I’m less interested in today's AI headlines.
I’m watching who is still paying for compute.
Meta is pushing custom silicon.
CoreWeave is raising another $3B to expand.
AI cloud providers are still raising prices on scarce compute.
That doesn’t look like demand disappearing.
It looks like the AI buildout is getting more expensive, more customised, and more capital-intensive.
I’m still holding $NVDA and $MU .
The question for me isn’t “Is AI over?”
It’s who keeps getting paid as the spending mix changes.
#market #stock
@XiaoQuanig Already in. Not adding at $219.Add only $213.90–$212.50.
Wrong on a close through $212.50. If it never dips, I keep the position. I don’t chase this print.
Premarket note, scored after the close.
Didn’t buy the gap. Didn’t have to.
$NVDA opened at $218.38, low $217.15, never saw $213.90. Closed at $219.34.
$MU closed at $977.50. No dip to $926.
$TSLA closed at $366.20.
SOX +3.1%. Nasdaq +1.7%. Dow +0.6%.
Same split. Chips still had the bid.
Add levels didn’t print. That’s fine. I’m not chasing $219 either.
Still in $NVDA $MU $TSLA. Wrong remains a close back through $212.50.
Next session I care if $NVDA holds today’s $218.38 open.
Not buying the gap.
Already in $NVDA $MU $TSLA .
Why I’m still holding: the hike hit the Dow. It did not hit the chip bid.
Premarket, that’s still true: $NVDA ~$217, $MU ~$947.
Where I buy more, not where I chase:
$NVDA only on a dip toward $213.90–$212.50.
$MU only toward $926–$918.
Wrong if $NVDA loses $212.50 on a closing basis.
Wrong if $MU loses Wednesday’s $917.64.
This is the long book. Not a 9:30 market order.
#stock #market #trading
Not buying the gap.
Already in $NVDA $MU $TSLA .
Why I’m still holding: the hike hit the Dow. It did not hit the chip bid.
Premarket, that’s still true: $NVDA ~$217, $MU ~$947.
Where I buy more, not where I chase:
$NVDA only on a dip toward $213.90–$212.50.
$MU only toward $926–$918.
Wrong if $NVDA loses $212.50 on a closing basis.
Wrong if $MU loses Wednesday’s $917.64.
This is the long book. Not a 9:30 market order.
#stock #market #trading
@TheStreet Everyone wants to trade the volatility.
I’m more interested in whether the underlying earnings thesis is changing.
So far, I don’t see it.
That’s why “own it, don’t trade it” makes more sense to me for $NVDA .
@babyfolio Narratives are usually late.
The chart moves first, then everyone suddenly finds a reason.
That's why I care more about whether the thesis changed than whether the stock moved.
The setup still looks bullish to me.
The Fed just raised rates.
The 10Y pushed above 5%.
And semiconductors still held up.
That’s important.
If higher yields were enough to break the AI trade, I’d expect $NVDA , $MU and $AVGO to be getting hit much harder.
Instead, the market is still rewarding earnings growth.
My read:
AI isn't being priced on rates alone anymore.
It's being priced on whether earnings can keep outrunning the macro pressure.
That's the part I'm bullish on.
I could be wrong.
But I’d need to see AI earnings expectations actually roll over before I turn bearish.
@MarcosMillaYT@stock_analysisx $MU is an interesting one here.
The big question for me isn't just earnings growth anymore.
It's whether the market starts believing this memory cycle is structurally different from the last one.
That's where the valuation story gets interesting.