Steven Carr. @carr_steven - Twitter Profile

🚨 Serco - the government contractor that runs large parts of Britian's immigration and justice operation - has taken the extraordinary position of saying it would oppose Reform's plan to deport illegal migrants from Britain. Having read the Telegraph's report making this claim, I have written to Serco's CEO asking him to urgently clarify their position. Serco is the firm the Home Office uses to deposit unvetted men from Syria, Afghanistan, Iran and Iraq into British housing estates without the knowledge nor consent of local residents. Serco is the firm that launches huge bids for rental homes, outbidding local residents by such a vast amount that lifelong residents - including veterans - have been served eviction notices by landlords. All to house illegal migrants. Serco has expressed no moral concern about any of this. Yet they apparently take exception to our plan to actually uphold immigration law and remove those who break it. Moreover, if the Telegraph's reporting is correct, a company so enmeshed in the British state it even runs recruitment for British Armed Forces, says it will take a hostile position to a duly elected Reform government. If the Telegraph’s reporting is correct, the only reasonable interpretation of Serco’s position is that it now believes itself to be an alternative power base to the duly elected government of the United Kingdom, and is willing to act contrary to the interests of the British electorate. If this were true, a Reform government would be left with no choice but to view Serco as a threat to national security. I have given Serco until 6pm to clarify their position. Should they fail to do so, we will take the following steps to decouple the British Government from Serco: 1) On forming a Government, we will initiate an accelerated review of all Government contracting with Serco with the aim of removing Serco as a public contractor within our first Parliamentary term. 2) Where Serco has breached contracts or break clauses are available, we will terminate those contracts and continue to exercise break clauses as they come due. My full letter below 👇

ZiaYusufUK's tweet photo. 🚨 Serco - the government contractor that runs large parts of Britian's immigration and justice operation - has taken the extraordinary position of saying it would oppose Reform's plan to deport illegal migrants from Britain.

Having read the Telegraph's report making this claim, I have written to Serco's CEO asking him to urgently clarify their position.

Serco is the firm the Home Office uses to deposit unvetted men from Syria, Afghanistan, Iran and Iraq into British housing estates without the knowledge nor consent of local residents.

Serco is the firm that launches huge bids for rental homes, outbidding local residents by such a vast amount that lifelong residents - including veterans - have been served eviction notices by landlords. All to house illegal migrants.

Serco has expressed no moral concern about any of this.

Yet they apparently take exception to our plan to actually uphold immigration law and remove those who break it.

Moreover, if the Telegraph's reporting is correct, a company so enmeshed in the British state it even runs recruitment for British Armed Forces, says it will take a hostile position to a duly elected Reform government.

If the Telegraph’s reporting is correct, the only reasonable interpretation of Serco’s position is that it now believes itself to be an alternative power base to the duly elected government of the United Kingdom, and is willing to act contrary to the interests of the British electorate.

If this were true, a Reform government would be left with no choice but to view Serco as a threat to national security.

I have given Serco until 6pm to clarify their position.

Should they fail to do so, we will take the following steps to decouple the British Government from Serco:

1) On forming a Government, we will initiate an accelerated review of all Government contracting with Serco with the aim of removing Serco as a public contractor within our first Parliamentary term.

2) Where Serco has breached contracts or break clauses are available, we will terminate those contracts and continue to exercise break clauses as they come due.

My full letter below 👇

837

10K

3K

586

624K

Steven Carr. @carr_steven

about 20 hours ago

@DanJarvisMBE A spokesperson for the MoD admitted the footage had been recorded after initial forces had already “cleared” the Smyrtos.

0

1

0

28

Steven Carr. @carr_steven

about 20 hours ago

Throw enough mud some might stick

Gawain Towler @GHWTowler

about 22 hours ago

Looking at this again. It is an outrageous allegation for a member of Parliament to make. Surely it is outside the political norm. If he has evidence he should report to the police. If not, then how can the Labour Party allow it unchallenged?

GHWTowler's tweet photo. Looking at this again. It is an outrageous allegation for a member of Parliament to make. Surely it is outside the political norm.
If he has evidence he should report to the police. If not, then how can the Labour Party allow it unchallenged? https://t.co/gUU5C10p9x

209

2K

557

22

46K

0

8

Steven Carr. @carr_steven

about 20 hours ago

https://t.co/9lEfTTmSxs

0

3

Steven Carr. @carr_steven

1 day ago

@CMcKinnellMP

0

6

Steven Carr. @carr_steven

1 day ago

@AshfordLabour

0

3

0

23

carr_steven retweeted

Amanda Stoker - I Despise Labour @MandaStoker

1 day ago

@AshfordLabour

0

4

1

0

51

Steven Carr. @carr_steven

1 day ago

@Keir_Starmer Banning Social Media to protect children! I have other thoughts on this matter to do with undocumented males roaming the streets.

0

3

carr_steven retweeted

BanksyCat

@Banksycat

1 day ago

The MoD felt the need to deny the tanker raid was staged. Ask yourself why. Because in the same breath they accidentally confirmed everything people were saying Their own spokesman admitted footage was taken at multiple points and compiled together. Different takes. Edited into one seamless video. A voice can be heard saying ROLLING. And telling a soldier to HOLD THAT during a live search of the vessel. Those are not military commands. Those are film production commands. And the MoD just told us that themselves. The policy to seize shadow fleet ships was announced in MARCH. Three months. Not one tanker touched. The Smyrtos sailed from the Russian oil terminal Ust-Luga on June 4. They tracked it for ten days as it crossed the North Sea and entered the Channel. They did not stumble upon this ship on the night of June 14. They chose the night before the G7 to act. That is not a military decision. That is a scheduling decision. World leaders arriving the next morning specifically to discuss standing up to Russia. Starmer needed something to walk into that room with. 3am operation. Tweet before breakfast. Video uploaded before the world woke up. The man Trump publicly called not Winston Churchill needed to walk into the G7 looking like one. So he produced a film the night before the G7 to prove he is still relevant. As DPP he volunteered to go after British soldiers. Did not have to. Was not asked to. Chose it. For free. Here’s is what makes this truly obscene. The man now wrapping himself in the Armed Forces spent years pursuing British soldiers through the courts. Nobody asked him. Nobody paid him. He chose to prosecute them. Worked for free to do it. That is not a lawyer doing his job. That is a man with an agenda. Armed Forces shrinking by 300 a month. Lowest since the Napoleonic Wars. Eleven days before this three Royal Marines were killed when a Merlin Mk4 crashed in Devon. Same aircraft. Investigation open. Not grounded. Used anyway. Chris Gayson. Lily-Mae Fisher. Owen Green. Lily-Mae never got her wings. They were due this month. He spent years trying to destroy soldiers like them. Then used what is left of them to save himself. Our soldiers deserved better than being props in his political survival film.