@betorn@ElvisUSA@jonaaronbray@RealCandaceO@paleochristcon Yes thank you, finally someone who understands ballistics, obviously the air displacement from the muzzle doesn’t cause Charlie’s shirt to move, it’s the bullet at impact.. the video they made is pointless in that they don’t shoot an object or recreate a person being shot
@ElvisUSA@jonaaronbray@RealCandaceO@paleochristcon The projection here is crazy.. yes again for the thousandth time I have already acknowledged Andrew messed up by using the wrong term.. he said air dispersal but should have said air displacement.. again chalk up another response showing you don’t read my responses
@ElvisUSA@jonaaronbray@RealCandaceO@paleochristcon I have multiple times, explained the bullet at impact transfers kinetic energy and a shockwave that causes the shirt to move.. the only one with issues reading is you.. stop making this worse for yourself, the more you respond the more you lose.. just take the L and move on
@IanCarrollShow You are not an expert on ammo.. you proved that with not knowing the difference between FMJ and soft point rounds.. people use the internet, it exists for a reason
@ElvisUSA@jonaaronbray@RealCandaceO@paleochristcon No I’m pretty sure it was, does a bullet hitting a target cause air displacement? So thank you for proving my points.. the only one pivoting here is you.. and by the way never use personal attacks in a debate, the moment you did that you lost..
@ElvisUSA@jonaaronbray@RealCandaceO@paleochristcon 🤦🏻♂️ there has been no pivot.. my entire line of questioning has been the same haha.. this is now sad that you won’t admit that which you know is true.. Charlie was shot, the impact of that bullet caused his shirt to move.. that had been my claim and remains my claim
@ElvisUSA@jonaaronbray@RealCandaceO@paleochristcon Again I say his intention not words.. I’ve agreed multiple times on this.. both of them admitted they would make mistakes and did.. but what I’m saying shows that the shirt could move from the impact of the bullet, showing that its possible
@ElvisUSA@jonaaronbray@RealCandaceO@paleochristcon He never specified in his answer that it was before impact, no where in his response does he say that.. again I think his intention is right but wording was wrong.. he said dispersal but should have said displacement, similar but not the same..
@ElvisUSA@jonaaronbray@RealCandaceO@paleochristcon Yes I agree about bullets.. but also when you fire a gun that rapid expansion of gases causes air displacement.. which in theory could cause an empty ammo box to move.. his intention was right but wording was wrong
@ElvisUSA@jonaaronbray@RealCandaceO@paleochristcon They literally say in the video, “ a shockwave needs a medium to move through”.. in this case that’s Charlie and would explain how when the bullet hits his neck it caused his shirt to blow back.. we know that from ballistics and physics
@ElvisUSA@jonaaronbray@RealCandaceO@paleochristcon I do agree that he could have been clearer with his explanation.. but he’s not wrong in that a bullet would cause air displacement with the kinetic energy transfer and shockwave or over pressure from the bullet on impact
@jonaaronbray Go ask any search engine, does a bullet hitting a target cause air displacement? The answer is there for everyone to see.. Andrew was right on this point and it amazes me how ignorant people remain despite the existence of the internet..
@jonaaronbray I want you all to go to google or grok or chatgpt and ask does a bullet hitting a target cause air displacement? The answer is right there and the amount of stupid people that remain ignorant on internet is shocking
@jasonwhitlock@IanCarrollShow None of it matters until the court case, where we will see all of the evidence both sides present.. neither side in the debate did a good job.. it’s all meaningless until the actual trial, neither side will admit they lost it