#MyJihad - To make a better world for our children & grandchildren, free from Cultural Marxism & Islamic Totalitarianism/Supremacism. What's Yours? #TGDN#PJNET
John Clauser, Premio Nobel per la Fisica 2022: «Posso affermare con grande certezza che non esiste alcuna emergenza climatica.
Per quanto ciò possa turbare molte persone, il mio messaggio è chiaro: il pianeta non è in pericolo.
L’anidride carbonica e il metano in atmosfera esercitano un effetto del tutto trascurabile sul clima.
Le politiche finora adottate dai governi risultano quindi inutili e andrebbero semplicemente abbandonate. Finora abbiamo identificato in modo completamente errato il processo dominante che governa il clima: tutti i modelli climatici si basano su una fisica incompleta e scorretta.
Il meccanismo principale è quello che definisco “termostato di riflessività nuvole-luce solare”. Le nubi, essendo bianche e altamente riflettenti, rimandano nello spazio circa il 90 % della luce solare incidente: rappresentano così l’elemento più cruciale, e al tempo stesso più trascurato, del sistema climatico.
Due terzi della superficie terrestre sono occupati dagli oceani; il solo Oceano Pacifico copre circa metà del pianeta.
La copertura nuvolosa media globale è del 67 % (circa il 50% sulle terre emerse e il 75% sugli oceani). Sostengo che proprio queste proprietà evidenti e determinanti delle nubi costituiscano il pezzo mancante del puzzle climatico.
Una volta compreso il ruolo di questo meccanismo termostatico naturale, appare chiaro perché non vi sia alcun rischio di collasso climatico.”
Bisogna smettere di vivere nell’ansia permanente di un’apocalisse climatica che non esiste. La Terra non è un paziente in terapia intensiva: è un sistema robusto, governato da meccanismi naturali potentissimi come l'attività solare, gli oceani, le nubi, i ghiacci, ecc, che da milioni di anni stabilizzano il clima senza bisogno di panico, di politiche punitive o di sacrifici inutili. L’unica vera emergenza è quella di tornare a ragionare con la scienza vera, non con la paura.
“Bill Maher CHALLENGES Charlie Rose on Islam: “Find Me a Moderate Muslim”
Charlie Rose: Would you come to this table and have a debate about this with a moderate Muslim?
Bill Maher: Find one, yes. Find one.
I saw Howard Dean on TV, and he said,
“I'm about as Islamic as they are,” distancing the vast numbers of Islamic people around the world from that. That's just not true.
Charlie Rose: It is true.
Bill Maher: It is not true, Charlie. There is a connecting tissue between
Charlie Rose: You mean, behind every Muslim is a future member of some radical
Bill Maher: Let me finish.
Speaker (Islam Net): How many of you agree that the punishments described in the Quran and the Sunnah, whether it is death, whether it is stoning for adultery if it is from Allah and His Messenger, that is the best punishment ever possible for humankind?
Who agrees with that?
Allahu Akbar. Are you all radical extremists?
Bill Maher: There are illiberal beliefs that are held by vast numbers of Muslim people.
Charlie Rose: Vast number of Christians, too.
Bill Maher: No, you know, that's not true.
Speaker (Islam Net): These are general views that every Muslim actually has. Every Muslim believes in these things. Just because they are not telling you about it doesn't mean they don't believe in that.
Bill Maher: Vast numbers of Christians do not believe that if you leave the Christian religion, you should be killed for it.
Vast numbers of Christians do not treat women as second-class citizens. Vast numbers of Christians do not believe that if you draw a picture of Jesus Christ, you should get killed for it.
But most Muslim people in the world do condone violence just for what you think.
Charlie Rose: How do you know that?
Bill Maher: First of all, they say it. There's a Pew poll of Egypt from a few years ago: 82%, I think it was, said stoning is the appropriate punishment for adultery; over 80% thought death was the appropriate punishment for leaving the Muslim religion.
Charlie Rose: Well, I do.
Bill Maher: So to claim that this religion is like other religions is just naive and plain wrong. It is not like other religions.
Charlie Rose: I don't think the Quran teaches them to do these kind of
Bill Maher: Well, you're wrong about that. The Quran absolutely has on every page stuff that's horrible about how the infidel should be treated.
If you had trusted the settled science of the day, here is how it would have gone.
1890s: you dose the baby with Bayer's new cough syrup, the non-addictive alternative to morphine, marketed for children. It was heroin. They named it after the German for heroic.
