I am honestly tired and don't have time for this.
I work with quantum algorithms as part of my work, and have run experiments on many hardware providers including ionq.
You can read our papers online. I build/optimize quantum compilation pipelines (including optimizing error correcting code implementations), so I understand these topics quite well.
Simulations are at the end simulations. Also 99.99 fidelity by ionq was only an experiment with electronic control, which is not available on normal machines. So, that comparison is flawed from the start. In practice, we get less than 99.5 ish for 2-qubit fidelity even with ionq devices.
On the other hand, we cant even run any nisq algorithms on neutral atoms as of now. They need error correction.
Writing a paper is not the same as implementing it in hardware. Which is not the same as making them available on customer devices.
I stop here. Take this info if this is useful.
Why is every $IONQ bull salivating over the unreleased, undelivered 256 physical qubit system, but completely dismissive of $INFQ 30 logical qubit release?
I’m excited at quantum in general but ngl all this talk makes me hate ionq
The biggest risk in $IONQ?
Execution & synergies. 7 acq. in 3 yr, yet people assume every deal integrates and creates value. If even 1 of these VC acq. miss expectations, downside could be material
Lets not forget quantum is a high burn, high risk industry, and IONQ just bet 7x
@QInvestorNotes Probably if they will be able to adjust revenue guidance. The % yoy growth was very weak initially.
I just think that COGS is not viable metric in quantum right now. Seems like it will be an expensive product to build in the interim
As the global quantum community gathers in Chicago today for the Global Quantum Forum, the city continues to strengthen its role as one of the world's leading centers for quantum innovation.
Today, we're announcing two major milestones in that momentum: Infleqtion will deploy its fault-tolerant, neutral-atom quantum computer at the Illinois Quantum & Microelectronics Park (IQMP) in 2027, and we've opened our new Chicago Quantum Innovation Center to advance quantum applications for the American energy grid.
Building on successful deployments in the U.K. and Japan, we're bringing a proven, operational quantum platform to the U.S. while providing researchers and industry partners access to our fault-tolerant neutral-atom technology through the National Quantum Algorithm Center.
As quantum moves from research to deployment, Chicago is helping shape what's next, and we're excited to be part of building that future.
Read more: https://t.co/hbtjjPsytD
I asked AI what other companies have helped write and shape federal policies like $INFQ has… (e.g., two Executive Orders & Quantum Enhanced Critical Minerals Mapping Act).
Its response:
@BerlinARK Helpful tip- don’t use trailing figures to support your conclusion, especially in quantum. It shows you don’t know what you’re talking about