@namedesnutzers1@StefanMolyneux Work ethic (change incentives to what smart people want instead of what midwits want)
Procrastination (see above)
Discipline (see above)
Leadership and communication skills (develop proper buffers between the intelligent and the rabble. A middleman is typically needed)
@billgearon3@StefanMolyneux If they are actually high IQ they know better but that are gaming the system on their behalf. Having a high IQ doesn’t make you a good person.
@shadesofsense@StefanMolyneux This is largely due to emotional regulation (temperament) , foolhardiness (an inherent positive in risk/reward assessment), and percieved confidence (those who don’t know what they don’t know act like they know). Life is complicated so intelligence can lack a decisive edge.
@jackburton109@Barnabeejones54@UnscriptedJacon@StefanMolyneux 1% inspiration (reading others’ scientific findings while working at the patent office) and 99% perspiration (never getting found out while also parlaying his perceived intellect into some communist political propaganda).
@ghostdsg12@uMensGuide@StefanMolyneux You have no idea how quickly they can make a mess of things, impressing most onlookers, before they move onto the next thing. Then, when the issue is found by others, they just blink and think about solving the issue at hand with the root of the cause never addressed.
@samibo77@BigBossGroyp Look man you have some valid points about the drawbacks of high IQ but the truth is that high IQ people are the ONLY ones who thought of anything new. Without them your successful dad would just own the most mud huts
@Johnatwar@ClippyGroypa@BigBossGroyp@CrimzonAF The inability for you to understand the question based on the context alone without getting tripped up on one arbitrary detail that could have been worded differently is ironic on levels that I wish you could understand
@Brendan89359996@ClippyGroypa@BigBossGroyp@CrimzonAF Hahaha man it’s amazing how you 100IQs can get it so twisted. There are 2 SIMPLE factors in this puzzle, time (color change) and position (beginning). It’s not that complicated
@warcroft@ClippyGroypa@BigBossGroyp@CrimzonAF Also the arrow isn’t implied to change colors across the arrow top to bottom or otherwise. The ENTIRE arrow uniformly changes from yellow to green lol
@warcroft@OnlyMalinois@ClippyGroypa@BigBossGroyp@CrimzonAF@grok Do you really think they would structure the question to be impossible to answer and sell it as a basic logical deduction check? Your desire to novelty take basic logic wreaks of midwitery.
@itispsychomath Asking what their beliefs will produce will trigger a “general pushback = attack” response from most because they don’t actually view it as a decision in the first place. Their positions amount to a subconscious survival mechanism similar to the fear of heights.
@TimBolerSh@ApollonianGerm@StefanMolyneux So essentially what you are claiming is that one must FIRST develop the concept of distinct identity before he can differentiate between various distinct,observable qualities received by the senses? How would one develop this ability without innate existence of the defined form?
@temp_softmax@revenant_MMXX Yeah but it was “behind closed doors” so it doesn’t matter, ok?! Watching porn is yucky but being a charity prostitute is a personal, private choice.
@mduke2k@Tr00peRR What’s funny about that is the fact that a fake right and fake left has been created and propped up to get people to believe that “right wing whites” and “left wing pro-islamists” have any direct problem with eachother to begin with. They have both been tricked by a third party