The biggest legal risks? Usually, the ones you don't see coming.
Join @ryandavidwill & @fer_hinoc of @AshburyLegal with us in NYC for their workshop on how to spot—and sidestep—the landmines waiting for onchain startups.
#ExperienceAptos | Oct. 15-16, 202The biggest legal risks? Usually, the ones you don't see coming.
Join @ryandavidwill & @fer_hinoc of @AshburyLegal with us in NYC for their workshop on how to spot—and sidestep—the landmines waiting for onchain startups.
#ExperienceAptos | Oct. 15-16, 2025
Ashbury is proud to be named by Chambers as a top fintech law firm in California.
@ChambersGuides recently started highlighting small to medium-sized law firms that provide “a credible alternative to big law.” In its inaugural California edition, Ashbury is one of two law firms to earn the distinction in the fintech category.
We’ve always known that big law is not for everyone – especially cutting-edge technologists navigating uncharted waters. Recognition by an organization as prestigious as Chambers means we are no longer alone in that view.
I do know that feeling of finding a great place to work.
Ashbury is hiring a Corporate Associate. If you're into emerging tech and high-quality clients check it out. 👇
You know that feeling when you’ve found your dream job? No?
That’s because you’re not at Ashbury yet.
Our Corporate Associate role is built for attorneys with a passion for, and experience with, emerging tech. Join a fast-growing, innovative firm where you’ll work on high-impact deals for high-caliber clients.
Check it out and apply today!
https://t.co/YxGmAdX2kS
The best tool in crypto legal research is now live!
Crypto Legal Ledger provides easy access to a vast database of crypto-related cases, allowing you to stay ahead of legal trends, streamline decision-making, and tap into curated expertise to make well-informed, timely decisions about your project and legal strategy.
Check it out at:
https://t.co/Wu9xJV2wja
Exciting times! Check out our beta tool for tracking all the latest legal developments in blockchain.
Your feedback can help us make it even better. Let us know what you think!
Woohoo! Beta testing for the Crypto Legal Ledger has officially launched! 🚀
Every legal development affecting crypto is now just a click away.
Sign up here if you’d like to give it a spin and let us know what you think:
https://t.co/fDUCL3ZQWx
Woohoo! Beta testing for the Crypto Legal Ledger has officially launched! 🚀
Every legal development affecting crypto is now just a click away.
Sign up here if you’d like to give it a spin and let us know what you think:
https://t.co/fDUCL3ZQWx
I'm excited to share the latest innovation from @AshburyLegal.
The beta version of our Crypto Legal Ledger is here and we invite you to test-drive it. This advanced and user-friendly tool is designed to keep you on top of crypto litigation. Click the link below for access to over 150 critical U.S. crypto developments.
Sign up for the beta here 👉: https://t.co/mjxQ5IGjwc
#cryptolegalledger
@ryandavidwill@chrisnovaklaw@Nimathefish@michaella_gallo
We’re excited to announce the upcoming launch of our latest innovation, The Crypto Legal Ledger. This tool consolidates critical cryptocurrency-related litigation, legislation and rule-making information into a user-friendly platform.
Join the beta test 👉 https://t.co/4jhSETIl2b
I applaud and appreciate @a16zcrypto's continued thought leadership and crypto-native compliance strategies, but I don't think this is the silver bullet for fee distribution that people think it is.
IMHO, this solves an interesting problem that no one really cares about (at least not yet). Specifically, how to let token holders claim protocol fees only when the front end that generated those fees is compliant in the token holders' jurisdiction.
Meanwhile, it gives only cursory treatment to the elephant in the room: How to distribute fees to token holders without making the token a security.
They acknowledge that "combining voting and economic rights may raise concerns under U.S. securities laws." But then they describe a solution that "rewards token holders for participation in governance."
WAIT...I thought "combining voting and economic rights" was the problem. 🤔
I agree with the premise that requiring token holders to contribute to the ecosystem in exchange for a reward is the right way to think about "fee switches." I just wish that topic was the focus of this publication.
Incredible moments at #WakeAndShake during #Consensus2024.
Thanks to @doodles and everyone who joined us for a fantastic start to the day!
See y’all next year. 🚀
I had a great time creating this with @michaella_gallo.
Would love to hear what you all think about it. And let me know if you have any ideas to make it better for future years to come.
Headed to #Consensus2024 and not sure what to do? Don't worry, we got you. We've put together a calendar of all the side events we could find. 🔎
Check it out ⤵️
https://t.co/UVaOd9MeTC