HOW THEY ENGINEERED THE FAKE PANDEMIC
1. China released staged footage of people “dropping dead” in the streets; scenes never witnessed anywhere else in the world before or after December 2019.
2. A PCR test was rolled out that could not determine whether someone was actually sick. The vast majority of results were false positives.
3. The claim of asymptomatic transmission was heavily promoted to justify restrictions on healthy people and to force mass testing on the entire population; which led to tens of millions of false positive test results.
4. Tech companies and media outlets were mobilized to censor dissent and rebrand inconvenient truths as “misinformation.”
5. Behavioral psychologists were brought in to design fear-based messaging specifically intended to secure public compliance.
6. To keep the illusion of a deadly pandemic alive, they required excess mortality data.
7. Ordinary mild respiratory symptoms alone could not produce those numbers, so the population was subjected to sustained psychological pressure capable of triggering mass psychogenic illness.
8. Relentless fear messaging kept cortisol levels chronically elevated, weakening immune function, particularly among the elderly.
9. Social isolation, delayed medical care, and lockdown policies then generated the excess deaths needed to prop up the narrative.
10. Cloth and surgical masks were suddenly declared effective, something no serious public-health authority had previously recommended for ordinary respiratory pathogens, turning every face into a walking advertisement for fear.
11. People were conditioned to remain isolated “until the vaccine was ready,” buying authorities additional time to expand control.
12. Billions were injected with an experimental product that was claimed to stop both infection and transmission.
13. When those claims collapsed, the goalposts were moved: “Your shot won’t work unless the unvaccinated also take it.”
14. New “variants” were announced every few months to justify an endless series of booster campaigns.
15. A new condition - “long COVID” - was introduced to reframe mounting vaccine side effects.
16. Pharmaceutical companies recorded unprecedented profits, shielded by government contracts and complete legal immunity.
17. Anyone who raised objections was silenced, deplatformed, investigated, or publicly discredited.
18. Once the story became too strained to maintain, the pandemic was abruptly declared over, and the entire episode was treated as if it had never happened.
NEVER FORGET AND PROSECUTE FAUCI!
@Mappy6984 I had this surgery for disc compression C5, C6..it changed my life. The neurologist will only do the operation when your symptoms are severe and the relief is almost instant. Back to normal within 6 weeks .
⚠️Influenza vaccine was not effective last winter.
“It had a negative efficacy of 26.9%. In other words, if you took this flu vaccine, you were 26.9% more likely to get influenza”
Bill Gates' lab-made butter is due to hit the shelves in 2027.
"It looks, smells, and tastes like the butter we're all familiar with, but without the farmland, fertilisers, or emissions."
Bill Gates: "The idea of switching to lab-made fats and oils may seem strange at first, but their potential to significantly reduce our carbon footprint is immense."
"This is really about how we feed our species and heal our planet at the same time."
No, this is really about getting rid of agriculture and seizing control of the global food supply, as a means of controlling the global population.
The truth about yesterdays event in London from Trevor Phillips, who actually mingled with and observed those attending the event. Please watch and share.
A very balanced commentary by Sir Trevor Phillips on the protest march in London yesterday. But so many of political commentariat refuse to be as balanced in their own assessments. The public mood has shifted and that’s because the concerns of millions people are still being ignored or sneered at by the political establishment - both in terms of politicians and also media.
Interesting. Why would the BBC want to diminish the numbers attending a Freedom of speech festival ? Why would they want to magnify allegations of violence and disorder and amplify the size of a small counter protest ?
I am getting the distinct impression that the BBC might not be onside !!!!
▪️Cost of living crisis.
▪️£50bn new black hole.
▪️200,000 job losses.
▪️Punishing pensioners with the winter fuel allowance removal.
▪️Punishing the disabled with welfare cuts.
▪️Chagos deal.
▪️Punishing farmers.
▪️Selling out fishing communities
▪️Punishing small businesses.
▪️Betraying WASPI women.
▪️Increased council tax.
▪️Increased energy bills.
▪️50,000 small boat crossings.
▪️Hotels for illegal migrants crisis.
▪️Rayner.
▪️Mandelson.
▪️Moving towards digital ID.
▪️Solar panels on thousands of acres of prime farmland.
▪️£800m wasted on paying to turn wind turbines off
▪️£30bn carbon capture machines.
▪️Scrapping new oil and gas licenses in the North Sea but paying Norway £40bn for imported oil and gas from the North Sea.
▪️A Prime Minister who completely fails to understand the public mood, is in thrall to the likes of Davos and BlackRock and yet lectures everyone like they are somehow beneath him.
The worst 16 months of a new government in living memory.
It should be all over for the pro vaccine agenda . A pro vaccine group of scientists studied vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. Their results destroy the ‘safe and effective’ narrative. Where are @MattHancock@RishiSunak@chriswitty et al ? You can only suppress the truth for so long.
I will not be having a digital ID because if I say yes to this I will never be able to say no to the government again. What will you say ?
PS I didn’t realise Macron was deciding UK policy now.
I see ID cards are back. Many years ago, I had the inenvious task of being one of the architects of one part of last attempt in the 2000s - Enrolling the population. I felt physically sick going into work, and left the company soon after. A wise choice considering what transpired years later.
This is what I know. First, enrolling the population. How? Bank records, not everyone has an account, Tax, the same, NI, how about Children? DVLA... Passport data. So, it will need legislation and none of this IT 'talks' to each other either. ££££ in cost.
So, it will rely on self-attestation, this will mean that criminals can apply for a fake ID (and illegal migrants). Flaw 1.
What happens if someone steals your ID? How do you prove that you are you? This is 'non-repudiation'. The data I have covered, so what makes you unique? Fingerprints and DNA. There is a slight problem, that's the domain of law enforcement, criminals and suspects. It is not to prove who you are. So, want a secure system, it will hand over your fingerprint. For what purpose? Flaw 2.
Flaw 1 and 2 now make it an incredible target for Cybercrime. This is the same Civil Service that sent the details of 26m workers and their children's details through the post and lost it. Flaw 3.
Flaw 4, data accuracy, no database is 100% accurate. Even it was the most accurate in the world (99.9999%), the details of tens of thousands would be wrong, back to Flaw 2.
These are the major reasons. There are others.
Most European countries have ID cards, they have not halted fraud, theft, and terrorism. If anything, they provide a false security. Why? The terrorists had ID cards. Bataclan, Charlie Hebdo, Nice...
Last, most European countries have a stricter interpretation of GDPR, their privacy is better guarded.
Can we trust our Government not to misuse it? We get locked up for spicy tweets.
It is a wholly false premise, a lie, deeply dystopian, and fortunately for us, it would take years to complete the work.
It is HERE there is the uncomfortable truth. The current passport system is the old ID Card system from the late 2000s. Guess what? Migrants get a form of ID card from that system already.
Why do the Government need a new ID card? It ain't for stopping boats.
Thanks for reading.