Carlos Alberto Gomes

[Kenny Carmody @KennyCarmody]

These four charts are from CDC Wonder. Retrieved by John Beaudoin Sr. They are not speculation. They are the official death record of the United States.

Look at what they show.

Kidney failure in Americans aged 15 to 54, a population that does not die of kidney failure at scale, spiked in the winter of 2021 to 2022 to levels never recorded in the prior decade of data.

Not in 2020. Not during the first wave.

Not during the second. The third wave. After the rollout.

Pneumonia deaths in the same healthy age group followed the same pattern. Flat across ten years of baseline. Then 2020. Then higher in 2021. Then the winter of 2021 to 2022 produced a peak that dwarfs everything before it.

The COVID-coded deaths tell the same story from a different angle. The third wave was the deadliest. This is not how respiratory viruses behave in populations that have acquired immunity through prior infection and vaccination. Immunity, natural or induced, reduces severity over successive waves. It does not produce a third wave larger than the first two combined in a young, previously healthy population.

And the all-cause mortality chart says what all the others are pointing toward. Something was killing Americans aged 15 to 54 in the winter of 2021 to 2022 at a rate the previous ten years of data cannot explain and the official narrative has never honestly addressed.

There are two candidates. The hospital protocols that determined how sick people were managed once they entered the system. And the product that had been administered to the majority of the adult population by the time that winter arrived, whose mechanism of action on the immune system, on clotting function, on cardiovascular and renal physiology, was still being characterised in the same post-market environment that was producing the deaths now visible in these charts.

Kidney failure does not appear in a healthy population without a cause.
The cause is in the record.

John Beaudoin went and found it with a FOIA request and a spreadsheet while every institution with a budget, a mandate, and a legal obligation to ask the question did not ask it.

The charts are the question.

The silence is still the answer.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Credit to @JohnBeaudoinSr

@SenRonJohnson @AaronSiriSG @P_McCulloughMD @stkirsch

[Carlos Alberto Gomes @carlosalbgomes]

@PVingaard @averros271828 @BrianDonovtu4b @stopvaccinating Look and read. There are plenty of examples around there in the last six years...

[Carlos Alberto Gomes @carlosalbgomes]

@PVingaard @averros271828 @BrianDonovtu4b @stopvaccinating PCR as a virus/disease testing can be easily misused and wrongfully interpreted as it's documented from the COVID era. So, when we are talking about asymptomatic, the problem is exactly the same.
https://t.co/KCZdmVHCcb

[Carlos Alberto Gomes @carlosalbgomes]

@AaronSiriSG I bet she will not dare to debate.

[John Beaudoin, Sr., The Real CdC, The Last Boomer @JohnBeaudoinSr]

The Covid vaccine killed Victor Simoes 34 via Aortic Dissection.

Victor's parents proved it in lab work. The vaccine causes aortic dissections.

[Marina Helena @marinahelenabr]

23:59:
ICL defende aumento de impostos sobre os "super-ricos".

00:00:
Super-ricos donos do ICL dão um jeito de não pagar o imposto que defendiam.

Confirmando, mais uma vez, que a única "redistribuição" que esquerdista defende é com o dinheiro dos outros.

[Carlos Alberto Gomes @carlosalbgomes]

São respostas como esta que ainda me fazem ter um resto de esperança na Humanidade. O MPV está de parabéns pela resposta dada à Agência Lupa, embasada em ciência e não em propaganda patrocinada por nefastos interesses, nomeadamente económicos.
https://t.co/2NNFeeSBRZ

[Birgit Kelle @Birgit_Kelle]

Frankreich hat gestern entgegen den Mehrheiten in der Bevölkerung in dem Thema ein Euthanasie-Gesetz des Grauens verabschiedet, das jede ethische Hürde und Missbrauchs-Gefahren schlicht ignoriert. Der Wunsch zu sterben muss nicht einmal schriftlich vorliegen, es muss kein Zeuge es bestätigen, auch nicht ganz zurechnungsfähige Personen sollen euthanasiert werden können, wenn sie den Wunsch zu sterben durch "Ausdrucksmittel, die den Fähigkeiten der Person entsprechen" ausdrücken. Die Familie des Patienten muss nicht informiert werden und bekommt auch kein Einspruchsrecht, später auch kein Klagerecht gegen den Arzt. Ein einziger Arzt kann alleine innerhalb von knapp 3 Tagen einen Patienten schlicht töten. Akte zu, Patient tot.

@HLauzun für @StatementIntl über ein Gesetz dass der französische Autor Houellebecq zutiefst beunruhigt mit den Worten kommentiert: „Wir betreten eine Welt, in der es leichter sein wird zu sterben; ich hätte eine Welt bevorzugt, in der man leben kann“. https://t.co/WCqQBhOvuP

[Glenn Diesen @Glenn_Diesen]

The NATO-backed coup in Ukraine was on February 22, 2014. In the article below, the New York Times confirms that two days later, on February 24, the new Ukrainian intelligence chief of the government that the US had handpicked, called the CIA and MI6 to establish a partnership against Russia. Only a few days earlier, Russia had been the main security partner of Ukraine - after the coup, it would become NATO's frontline state against Russia.

