Why do people hate Elon for becoming a trillionaire? Like the man actually builds stuff and more or less deserves it. I don't understand why people are so petty.
The judge who let this murderer free should be charged with the murder of the police officer.
We need to start holding judges accountable for their decisions.
A judge is not in the business of serving compassion. They are in the business of serving justice.
I say there needs to be a law that if a judge sentences a criminal to 80% or less of the max sentence they bear responsibility for any actions the defendant commits for the entirety of the time of the max sentence after sentencing.
For instance, if the max sentence is 3 years but the judge only gives 1 year, then the judge is responsible for anything the defendant does for 2 year after his release.
This will give judges skin in the game and make sure our justice system remains just. If you commit a crime you serve your time. Period.
Compassion towards criminals is cruelty towards innocents.
https://t.co/scteAprr3a
I don't waste my energy on people who immediately respond to with ad hominem.
It's a sign of uninterested, unserious low IQ person who does not enjoy the art of debate and conversation.
Nor are they capable of having one tbh.
So many people keep telling me gas powered cars are better than battery powered electric ones.
And that may be the case today.
But I feel like they're not seeing the bigger picture.
The potential for electric cars is much higher than that of gas powered ones.
With the constant possible advancement in battery technology, we may be seeing electric cars able to go 5000+ miles on one charge.
Whereas with gas, you can't really do that because your limited on the car's gas tank.
This is not even considering the benefits of things like immediate torque, acceleration etc...
I don't think we are in an AI bubble. I think AI is holding up its weight.
The dawn of the internet during the dot-com bubble did not accelerate production in most cases. It merely accelerated distribution.
AI, on the other hand, accelerates all phases:
- Information gathering
- Production
- Distribution
- Analysis
The costs savings AI bring are primarily time based cost savings at the moment. And this generally comes from having to pay employees for only 2 months as opposed to 8 for example. This will not always be the case however.
Currently AI is primarily booming on the software level. There will come a time when robots will complete all production, including manufacturing, without the need of many (or any) humans.
Vehicle AI robots are the easiest way to expand because humans are merely a "middle man" who uses vehicles as an extension of their bodies. We have AI based self driving cars and trucks. The next logical step is AI based construction vehicles. Then AI based farming vehicles. Then comes robots who have bodies specifically created to fulfill specific trades based jobs much more efficient than a human.
When all this starts to happen, production value will no longer primarily be on the software or service level. There will be real production of physical goods like foods and houses. All this production will be created without the need to pay human salaries which account for a massive chunk of company expenses nowadays.
(All this does not take into account the potential to accelerate R&D which will exponentially increase production speed and decrease production costs.
And let's not even get started on the fact that in the dot-com bubble this most pumps were coming from internet-centric companies who had nothing but a website. Whereas the current market has massive investments in both AI-centric and AI-tangent companies (like NVDA) that actually build products.)
Anyway, When this happens I think we should really start to look seriously into some form of UBI that won't destroy the economy. Maybe something like a UBI-free market hybrid where all people get the bare necessities then the rest goes to the free market for those who want more luxuries. Our current economic models don't really take automatic production of goods into account.
Either way, in the end I think the potential output for AI will be much higher than the current investment into AI centric and AI tangent companies. So I don't really think it's a bubble.
I've been trying to increase my R:R by catching bigger moves.
I realized that it's better to just try getting better entries with tighter stop losses instead.
@elonmusk I feel like eventually putting all our compute off planet would be ideal. Any plans for this in the near future?
This would not only be beneficial for SpaceX but would solve a lot of problems huge data centres have been causing (and people complaining about) lately.
We’ve agreed to a partnership with @SpaceX that will substantially increase our compute capacity.
This, along with our other recent compute deals, means that we’ve been able to increase our usage limits for Claude Code and the Claude API.
As @farmingandJesus said the Bible is very clear that widows are free to remarry.
1 Cor 7:39 (explicit)
1 Tim 5:14 (Paul even recommends it)
It's for this reason the vows taken are till death. The classic "till death do us part" stems from this idea.
I mean you're free to hold this standard that you imposed on yourself, but imposing it on others is no different then the Pharisees imposing non-biblical amoral based traditions on the others.
Something Jesus always reprimanded by saying "have you not read..."