CORRECTED: @washingtonpost has corrected a major piece after CAMERA exposed that reporters spliced together unrelated Donald Trump quotes to manufacture an anti-Israel narrative.
This isn't just another weekend trip. It’s where you get the facts, own your history, and step into a leadership role.
Join CAMERA and ClubZ for an exclusive national gathering of Jewish teens ready to make an impact. You’ll leave with more than just knowledge—you’ll leave with a community that has your back.
Spots are strictly limited to 100. Claim yours before they're gone, or send this link to a friend who needs to be there.
https://t.co/cks18UQPsr
Our incredible researchers @JKouzi36 and @RealAaronGoren called out the New York Times for its complicity in Khanna’s play at populist politics by embedding with the congressman’s team and then failing to report critical facts.
Its decision not to provide photographic or video evidence of an event a U.S. congressman called “the most frightening” suggests it likely has no proof to support its publication of Khanna’s exaggerated claims.
The media’s failure here was amplified by Welker’s milquetoast interview with Khanna, which did little more than allow him to amplify his stunt to attempt to gain political capital in the United States.
https://t.co/kmJAUsYW6Z
Ro Khanna’s Dishonest Israel Stunt
By @havivrettiggur
Khanna and his group were not “detained,” as Khanna claimed. Detention means you can’t leave. As far as we can tell from available accounts and footage, nothing stopped them from turning around and leaving the way they came. The area was believed to require permission to enter, and Khanna’s group had not coordinated with the IDF, the Israeli police, or anyone else that anyone has been able to find who might have facilitated a U.S. congressman’s visit to the area.
Within about 20 minutes—this, according to the account by Khanna’s own team—an IDF patrol arrived and asked them to wait for the police. Police arrived roughly 30 minutes later—again, according to Khanna’s own team.
In other words, the congressman, after refusing to coordinate his visit, was delayed for about an hour before being allowed to enter the area in question. But if you listen to Khanna, it was “an unprecedented, illegal detention of Americans by a foreign country.”
Could there still be some damning evidence out there that will back up the substance of Khanna’s claims of violence, threats, and “detention”? Of course there could. But it’s been quite a few days now. No such footage has emerged. Given reports that the congressman’s entourage included a professional photographer and that the Israeli activist had a bodycam, it seems reasonable to assume that the lack of evidence strongly suggests it doesn’t exist.
https://t.co/zDFsE1oHdM
Why is ABC News allowing a known regime apologist to excuse attacks on civilian ships?
Following U.S. military strikes to protect international waters, @ABC’s Linsey Davis interviewed Trita Parsi, a man with deep ties to Iranian officials and a long history of pushing Tehran's agenda. When Parsi claimed Iran was justified in targeting commercial vessels for using the "wrong shipping lane," Davis failed to push back.
By failing to challenge Parsi's logic, ABC allowed extortion to be laundered as legitimate policy analysis. Read @RealAaronGoren's full expose on how the media lets the Iranian regime's talking points go completely unchecked.
ICYMI: CAMERA Fellow @ariannarosieb, a Christian Zionist, shows the power of facts and calm dialogue — helping an anti-Israel student reconsider Israel's right to defend itself against terrorist groups like Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis.
Real-time impact! ✝️🇮🇱
cc: @CUFI
Joseph Kahn, the @nytimes' executive editor, just made surprising comments about @nickkristof's highly controversial May 2026 column on Israel. Kahn admitted that the paper's newsroom "probably wouldn’t have" published the same piece, emphasizing that his piece was handled entirely by the opinion section, not the newsroom.
This raises two critical questions: How and why would the newsroom's reporting have been different?
Despite the bombshell nature of Kristof's allegations, the Times newsroom never followed up with its own investigation. Meanwhile, reports from Puck, Ynet, and the New York Post reveal deep internal frustration, with newsroom staffers allegedly embarrassed by the column.
This isn't Kristof's first controversy, which has ranged from retracted stories to a recent Semafor report that Kristof’s columns quoted or mentioned individuals who previously donated money to his failed gubernatorial campaign, a fact Kristof failed to disclose.
With internal rifts spilling into the public, readers deserve clarity. Does the New York Times stand behind Kristof’s grave allegations?
CAMERA’s @jessisajew had the honor of spending the afternoon with freed former hostages Keith and Aviva Siegel at the Alma Research Center in Northern Israel. Aviva has just published her testimony of Hamas captivity in Hebrew.
FLASHBACK:
Remember the time @nytimes called out Representative Randy Fine for his comments about Muslims. Yet, in the same piece described @NerdeenKiswani, an unapologetic supporter of terrorism, the October 7th massacre, champion of "globalizing the intifada," a virulent racist and leader of an anti-Jewish organization, as a "Palestinian organizer."
That’s not neutrality. That’s narrative framing.
If someone supports eliminating the world’s only Jewish state and chants “We don’t want two states, we want all of it,” that isn’t just activism. It’s extremism. And sanitizing it misleads readers. Call out ugly rhetoric wherever it exists.
