Even tho all these movies weren’t well received as an actual kid who went out and bought comics and grew up with these characters, there’s not a bad movie in this lineup
Pre Disney MCU had diversity, none of these movies felt the same and they were specifically tailored to the characters. From the Shakespearean influence in Thor, to the handling of Tony’s alcoholism to Bruce’s actual struggles as a nomad etc.
Fase 1 del MCU
>introduce a sus 4 personajes principales en un lapso de 4 años
>Forma de manera genial a los vengadores
>Cada película formaba de apoco la historia que querían contar
El Dcu no tiene defensa para ser tan mediocre
JULY IS GOING TO BE A GOOD MONTH.
JULY IS GOING TO BE A GOOD MONTH.
JULY IS GOING TO BE A GOOD MONTH.
JULY IS GOING TO BE A GOOD MONTH.
JULY IS GOING TO BE A GOOD MONTH.
JULY IS GOING TO BE A GOOD MONTH.
JULY IS GOING TO BE A GOOD MONTH.
When did everyone agree on that? Plus Iron Man 3 was the 3rd installment of the MCUs flagship character…it was never not going to make money, this is just a bad comparison based on a lie lol
For context, everyone agrees IRON MAN 3 is such a bad movie. Yet it grosssed over $1.2 billion. Box office performance is not necessarily a yardstick for a good movie.
Alright now I get y’all didn’t like supergirl but let’s not start turning on Superman, that movie was really good and still is, the suit is just terrible lol
Appa flies them consistently and had just flown them there if I’m not mistaken, if Aang is capable he’s going to do it himself he doesn’t look at Appa as his pet/transportation that’s his friend who also gets tired of labor
@YourAvgBellman This would be a good argument if James Gunn didn’t go out of his way to make tv shows about niche characters that supposedly exist in the same universe showing little to no interest in the big 3 outside of Superman, the DCU isn’t a failure but their mapping is a bit questionable
Supergirl isn’t a terrible movie it just doesn’t have its own identity like Superman did. It felt like a generic superhero movie I’d already seen and that no fault to any of the actors that’s a writing/creative issue
Harry introduced Peter to Otto Octavius, one of Peter’s idols and influenced him to make time for Peter… Ned has had 3 movies and we’re still waiting on him to do anything outside of being Peter’s “guy in the chair”
You can say whatever you want about Ned, but he's a thousand times better friend and more loyal to Peter parker than Harry osborn ever was. And to me, it's not even up for debate.