody who says exactly this racist, so are you now a racist or just sticking to silent hypocrisy?
@kswindlehurst91@Dragodk1989@BasilTheGreat What? How does WW2 come into any of these problems we have today with immigration? So because people aren’t 100% British and colonizers 200 years ago. What…? 200k immigrants is our penance? Explain it to me. Your comment is confusing.
@lukejcr Didn’t you just make a post about farage and his political language? Now here you are calling people snowflakes? You’re a hypocrite. And judging by these comments… 🥶 others see it too. You’re a joke.
@lukejcr Just throwing shit about seeing what sticks. Your all the same Green Party arrests for slavery in 2025. Woman starves her dog to death labour maybe? Mandelson? Reeves? Raynor? MP tulip siddiq? Wanted by Interpol for corruption in Bangladesh? Pot. Kettle.?
@lukejcr Had nothing to do with her being a woman but a labour politician… do you know the difference between violent abuser and pissed off constituent? Sort yourself out it’s embarrassing.
🚨 NEW: The deputy of the UK Ambassador to the US, James Roscoe, has been sacked
He faced questions after top-secret National Security Council discussions, including Cabinet Ministers' verbatim remarks, were leaked to Tim Shipman of The Spectator
@Sicloudstorm@Heccles94@Nigel_Farage Well I didn't say it would be easy but nothing worth doing is.. I don't have all the answers but one thing I do know is that the current system isn't working and something drastic needs to be done. And I don't much appreciate your sarcastic tone 😒
@dimeji_csv@PolitlcsUK Who unravels first? Blue green or red? All racist parties if you don’t see that you’re an idiot keep up stirring that division pot… establishment simp.
This is Mohammad Baghdadi "Baggy" Khan reporting to duty as a newly elected Councillor in the Halliwell ward, Bolton. He looks composed in his Lamborghini Huracán Spyder, worth £100,000-£200,000, it does 19-23 mpg.
He is a member of @TheGreenParty.
Some of what you say at the beginning of your post is correct, but most of what you have written is cherry picked and flawed.
#1. Let’s start with embryology, and the “everyone begins the same” claim.
You correctly describe the early undifferentiated stage (genital ridge, Müllerian/Wolffian ducts, nipples forming before hormones). You overstate that this is evidence against a binary. Genetic sex is determined at conception when our genome forms. The SRY gene on the Y chromosome triggers male development; its absence leads to female development. Both pathways involve active genetic/hormonal orchestration. It is not a neutral “default” that routinely produces mismatches. Yes, variations exist, but they are exceptions, not the rule. Sex is binary in mammals because reproduction depends on two gamete types. Your framing implies typical trans identities are just natural “overlaps.” This is not supported by developmental biology.
#2. Intersex conditions and the 1.3 million UK figure.
This is your most misleading claim. You cite ~1.3 million intersex people in the UK (~2% of the population). This echoes Anne Fausto-Sterling’s erroneous 2000 1.7% estimate. This figure has been repeatedly debunked. It includes common, non-ambiguous conditions (CAH, Klinefelter, Turner). These are not intersex.
True prevalence of intersex conditions is ~0.018% (about 1 in 5,500 births). These conditions are so rare that the numbers are too small to publish reliably. Most people with DSDs identify with their natal sex and do not identify as transgender. Intersex conditions are medical disorders, not proof that sex is non-binary. Using DSDs in this way is a classic trans activist tactic: conflate rare medical anomalies with self-identified gender identity.
#3. Brain sex differences and the cited 2019 Nature paper.
Your post claims a 2019 Nature Reviews Neuroscience paper which claims transgender women’s brains resemble female patterns. It’s nonsense.
Here are the facts:
- Human brain sex differences are small, show massive overlap between sexes, and are not dimorphic enough to classify any individual brain as “male” or “female.”
- Most trans brain studies use small samples, often after cross-sex hormones (which alter brain structure), and don’t account for homosexuality.
- No neuroimaging can diagnose gender identity; claims otherwise overinterpret correlational data.
Yes, brain organization is influenced by prenatal hormones, genetics, and environment, but this does not prove a “female brain in a male body.” You suggest there is settled proof that trans identity is “rooted in biology, not imagination.” No evidence supports this.
#4. Historical/cultural “third genders” and the suicide/care claims.
Citing hijra, Two-Spirit, or fa’afafine is common but misleading. These were culturally specific social roles—often for same-sex attracted males, eunuchs, or ritual figures—not modern transgender medical transition with hormones and surgery. Equating them is wrong.
You cite the Trevor Project’s 2023 survey claiming a 73% reduction in suicide attempts with GAC. This was a self-selected online survey from an advocacy organization, not a controlled clinical study. It cannot establish causation. In contrast, the Cass Review and its systematic evidence reviews found the evidence base for puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones in youth “remarkably weak.” Multiple high-quality longitudinal studies (Sweden, Denmark, Finland) show no reliable long-term mental health benefits and elevated suicide risk persisting after transition.
Bottom line.
Your assessment is partisan and scientifically sloppy. It treats rare developmental variations and overlapping brain traits as justification for a medical model that recent rigorous reviews deem poorly evidenced, especially for minors. Biology shows human sexual development is unquestionably binary with rare disorders. It’s not a spectrum.