But don’t apply moral clarity to one side while softening the other. Journalism should inform — not selectively edit reality.
https://t.co/vIWwOEBaTH
🚨 ALERT: CAMERA caught the Washington Post deceptively splicing and altering a Donald Trump quote in a way that falsely assigns blame to Israel.
In a July 2 report, @washingtonpost journalists claimed Trump complained about Israel disrupting negotiations with Iran, quoting him as saying: "They’ve wiped out everybody. I don’t want them to be killed."
Except Trump never said that.
Watch the actual video clip below. WaPo reporters spliced together two completely different answers from different parts of his presser.
Worse? They literally deleted the words "we've wiped out" from the transcript to hide that Trump was talking about the United States destroying terrorists, not Israel.
CAMERA has officially called on the Washington Post to issue a correction for this egregious, deceptive editing.
CORRECTED: @washingtonpost has corrected a major piece after CAMERA exposed that reporters spliced together unrelated Donald Trump quotes to manufacture an anti-Israel narrative.
🚨 When will the media understand that just because the @UN makes a claim, it doesn’t mean it’s true?
When the U.N.'s Commission of Inquiry released its latest report accusing Israel of deliberately targeting Palestinian children, major outlets including @nytimes, @CNN, @Reuters, and @NBCNews repeated its allegations with little to no scrutiny.
UPDATE: Thanks to the good work at @Camera4Truth, the Washington Post has finally run a correction at the end of the article in which it had cut and spliced Trump remarks to make it fit their narrative. Better than nothing. But obviously, not a formal apology, no acknowledgement of its terrible ethics, and no accountability for the journalists and editor who waved this through in the first place. A fireable offense in the old days when places like the Post had real standards.
@CNN, @BBC, and the @nytimes all reported "millions" mourning Khamenei in Iran. The catch? Their reporters were escorted by government minders, and the numbers came straight from the regime.
Meanwhile, local accounts showed empty streets and staged crowds. Media consumers deserve verified facts, not state-sponsored PR.
In light of the @nytimes' recent journalistic controversies, let's recall the time the "paper of record" determined that chanting "F*** the Jews!" two days after the Oct. 7 massacre was NOT antisemitic:
🚨Our groundbreaking new 129-page report is the first comprehensive mapping of the organizations behind Britain's post-Oct 7 anti-Israel, antisemitic protest movement.
6 groups coordinated the vast majority of the major protests we analyzed, with a protest network including foreign funding, major transparency gaps, and groups with links to extremist organizations. 🧵>>
What happens when the media reports on protests targeting Jewish lawmakers, but leaves out the antisemitism?
A recent @nytimes article covered California State Senator Scott Wiener being chased from a trans rights event over his stance on Gaza. But the piece almost completely erased a glaring fact: Senator Wiener is Jewish.
While the article framed the harassment purely as political pushback, it ignored a pattern of antisemitic tropes used against him—including accusations of having Israel/Zionist "handlers" and past harassment targeting his "bloodline."
From Dan Goldman being banned from a cafe to a Molotov cocktail thrown at Josh Shapiro’s home, Jewish lawmakers are increasingly targeted regardless of their actual voting records or criticisms of Israel.
By treating these incidents as simple policy disagreements, major media outlets risk masking the sharp rise of antisemitism under the guise of political protest.
All the orgs whose licenses expired expressed sympathy for and justified Palestinian violence, collaborated with orgs that employed antisemitic tropes, platformed terrorists, supported the BDS movement targeting Israel while delegitimizing the Jewish State, and promoted falsehoods and misrepresentations about the State of Israel. Any narratives that cast Israel’s aid group registration requirements as responsible for endangering innocent lives in the Gaza Strip are false and unjustified. https://t.co/JztVqH3u5O
Remember when terrorist exploitation of aid services got so bad that 37 international nonprofits operating in Gaza lost their licenses?
Israeli concerns that terrorist orgs were exploiting aid were not theoretical, but based on documented cases of terrorists doing just that by “diversion of aid, the use of local employees for terrorist purposes, and the transfer of funds from terror-linked sources," as stated by @cogatonline.
Doctors Without Borders employed terrorist Fadi Al-Wadiya - a senior operative of the terrorist org Islamic Jihad. Another individual they employed, Mahmoud Abunejeila, expressed support for the terrorist organization Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP).
🇺🇳⚠️🛑A senior UN official for the Middle East peace process and humanitarian coordination is condemning Hamas’s armed obstruction of aid delivery, saying its violent interference with humanitarian staff has halted food distribution and reflects a worsening pattern of abuse. The UN is only now acknowledging what’s long been obvious: Hamas has spent years stealing aid, intimidating NGO staff, and terrorizing civilians across Gaza. The scale of wasted billions and needless deaths caused by the group’s brutality during and after the war is staggering. Anyone who tried to expose this was smeared as “promoting genocide” or being a “Zionist collaborator,” even when the evidence was undeniable. Countless activists, advocates, journalists, academics, and politicians all played their part in enabling Hamas’s con intended to deepen Gazans’ suffering. Shame on every one of them. Thank you, @UNSCO_MEPP