@longislandviper i remember hearing some [old] twitter users complaining about how they had to bribe twitter employees to get verified
i imagine there's some degree of this at a lot of tech companies
@desert_starr_57 the last two girls' lips were moving, but neither sync up with the words. I think they're both muted and it's actually Molly who's speaking
@Unnamed_Mortal@icevalky the devs didn't shit on gaming, Anita did. And if this is how it's going to be, then Asmongold should make a list of those who are persona non grata so devs know who not to associate with
@LuckyKnotai@Awk20000 ok, so make it explicit: Game developers are not allowed to employ anyone deemed bad, irrespective of what service is being provided or the context in which it is being provided
now that we've established this, my follow up question: Is she allowed to have a job in fast food?
@LuckyKnotai@Awk20000 "Goal is to make developers afraid of collaborating w ppl"
In the absence of evidence that Anita consulted in an objectionable way on this project, how else should the above statement be interpreted? Other than "do not employ someone we say is bad"?
@Deplorabologist@Awk20000 ok, what elements were changed?
^^ don't you see the faulty footing from which you're making your argument? This is why Asmongold is wrong: It requires making an assumption.
And, in this case, the assumption is probably correct. But it won't always be