1900s: you rub calomel teething powder on your infant's gums. It is a mercury compound, and it leaves a generation with pink disease. Swollen, peeling hands and feet, screaming for months, and some of them died.
1910s: you cook in Crisco, launched by a soap and candle company, because cottonseed oil is modern and lard is what your mother used. The process that made it solid produced trans fat, banned outright a century later.
1920s: you drink Radithor, certified radioactive water, on prescription. Eben Byers took fourteen hundred bottles for his vitality. His jaw was removed in pieces and he was buried in a lead coffin.
1930s: a chemist dissolves a new sulfa drug in diethylene glycol, which is antifreeze. It kills 107 people, mostly children, and only then does America give the FDA power to demand safety testing.
1940s: your doctor lights a Camel in the surgery. More doctors smoke them than any other brand, and the advert runs in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which sold him the page.
1950s: DDT is sprayed over your kitchen, your garden and your children at school. The man who found its insecticidal properties has already been given a Nobel Prize.
1960s: your wife takes thalidomide for morning sickness because it is remarkably safe. More than ten thousand children are born with missing and shortened limbs.
1970s: the country puts down the butter and picks up the margarine, on the instruction of the American Heart Association. The fat everybody switched to was banned in 2015 as unsafe at any level.
1980s: the fat comes out of everything and sugar goes back in to make it edible. Obesity begins a climb it has never come off.
1990s: your father is prescribed OxyContin, because fewer than one per cent get addicted. The company later pleads guilty to criminal misbranding, and the overdose count runs into hundreds of thousands.
2000s: you take Vioxx for your knee. It is pulled in 2004, and the FDA's own safety officer estimates tens of thousands of excess heart attacks.
Not one of those was fringe. Every one had a professional body, a literature and a man in a white coat standing behind it.
Nobody who followed that advice was stupid. They were obedient, to the most qualified people available.
Settled is a word about money. It means the questions stopped being funded, so they stopped being asked.
So which of today's instructions will your grandchildren read out in disbelief.
The oil washed in hexane and built into every cell you own. The statin that blocks the pathway making your hormones, to prevent one heart attack per hundred people. The injection where a third of the loss is muscle. The infant formula built out of vegetable oil.
All settled. None of it funded to be otherwise.
Extracts from article in Spectator 16th August by Brendan O’Neill:
Behold the human wreckage of the cult of diversity. The tragedy of Jason Arday is that he was both built up and destroyed by the ruthless machinery of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion). The academy made him into the golden boy of its philistine project of ‘decolonisation’ and gave not one thought to what the consequences might be if his thin story unravelled, as it inevitably would. No one can deny it now: wokeness makes false gods and real tragedies. . .
This is the poison chalice of the state religion of diversity. It lays traps for the very people it celebrates. It handpicks members of ‘the oppressed’ for moral anointment and institutional gushing while leaving them open to exposure as others start to query their credentials. That’s the toxic bargain of identity politics: it builds teetering pedestals for ethnic-minority thinkers, meaning their fall from grace is often twice as fatal.
And what a pedestal they made for Arday. They worshipped him as ‘the best in the world’. They beatified him as a black wunderkind whose very presence in a place like Cambridge might help to wash away its sins of whiteness. They canonised him as a living monument to ‘decolonisation’. It was precisely this, their giddy, narcissistic desire to manufacture a kind of black saviour, that made them turn a blind eye to the questionable elements of Arday’s CV and life story. They sacrificed their due diligence to the god of decolonisation.
And Arday suffered. He was both poster boy and sacrificial lamb of the diversity crusade. Even as he gained from it – reaching the dizzying heights of a Cambridge professorship – he was being damned by it. The foundation of myth and sand his starry career was built on was untenable. Its collapse was a given. It is a testament to the ideological blindness of the inhabitants of our ivory towers that none of them foresaw it. . . .
The Faustian ruthlessness of it all is mindblowing.
. . . The media is the only institution in this entire tragic scandal that did its job properly. Journalists found a story and they told it. It was the academy and Arday’s colleagues who failed to do their jobs. Who failed to prize merit over identity, and failed to foresee the public embarrassment that would befall their falsely promoted friend. They ignored the truth – the media found it.
I and others have been arguing for years that the politics of identity is a disaster for all, black and white alike. White kids are overlooked, black kids are patronised. Whites are branded ‘privileged’, blacks ‘oppressed’. Whites are seen as the beneficiaries of historic crimes who must atone for past sins, blacks as history’s perma-victims who require the gracious helping hand of the state. We are demonised or infantilised according to the accident of our race.
