as an actual therapist who also is heavily involved in fandom spaces, I am going to make this thread about proshippers + their arguments for protecting pedophilia.
tldr: consuming + being consistently aroused by fictional fantasies of children is textbook, clinical pedophilia 🧵
@samcentric readers who value distinct authorial voices tend to value authorship higher than those who don’t. they will follow authors from fandom to fandom because they enjoy that author’s style/voice/themes. that’s the curiosity i’m referring to.
everyone in this thread has me blocked so I can’t reply but … yeah you’re right lol. I can’t name my favorite ao3 author because I don’t have one… I don’t read fanfic for the authors. I read it for the characters. sorry if that makes me evil to you guys idrc
@samcentric now, that person could very well be fooled if the ai-generated work was promoted to be in the author’s style, but that’s not usually what happens. ai was trained on what has long been described as “ao3 house style” and therefore lack distinct authorial voice.
@samcentric i’d describe of it more as a failure of intellectual curiosity than of intelligence itself. an intelligent person operating in good-faith could be fooled by ai.
@nottheribbons@samcentric my “theory” as you call it is that people who are indifferent to authorship are at greater risk of consuming ai-produced fic than those aren’t, especially in mega-fandoms like HR where ai use is more common. the fact a popular HRwriter was using ai does not disprove my “theory”
@samcentric the presumption is that this type of person (this is a generalizing statement; i do not know or care about your friend in particular) would not recognize the ai authored works as ai.
@samcentric someone who doesn’t care enough to pay attention to who is authoring the stories they read is much more likely to read stories without authors than someone who does! especially in mega-fandoms, where the demand for content is high and the integrity of many people is low.