Stg nothing ruins the perceived quality of a product more than some ai generated marketing materials … well, maybe something, but that’s definitely high on the list.
the smartphone unlocked a whole new way of interacting with the world 19 years ago … it’s due time for the next evolution in human-technology interaction
Introducing Cues: Voice & Gesture control for Matic
We raised $115M and spent 9 years to make the world’s first intuitive home robot
Say you spilled coffee: Point to the spill and say, "Hey Matic, clean this" and it will hear, see, locate in 3D, and go clean on its own.
Matic comes with a lot of features:
1. Say "Hey Matic" - it locates your voice, turns, and looks at you
2. Say "Hey Matic, follow me" and start walking. Matic will follow behind
3. Say "Hey Matic, go clean the living room". Since it knows your house map, it navigates and just does it
It's so easy, a 5 year old and an 80 year old can use it and it understands 75 different languages.
Matic has 8x the airflow, specialised cleaning algorithms for rugs, corners, toekicks, mopping, etc and cleans better than any other robot vacuum.
Also keeps improving with software updates.
13,000 families use and love Matic.
WIRED magazine gave it a 10/10 (the only hardware to receive this rating in a decade)
Buy yours at https://t.co/nLfY5pchxB and if you don't love it after 6 months, we'll give you a full refund.
To celebrate our launch, we're cleaning 300 homes with Matic in San Francisco and New York City.
Comment "Matic" below, we'll send you the link to sign up and come to your doorstep to clean your home with Matic.
If you’re trying to prevent ux leakage — i.e., where people start sth. and exit early — in user flows, is it really that bad to remove their ability to prematurely end?
If you want most users to actually complete sth., this is probably the only way to go.
brainstorming → refining → building → releasing
… → validating
always tempting to skip that last step when the initial brainstorming yielded many “great” ideas
but if you never check your work, might not be great on second thought
the current frontiers of scientific discovery are investigations into scale, both macro and micro (e.g., astronomy, biology)
would bet on advancements in the microworld first
the cumulative cost of ignoring the peak & end rule is significant
when you’re composing the music, just add a crescendo and end with fortissimo
often it’s pretty straightforward
@RoshanJMehta yagni
there’s a cost to designing code s.t. new features are easy to add, esp. when those new features never arrive due to changing reqs
could’ve gotten away with a simpler design in the first place (see pt. 2)
Need a case study on the economic impact of poor sleep quality on a single company … does it make sense (from a pure $ perspective) for companies to fully subsidize @eightsleep for employees?
Willingness to tackle hard problems is certainly higher after great night’s sleep …