@Korzagg77@cera_fl@Jaaavis@tencor_7144 >If you have to pass a law to try and remove an entire court full of both republicans and democrats
Would this be a legal action?
@Korzagg77@cera_fl@Jaaavis@tencor_7144 Sure, but if the new judges rule that actually the old court decision was wrong, the law will also be followed, so I assume you won't be complaining.
@GarretMJ@mattyglesias I don't care about whether you're principled, I know that you're not, you're a republican. The point is you tried to guilt us about no principles in this comment, only to admit you had none:
@stanfordNYC@sam_d_1995@mattyglesias >Dems were hoping a large margin in the vote would dissuade the justices.
I mean, "cancelling an entire statewide election after the fact would probably be a huge abuse of your power" seems like a good argument.
@GarretMJ@mattyglesias "The democrats wanting to override a court means they have no principles"
"the republicans did the same already"
"yes but I don't care about that because I have no principles"
@stanfordNYC@sam_d_1995@mattyglesias If your argument is precedent required an entire 4-month election to be held and nullified it seems like a bad argument
@GarretMJ@mattyglesias "โI donโt get to sidestep the Virginia constitution to gerrymander so we must just replace all the judges for our favorโ is exactly how democrats see democracy."
How do republicans see democracy, Garrett? Given Utah.