Holy Shit. I mean Holy Fucking Shit:
He is the director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, a professor of pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine, and a co-inventor of the rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeq).
He has long publicly defended vaccines, argued against claims linking them to autism, and criticized figures like RFK Jr. on the topic.
Holy Hound-dog.
Five minutes into this Clancy case and the “official narrative” already feels like it’s held together with zip ties and Zoloft.
Recap:
We’re told Lindsay sent Patrick out
to run an errand, then took an infant, a three-year-old, and a five-year-old into the basement, separated them 🤔and strangled each one individually…. with exercise resistance bands….
Cora and Callan are found together. 🤔
Dawson is found separately in Patrick’s office still alive🤔. And we’re just supposed to accept that sequence without asking how it actually played out in physical space, in real time, with three small children and a single adult allegedly moving between rooms committing multiple staged strangulations? Not to mention the blood he claimed was everywhere when he returned.
Anyway….
Then you zoom out to Patrick.
Three children dead in January 2023.
Instant national framing: postpartum psychosis. He relocates to New York and by early 2024 is reportedly dating Dr. Rachel Danis — a reproductive endocrinologist and fertility specialist at Mount Sinai.
Danis’s CV includes pride of place: an investigator-initiated grant from AbbVie for a clinical trial involving elagolix. Pharmaceutical money, reproductive endocrinology, fertility pipelines — all neatly aligned in one résumé.
WTF
Same year, Patrick and his sisters launch the Heard Foundation, explicitly focused on perinatal mental health, with stated ambitions of building a dedicated treatment center for parents experiencing perinatal psychiatric illness.
WTF
By April 2026, Patrick and Danis are married. Meanwhile, the timeline of his divorce from Lindsay remains oddly inconsistent across public records and reporting.
Now step back and look at the pattern:
➟ A nationally televised case framed around postpartum psychosis
➟ A husband who relocates and partners with a reproductive medicine specialist
➟ A new spouse with documented pharmaceutical-funded fertility research
➟ A foundation built around perinatal psychiatric illness
➟ A push toward institutional treatment infrastructure
➟ State-level legislation (H.1924) addressing postpartum psychosis in legal contexts
If you were writing this as fiction, editors would tell you it’s a little too on-the-nose.
Reproductive medicine, pharma funding, psychiatric framing, and legal reform all orbiting the same tragedy.
Oh… and did I mention Patrick works for Microsoft and Clancy’s father works for lifetouch?
Seems Normal.
You can’t ignore the inconsistencies in the Lindsay Clancy case:
Credit to Alexus Savant (1/4) 🧵
I’m not saying that Patrick Clancy drugged his wife for months leading up to the murder of his children, drugged her heavily the night of, killed the kids, slit her throat and wrists, left for an alibi, came back and saw she was still alive so he threw her out the window…. But I’m also NOT NOT saying that… because his testimony DOES NOT ADD UP!!!!
Here’s some of my theory’s/evidence on this case:
1. I think he’s a sociopath. I think that’s why Lindsay googled if sociopaths can be treated. She wasn’t talking about herself. He shows zero emotions on the stand, literally looks bored and annoyed while describing the murder of his children, zero tears, not even when the 911 call played in court. Meanwhile Lindsay is in there sobbing hysterically every day.
2. In the 911 call he says “She killed the fucking kids!” Who calls their children, who are now dead, “the fucking kids” ??? Honestly think about how you’d react in that situation. Would you say that? Or would you be saying “my babies, oh my god my babies” or something similar?
3. This man was going on trips regularly, guys nights, brunches etc., while his wife is having severe enough mental health problems to be repeatedly committed. My husband wouldn’t even do that if I had THE FLU.
4. He’s only testifying for the defense because he’s suing the doctors that prescribed her meds for millions.
5. Lindsay’s wrists were cut horizontally. She was a nurse. Why would she cut the wrong way? Just to then launch herself out of a window? Also, women usually do not use gruesome methods to commit suicide. She had access to medications that she could’ve easily taken an entire bottle of to kill herself. But Patrick wouldn’t be able to drug her with enough of it to kill her without her noticing it in foods or drinks.
6. Prosecutors stated there were blood smears outside the window, under it, on the siding of the house. Meaning she didn’t jump out of the window. She slid out of the window. Kinda like somebody would do if they were limp from being drugged and blood loss, and were being pushed out of a window by another person? Also she landed on her back. If you jumped out, how tf would you land on your back? Wouldn’t you just dive head down to try and inflict maximum damage on the head if you’re trying to die? (1/4)🧵
If you don’t think he’s a woman, you’re transphobic. When he claimed to be a woman, he became a woman. He now belongs in women’s changing rooms, bathrooms, hospital wards, prison cells and rape support centres.
If you try and differentiate between him and a trans woman who looks more convincing as a woman, you are promoting patriarchal beauty norms. If you admit to seeing an aggressive and possibly unbalanced man in this video, you’re saying all trans people are mentally ill predators. If you refuse to let him into female-only spaces, you’re removing his right to exist. If you suggest he could comfortably use male facilities, you secretly want him assaulted. If you refuse to call him ‘she’, you are guilty of unpardonable cruelty. If you’re a woman who wouldn’t want to share a locker room with him, or a man who wouldn’t want your daughter, sister or mother to get undressed in close proximity to him, you belong to the far-right. If you point out that there is no objective difference between his claim to be a woman and that of any other biological male claiming a trans identity, you are too stupid to understand the circular arguments explaining why he’s not really trans whereas other men who say they’re women are really trans.
If you’re righteous, you must argue that this man’s self-declared identity overrides any consideration of the safety and rights of females. To be godly, you must agree he’s as ‘valid’ as every other trans woman, because people are who they say they are. No matter what your eyes, ears and common sense are telling you, if you don’t want to end up on the wrong side of history, you must pretend to believe that this angry, intimidating man is actually a vulnerable, oppressed woman.
We are living through a massive information crisis in which at least half the population is being systematically misinformed, making any sane national debate increasingly difficult. Without a shared factual foundation, there is nothing to discuss. People are not merely drawing different conclusions from the same evidence. They are living in entirely different realities.
That is what makes the Fauci story so tragic. He caused untold harm, yet millions of people know almost nothing about it. We can debate precisely how large a role Fauci played in the creation of Covid, but half the country does not even know that Covid came from a lab. We are therefore several steps removed from the basic conditions required to have an intelligent discussion.
Other facts are even more black and white. Fauci’s private diary contradicts what he told the public. His own words reveal a man of almost limitless narcissism. These are not matters of interpretation. They are documented facts. Yet we still cannot have a national conversation about them because the media either refuses to report them or actively lies about them. Anyone who is not on Twitter, which is most people, may never encounter the underlying evidence at all.
The result is that I increasingly find it almost impossible to discuss any of this with ordinary people, whether family members, acquaintances, or people at events or birthday parties. Unless someone has followed the evidence closely, there is no common starting point. Before you can debate what happened, you first have to dismantle at least ten years of falsehoods and omissions.
I do not know how this ends, but it is not sustainable. A country cannot function indefinitely when its people are no longer capable of discussing almost anything beyond sports on the basis of shared factual knowledge.
I’ll soon be sponsoring a bill to withhold federal money from municipalities and police departments that deploy Flock (and other style) cameras to surveil law abiding citizens.
Signed into law today: a homeschool freedom overhaul that makes NH a tier 1 state:
• a statutory right to homeschool
• no requirement to notify
• no mandatory assessment/portfolio reviews
• right to privacy of records
• opt-in for state-issued certificate of completion