Enough. Let our monument to Jason Arday be the restoration of the true ideal of equality. We couldn’t save Jason but we can save merit from the monstrous jaws of identity.
Iran’s Islamic regime sat across the table demanding reparations for the damage done to their ballistic missile and nuclear sites.
President Trump didn’t flinch. He told them reparations are a great idea. Then he flipped the entire table.
Iran’s rulers will pay the American families whose loved ones were murdered by Iranian-backed terrorism. Iran’s tyrants will pay the families of the tens of thousands of Iranian protesters the regime slaughtered in January. Iran’s regime will pay for half a century of blood it has spilled across the region.
The Islamic regime that hangs teenagers from cranes, funds Hamas and Hezbollah, and spent decades racing toward a ballistic missile program and nuclear facilities suddenly wants to play the victim of Islamophobia because someone finally held them to account and destroyed their attempt to acquire weapons of mass destruction.
The only person responsible for Jason Arday's death is Jason Arday.
He was a liar and a fraud who was rightly exposed for what he really was by academics and journalists who were simply doing their job.
No one forced Arday to make up lie after lie about his life. He chose to do that. And he did it for financial gain and to bask in the applause it brought him.
He used those lies to deceive people into giving him a job he didn't merit, a lucrative book deal he didn't deserve, as well as fame and adulation he didn't earn.
And when he was found out, he called in the police and expensive lawyers to shut his accusers up, and his failed students who complained were branded as racist.
Cambridge University and Jesus College enabled this liar by lauding him as brilliant when he wasn't even mediocre. They should ask themselves why they put their DEI religion above the need for fairness in their appointments processes, above the needs of Arday's students and, most importantly, above the truth.
Arday's family and friends should ask themselves why they chose not to speak out to expose his lies which they must have known to be untrue.
The police should ask themselves why they thought it acceptable to investigate an academic and a journalist simply for asking questions about Arday's fraudulent CV.
The BBC and Arday's many other deluded cheerleaders should ask themselves why they were so desperate to believe Arday's outlandish claims in the face of all the evidence.
The thousands of the great and the good in academia, politics, media and law who signed the Good Law Project letter backing Arday should ask themselves why, without any justification, they outrageously branded Arday's critics as racists who just wanted to bring down a successful black man because of the colour of his skin.
All of these people made their own contributions to Jason Arday's life. And arguably all of them contributed in some way to his decision to take his own life when his fantastical claims were finally exposed for what they really were: lies.
The idea that those who exposed Arday as a lying fraudster are to blame for his death is as laughable as it is outrageous.
The idea that Arday was "hounded" to his death is absurd. He chose to tell every single lie himself and he even chose to continue those lies in his resignation letter from Cambridge. He is not the victim. He is the perpetrator.
The claim that Arday's downfall was only a front page story because he was black is also ridiculous. He chose to tell the lies that made him a front page story in the first place.
I feel sorry for those who loved him. It is very sad that he has chosen to take his own life rather than face the consequences of his own actions, which should have resulted in a criminal conviction for fraud.
But actions have consequences. This isn't about right and left. It's about right and wrong.
Dear Muslims: My family and I have decided to move from the US to a Muslim country. We haven't picked which one yet—we're still comparing which one offers the best benefits package.
All my neighbors want to come too. And my neighbors' neighbors. And all their friends. And their friends' friends. Millions of us will show up with suitcases and a sense of entitlement.
As a large Christian community, we'll need a few small changes: Please start building churches immediately. Real churches, with nice loud bells, the kind that can be heard from the town square.
We'll also need for everyone to celebrate Christmas, and to close certain streets once a year for our processions. We may want to gather to pray to our Almighty God on your streets, in your parks, or on the lawns of your mosques.
We'll be an oppressed minority, so you'll have to be understanding and adapt to our way of life. Every supermarket must stock real pork, ham, chorizo, and bacon. And we're bringing all our dogs, so you'll need dog parks, and you'll have to smile tolerate them we walk them in front of your mosques. We want our women to be able to safely go out alone and wear shorts and tank tops. And when the weather's nice, we men like to go shirtless. We also want to drink alcohol, dance, and place an occasional bet at the horse races.
While we're at it, your religious holidays are a bit too much; they could offend the Christian community, so we'd appreciate it if you'd discreetly eliminate them. Thanks.
