I do not post this lightly.
I have been made aware of specific, credible threats against Luis Elizondo.
At this time, I am unaware of specific, credible threats against other confirmed or prospective UAP whistleblowers.
@patternspodcast Of the thousands of "experts" who could have been asked, he was asked to be there—you know, just randomly—and then randomly assigned to head AARO.
Oops.
Hypothesis:
@MickWest is *largely* a fraud (not unlike his fraudulent generational predecessors, Donald Menzel and Phil Klass)
Evidence:
He steadfastly refuses to engage with data and evidence pointing to unambiguously anomalous incidents.
See, e.g., the below for starters:
The Bottom Line:
AARO, at least under Kirkpatrick, has proven to be a thoroughly disingenuous actor (see, e.g., the “Eglin UAP” report, Kirkpatrick’s absurd “Gimbal”comments).
Grusch, on the other hand, testified *under oath,* with a *former IC IG* sitting directly behind him.
It's another example of asymmetry being applied. Skeptics demand proof and methods from the claimants, but the DOD gets to give conclusions and no data. The DOD also gets to veto the claimants' ability to provide verified data.
Rules for thee but not for me.
That's not how science is done.
Exactly right, Ross! "no video exists and nothing to see here folks...well, ok, actually, there IS a video but we can't release it because its too sensitive, of an event that wasn't sensitive." What type of logic is that?