sean

[sean @callussean]

@moe4demm Grab her and stop her being a psycho?

[sean @callussean]

@RealPostFolder I have a relationship and that's mostly my motto.

[sean @callussean]

@eliaspeaks @madamadora1 @pinkcellgirl It's not the kind of question I'd expect ai to get wrong though. The data is readily available and the criteria is unambiguous.

But sure, looking at the sources is going to be a little better than just taking it blindly.

[sean @callussean]

@madamadora1 @eliaspeaks @pinkcellgirl I don't know your background but I expect I know considerably more about it that you.

I was studying gpt models before chat gpt was released and have actively worked testing them.

[sean @callussean]

@RealestMemes_ Smart boss.

[sean @callussean]

@nathaniel10169 @pinkcellgirl Yes, his "if x then y" is weak in a number of ways.

[sean @callussean]

@patriach2051 Go to a farm, see how much many calories per acre. Then go to somewhere natural see how many calories per acre.

The amount of resources without human intervention is insignificant compared to the amount with human intervention

[sean @callussean]

@5Solas It's more like, if we just set things up they way they were with non living matter, will it come living.

[sean @callussean]

@house_of_trad It's not worse, if the laws were good and they enforced them the world would likely be a better place.

[sean @callussean]

@famexbt Because the government is stealing from you.

100 years ago prices going down wasn't uncommon. The issue is, the value of currency is going down faster than the price of anything else.

[sean @callussean]

@madamadora1 @eliaspeaks @pinkcellgirl Yes, but that's not what happened?

It's useful for some things but not for everything.

I checked the sources it provided, they align with the summary.

[sean @callussean]

@Dlee1776 @eliaspeaks @pinkcellgirl If you're willing to check lots of sources carefully it's likely better than an ai overview (depending on you and the ai, Google's built in one isn't great).

An ai overview pulling in a wide array of results is why I'd expect it to be better than the average human.

[sean @callussean]

@SavagedRat @messedupfoods You can decide what your reward is.

[sean @callussean]

@arrobadiegogv @awfulswine @RAWigger You definitely would be concerned about them...

Getting laid is going to be a driving force no matter how stressful life gets.

[sean @callussean]

@ProudSocialist It's not clear how you would ever get something like a phone in a socialist system.

Assuming we were globally socialist.

[sean @callussean]

@Dlee1776 @eliaspeaks @pinkcellgirl Of course, the ai overview is going to be better than checking one source of information anyway (as a general rule).

[sean @callussean]

@eliaspeaks @pinkcellgirl I wasn't trying to be a source of ground truth... Just thought it was funny that the first result seemed to go against the assumptions of the post.

[sean @callussean]

@wtfahhh0 They could have at least found an attractive black girl?

[sean @callussean]

@HaterHaven69 @CNviolations But both partners could be polygamous.

There's not only one type 🤷

You have it wrong, polygamy is either sex.

Polygyny is actually one man multiple woman, and polyandry is the word you were looking for.