Carl Olme

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@TobbieXY I saw someone having screenshot of several similar posts. Earlier today I saw several posts (in spanish) with different women posing with their allegedly new passports saying how happy they are to be Spanish. This seems to be a determined campaign in different countries.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@MartinMonmouth @PippaCrerar X is not "the public", it is a small not very representative representation of some of the oublic and a lot of anonymous bots.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@ZoeJardiniere This isn't at all a good response. I see the potential issues with the glasses but unless they use them to record people without consent this is just bullying and the person with the glasses need better friends.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@justice4_shukri @KirstieMAllsopp Sorry, where has Helen Mirren shown "open support for the physical genoicde"? I don't think you can support that statement.

[BBC News (UK) @BBCNews]

Women offered jabs in HIV prevention trial https://t.co/QsCCafz8R5

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@JSpaz41 @CharlesNOVacc @CaptainVirgilx @NadiaWhittomeMP I am not trans, but even if I were there is nothing wrong with being trans.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@CaptainVirgilx @NadiaWhittomeMP Are you saying this ruling changes nothing ?

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@CaptainVirgilx @NadiaWhittomeMP Charming. I have been nothing but polite and you hurl abuse. Clearly you don't have much relevant to say.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@CaptainVirgilx @NadiaWhittomeMP To be seen legally as women. Which they were before.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@CaptainVirgilx @NadiaWhittomeMP An interpretation of the law is how the law is applied in court. This interpretation has changed. The law will be applied differently.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@CaptainVirgilx @NadiaWhittomeMP The rights as the law was interpreted before. If the law now is interpreted as trans women are not legally women, this is is change to their legal situation before the ruling.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@CaptainVirgilx @NadiaWhittomeMP It allowed trans women to be considered as the gender woman. The law did not specify legal sex before it was legal gender. Trans women have lost so.ething with this new interpretation. Campaigners were right when they said the aim was to remove rights.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@CaptainVirgilx @NadiaWhittomeMP Yes it did permit that. That was never debated or questioned. But now trans women are not considered women in law and before they were.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@CaptainVirgilx @NadiaWhittomeMP Trans women were treated as women under the previous interpretation of the law. So yes they have lost legal rights.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@CaptainVirgilx @NadiaWhittomeMP They lost the legal right to be seen as women no? That is a significant change. So much for not wanting to take away rights.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@TonyHinton2016 @suevictorian @NadiaWhittomeMP If the only reason you have concerns for women is because you have a wife and daughters you don't really have true concerns. What it sounds you are saying is if you were not in that situation you would have any concerns.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@amy_likes_owls @RachelBitecofer @Noahpinion The study ypu link to are not looking at trans athletes.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@MemerEpic97811 @RachelBitecofer @Noahpinion Yeah i did read. See my other comment.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@MemerEpic97811 @RachelBitecofer @Noahpinion The conclusions also say precautionary bans are cautioned against. It is basically preliminary research. I did say it was emerging research. More research should be performed.

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@RachelBitecofer @Noahpinion Saw there were some abusive comments.
Links:
https://t.co/EiEvNGv80Q

Original research article
https://t.co/NkeJbatu2K

[Carl Olme @carlolme]

@RachelBitecofer @Noahpinion There are emerging research by the IOC that shows trans women athletes may actually not have as much advantage if at all.