The CIA operation against Russia developed from 2014-2022:
- "12 newly-built, forward operating bases constructed along the Russian border. From each base, General Kondratiuk said, the Ukrainian officers ran networks of agents who gathered intelligence inside Russia. C.I.A. officers installed equipment at the bases to help gather intelligence and also identified some of the most skilled Ukrainian graduates of the Operation Goldfish program, working with them to approach potential Russian sources."

- "The listening post in the Ukrainian forest is part of a C.I.A.-supported network of spy bases constructed in the past eight years that includes 12 secret locations along the Russian border... Around 2016, the C.I.A. began training an elite Ukrainian commando force — known as Unit 2245 — which captured Russian drones and communications gear so that C.I.A. technicians could reverse-engineer them and crack Moscow’s encryption systems.

The CIA/MI6 presence in Ukraine became a key motivation for the Russian invasion:
- "Toward the end of 2021, according to a senior European official, Mr. Putin was weighing whether to launch his full-scale invasion when he met with the head of one of Russia’s main spy services, who told him that the C.I.A., together with Britain’s MI6, were controlling Ukraine and turning it into a beachhead for operations against Moscow."

*** The war in Ukraine was clearly provoked (and even started) by NATO. The amount of evidence makes this undeniable. However, the political-media establishment defends the "unprovoked invasion" narrative by dismissing and criminalising all explanations of NATO's involvement as efforts to "legitimise" the Russian invasion. Why is NATO's contribution to starting this war important? If we recognise NATO's contribution and the legitimate Russian security concerns, then it opens up an opportunity for compromise and peace. By clinging to the "unprovoked invasion" narrative, weapons are the path to peace, and NATO gets to continue its war against Russia to the last Ukrainian.
https://t.co/gmmWD698bx

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

Healthy man dies of toxic shock after taking Moderna's mRNA bird flu vaccine while taking part in their clinical trials.
Here we go again.

https://t.co/DsfEbQ0xBA

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

US infant school teacher says her pupils are getting sicker and sicker and it’s due to their multiple ‘vaccinations’.
Why would she risk her career making ‘false claims’ , she has seen the effect on small children in her care with her own eyes.
When will more people speak out ?

[Carlos Alberto Gomes @carlosalbgomes]

@stkirsch Why does she believes that mRNA is safe and effective? Does is she in the payroll of those who economically benefits from this technologie? I bet she is!

[Carlos Alberto Gomes @carlosalbgomes]

@clarionrox @MafinhaBarba O principal custo para o Brasil será político, diplomático e reputacional, ao manter como juiz alguém que venha a ser condenado por atos "ultra vires", tal como os peticionantes requerem. Esse custo pode ser bem mais penoso do que um qualquer outro custo monetário. [2 de 2]

[Carlos Alberto Gomes @carlosalbgomes]

@clarionrox @MafinhaBarba Não será o Brasil a pagar pois, como a peça processual em epígrafe refere, o processo é contra a pessoa física de Moraes, o qual agiu fora das suas competências legais ("ultra vires"). Assim, será o Moraes que terá de pagar se condenado. [1 de 2]

[Paul Moore - Security Consultant  @Paul_Reviews]

Bypassing the latest #EU #ageVerification app (2026.07-1) with a Chrome extension... again.

Despite 3 months of security hardening and genuine improvements across the board, the fundamental issue cannot be solved.

Anonymous age verification doesn't work.

[TomBayou @Tom_Bayou]

"Kein Witz: im April/Mai waren 94% der Covid-Toten in Großbritannien geimpft, 85% sogar geboostert.

Ungeimpfte machen zwar 25% der Bevölkerung (rot), aber nur 6% der Toten aus.

Deutschland liefert natürlich erst gar keine solchen Daten."

13.07.2022 #RichtigErinnern

[Filipe Rafaeli @filipe_rafaeli]

DADOS DA VACINA MODERNA QUE OS DIVULGADORES CIENTÍFICOS NÃO TE CONTAM

É a marca que o Brasil comprou para distribuir para a população. Foram milhões de doses compradas.

Segue o fio que vou esmiuçar o ESTUDO OFICIAL dela. E vai ter reviravolta, viu? Vem comigo: 🧶

1/18

[Carlos Alberto Gomes @carlosalbgomes]

@PVingaard @averros271828 @BrianDonovtu4b @stopvaccinating In absolute numbers of course it can not be. But when we talk about false positives we always talk about rates, not absolute numbers. So, at best your frase is misleading and should be corrected (it should not pass a peer review process without the proper correction).

[Carlos Alberto Gomes @carlosalbgomes]

@PVingaard @averros271828 @BrianDonovtu4b @stopvaccinating Really? 'The false positive rate is the rate of tests giving a positive result without containing the virus looked for. So, when only 0.2% of tests are positive, the false positives obviously cannot be higher than this [i.e., 0.2%].' Yes, it can because it's relative to 0.2%!

[Carlos Alberto Gomes @carlosalbgomes]

@PVingaard @averros271828 @BrianDonovtu4b @stopvaccinating It's what you wrote. The cited paper was only an example that a false positive rate can be so high as 100%.