In schools and workplaces, our children and employees must be able to wear large crucifixes, say prayers, eat ham sandwiches in the cafeteria, and learn Christian principles without anyone getting criticized. We also demand chapels or Christian prayer rooms in every building, plus translators, because we have no intention of learning Arabic.
If any of this is rejected, please send a list of police station addresses so we can report you for discrimination, Christianophobia, racism, and anything we don't like.
One more thing: if my kids protest or burn your flag for any reason, please be understanding. I'll be sure to give them a very serious scolding.
Finally, we all want generous benefits, free housing, phones, free food, and pocket money while we "integrate" over the next three generations. Working is optional, obviously. Be patient with us, you'll get used to it.
We thank you in advance for your tolerance and compassion. After all, diversity is our strength!
Sincerely,
A Very Reasonable Christian
They tried their best to utterly SCRUB this video from the internet!
Some of us kept copies!
THIS is the infamous video where Bill Gates ADMITS to depopulating the world with VACCINES!
WATCH IT
SAVE IT
SHARE IT!
Here at the bonfire in #Moygashel. And let me tell you, I am shocked and horrified.
We need Sadiq Kunt here immediately with some public prayers for the Mujahideen @SadiqKhan
One of the most thought provoking speeches I've seen in a while.
@Miss_Snuffy on how raising a generation to see the world through oppressors and the oppressed is changing the West.
If you don't have time, bookmark it. It's worth every second.
WATCH:
HOLY SHIT.
A senior police officer has just admitted to two-tier policing in Birmingham.
When asked why there were almost no police present during violent unrest, he said they “met with community leaders,” allowed the community to “police within themselves,” and chose a “style of policing” because a “small minority of criminals” would attack officers.
Translation: They stood down because certain communities threatened violence against the police — and the police decided it was better for the narrative to let them run wild than to enforce the law.
This is not policing. This is surrender.
Britain now has areas where the state has ceded control to parallel societies that openly threaten violence if the law is applied equally.
The mask is off.
Two-tier policing is real. The police are afraid of certain groups. And the British people are paying the price.
This ends when we say it ends.
Restore law and order. End two-tier policing now.
A school teacher called me a “racist c*nt” while I was minding my own business.
So I stopped and asked a few simple questions.
If you’re so convinced I’m wrong, why can’t you answer basic facts?
Watch what happens when emotion collides with reality.
The people screaming “racist” the loudest are often the people who know the least.
If you live in or around Kingston Upon Thames, this woke woman could be teaching YOUR kids!
Living in the UK is now incredibly radicalising. This is what we have seen in the last two weeks alone: a gang of Afghans who entered the country illegally on small boats and lorries have been charged with 40 child sex offences: two Muslim men who visibly assaulted police officers have been let off from a further trial; a small boat migrant living in a taxpayer-funded hotel was found guilty of sexually assaulting two women outside nightclubs; an Islamist terrorist who plotted to blow up an army base is being released early; a white British boy was handcuffed by police and bled to death while saying “I can’t breathe” after the Sikh boy who murdered him claimed the white boy was “racist”; a Muslim man who called to “behead the Jews” was released on bail while white British people who tweeted their complaints about immigration have been jailed; a group of boys who gang-r*ped and filmed two girls escaped jail and were given fines of £26; a new study found that for every ONE young British person who is hired in Britain TWENTY-SEVEN young migrants from outside Europe; Islamic prayers are now routinely used to open local councils; another 1,000 illegals arrived on small boats in one weekend; it was revealed the First Lady of Sierra Leone owns a council flat in London while 1.3 million people wait on the social housing list; new data revealed that last year alone 800,000 migrants arrived in Britain while 246,000 British people left, half of whom are aged 16-34 years old; the country’s birth-rate collapsed to a new low of 1.39 while politicians refuse to even talk about how to support British families; a grooming gang in Dewsbury was jailed for nearly 300 years combined after assaulting children as young as 12. Oh, and the entire political class had a nervous breakdown when the British people decided to peacefully protest over what is happening to their country on the streets of their capital city.
As I say, radicalising.
John of Damascus lived close to the time Islam first appeared and directly witnessed its rise.
He called Muhammad a false prophet who borrowed ideas from the Bible and mixed them with Arab beliefs to create a new religion.
He questioned why Muhammad claimed private revelations with no public witnesses, unlike Moses and the biblical prophets whose signs were seen openly.
What makes this powerful is that this was not a modern critic.
This was one of the earliest Christian scholars living under Muslim rule, and even he concluded that Islam was built from borrowed teachings, not divine revelation.