Deco

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@Hoor9234 40 is the answer

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@m477lander @LucianaSierra06 @phantom @base Exactly, no active drain path is good, but leaving a near-max approval open still means the risk isn’t fully cleaned up

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@LucianaSierra06 @m477lander @phantom @base Exactly. Transparency matters more than a clean-looking tx history. Show the active permissions clearly so users know what’s still authorized

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@m477lander @That_Girl_Mal @phantom @base Fair point, but stale doesn’t automatically mean exploitable, the spender and allowance details still matter

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@That_Girl_Mal @m477lander @phantom @base The bigger issue for me is what happens after Remove. If the wallet says success, I’d want it to verify the permissions are actually gone rather than leaving users to check manually.

[Mallory @That_Girl_Mal]

@m477lander @phantom @base 7702 is just a costume Change.Remove only burns the temp code, then dumps you on an EOA with 0ETH so approve(0) dies. If sponsorship can pay the swap, it can zero both spenders before the flip. Show the spenders and “never expires” on the same card as the 2 USDC

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@m477lander @LucianaSierra06 @phantom @base I get the concern, but I wouldn’t say that alone makes it unclean. A live approval is a permission, not proof it’s being abused.

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@LucianaSierra06 @m477lander @phantom @base Exactly. I’d rather see a clear permissions state than assume 0 transactions means 0 risk.

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@absolutkylian Como

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@GunnerPuls Harry Kane

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@benvesen190333 28

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@m477lander @phantom @base I like 👍 the gasless concept, but users should see the spender, amount and duration before approving anything.

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@Freyaiiie 4 will be remaining, because that same 2 you broke are still the ones you fried and ate

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@Teaseryy 56

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@CostaStefane @m477lander @phantom @base Yeah, that will be the best thing

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@TreyCrocket @m477lander @phantom @base Same here. Gasless is great, but I shouldn’t need https://t.co/4EAe0tUEkB to discover what I approved afterward

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@Namit3394 @m477lander @phantom @base That distinction matters a lot. If approvals survive, calling it “Remove” creates the wrong expectation

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@Lau7O7 @m477lander @phantom @base Exactly. “Remove” should mean everything is cleared, or the remaining permissions should be clearly disclosed.

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@NativeSoundGod @m477lander @phantom @base Exactly. The swap worked, but hidden unlimited approvals are the real problem. They should always be visible and revocable.

[Deco @cannabisd2]

@m477lander @phantom @base This is a solid example of why successful transaction and
safe transaction aren’t necessarily the same thing