@grahamformaine Ruben Gallego was originally peddling this claim amid his own set of controversies. Now Platner is doing the same.
https://t.co/EsD6tk4r8i
@grahamformaine This deserves a community note. Concern over the potential for surveillance pricing is reasonable.
Planter's claim that airlines are *currently* using deaths in the family to determine prices is not supported by the evidence.
@quinn10264@ZaidJilani "Epstein class enabler" is the left-wing equivalent of terms like "groomer" or "globalist."
There's some real phenomenon underneath, but the term is so imprecise, elastic, and conspiratorial that it mostly serves as general-purpose smear that further deranges our discourse.
@ZaidJilani I don’t wish ill on someone who lies all the time because he has PTSD, but I don’t want that person to be a U.S. senator, either.
I also don’t want Collins to be a senator, which is why I think it might be good for the guy who has a problem with lying to step down.
@steady_drumbeat@girlbosswoman The version that actually hurts Platner is prominent Dems going hard negative publicly, and I'd agree that's a mistake. But that's a much narrower claim than what you're making.
So, the conditional probabilities here seem much more nuanced.
@steady_drumbeat@girlbosswoman The term "support" is overloaded, but I think you're conflating pretty different things. Me, a rando on Twitter, thinking Platner should step aside has no effect on his odds.
I think the same goes for prominent Dems *quietly* encouraging him to drop out, behind closed doors.
@steady_drumbeat@girlbosswoman I don’t think Mills is a good option, in the same way I thought Harris was a bad option to replace Biden. I still supported rolling the dice there, but more wary here.
Mills is unpopular but polled slightly better than Platner against Collins in the last poll before the primary.
@steady_drumbeat@girlbosswoman The party has until July 13th to name a replacement candidate, if it wants. So there is a plausible technical means to replace him.
Whether that is wise or practical (what I take you to mean by “realistic”) is the whole question.
@steady_drumbeat@girlbosswoman I agree. It’s a gamble. But the polling currently suggests a generic Democrat does better than Platner (by a meaningful margin).
So, I think everyone should be less confident in their position here.
Platner is a bad candidate. Getting rid of Platner is risky.
@wurst007_hans@AliceFromQueens@alicianieves__ That’s true, but a spike in crime would obviously be worse than the DSA grumbling, so this doesn’t seem like a difficult or particularly brave decision.
I’m not suggesting he deserves *zero* credit, but it’s a pretty easy political calculation, not some brave move.
@wurst007_hans@AliceFromQueens@alicianieves__ I don't think refraining from doing something stupid that could reverse the broader national decline in crime playing out in his city should be considered a "great move," but yes, I'm glad he didn't do that.
@p0uchcotato@TheRealJChubby@MisterSineWave Can you provide a few specific examples of people you have in mind who are dependent on X to earn a living and would not otherwise be able to do so?
@p0uchcotato@TheRealJChubby@MisterSineWave The meme was posted as a response to a criticism of the specific person who actually started this thread, who lives in the U.S.
But I think I’ve already addressed your broader point, and I don’t think many people outside the U.S. are earning a living on X, either.