a mile

Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying. ~ QA amateur

[a mile @cd_efgh]

Prologue:

[Ibrahim Arief @ibamarief]

Besok, apapun keputusan dari Majelis Hakim, akan menentukan masa depan keluarga kami. Masa depan saya sebagai seorang istri bersama kedua anak kami.

Sebelum keputusan besok, perkenankan saya membagikan setidaknya dua fakta yang sudah terungkap di persidangan.

Satu fakta dari sidang bulan lalu, kesaksian di bawah sumpah bahwa aplikasi superapp tidak pernah dirancang atau diarahkan untuk hanya bisa jalan di Chromebook.

Saksi juga menyatakan, tujuan dari superapp ini adalah melayani sebanyak mungkin guru dan murid, jadi bisa jalan di Windows juga.

[Ibrahim Arief @ibamarief]

Saksi Tim Teknis: kajian yang merekomendasikan Chromebook BUKAN atas arahan Ibrahim Arief 🚨

Ibam didakwa membuat kajian 8-16 Juni 2020 yang mengarah pada Chromebook ⚠️

Terungkap dalam sidang: Kajian tersebut dibuat sejak 27 April 2020 atas arahan Cepy Lukman ke Tim Teknis 🚨

[Ibrahim Arief @ibamarief]

Suami saya membuat negara hemat Rp2,5T dari masukannya untuk hapus pengadaan server ujian bagi sekolah siap internet, dan ini terungkap di persidangan.

Bahkan Ahli IT menyetujui, ini adalah masukan terbaik.

Apakah ini, alasan kami dizalimi?

Apakah ada yang tidak suka, kalau Indonesia bisa berhemat triliunan rupiah?

Apakah ada yang terganggu, dengan teknologi yang lebih baik dan tepat sasaran?

Apakah ini, dosa Ibam?

Semoga Allah menunjukkan kebenaran, serta selalu melindungi kami sekeluarga.

[Ibrahim Arief @ibamarief]

Terima kasih Pak @tomlembong sudah bicara di podcast Pak @akbarfaizal68 soal Ibam, tentang betapa semrawutnya proses dari JPU dan tuduhan yang dipaksakan.

"Jangan lelah mencintai Indonesia" jadi pengingat dan penyemangat kami di tengah banyak narasi yang diputarbalikan saat ini.

[Ibrahim Arief @ibamarief]

Kaget banget Mas Ferry bikin video lanjutan terkait kasus Ibam.

Terima kasih telah mendukung hukum yang lebih adil dan baik untuk negara kita tercinta. 🙏🏼🙏🏼

H-6 Sidang Putusan. Mohon bantuan teman-teman sekalian untuk terus #kawalibam sampai bebas.

https://t.co/ITcV2QTKy2

[kia @qincuku]

enduw : “ngerti kan skrg klean kenapa ak gamau sama buna?”
🤣

[Elon Murz | SVP of Meme Engineering @ecommurz]

Found this old chat with @ibamarief. Its deeply saddening to look back at how excited n committed he was to his work, especially during his time in govtech after turning down an offer from Meta 😕

Now he is facing 15 years n potentially 22.5 years if he cant pay the fines. Its a stark reminder for Indo professionals that working for the state can carry SERIOUS personal risk. The system does not protect those who serve it.

[Giri Kuncoro @girikuncoro]

Sebagai engineer Indo yang belajar banyak dari Ibam, baca ini sakit hati rasanya.

Satu-satunya saran buat teman-teman tech di titik ini: usahakan cari jalan untuk berkarier di luar negeri. Kalaupun stay, jauh-jauh dari public sector atau pemerintahan, tetap di private sector.

Teknologi di Indonesia sudah selesai. Investasi terbaik saat ini yang bisa kita berikan buat generasi berikutnya: berkarya sebaik-baiknya di luar negeri dan membangun network seluas-luasnya.

Selamat tinggal keadilan, selamat jalan teknologi Indonesia. Unicorn era was a nice ride.

[Gogo | Dota for Toxicity @lwastuargo]

Faaaaaaaaaaakkkk

[a mile @cd_efgh]

Lesson learned: I won’t be dealing with @samsungID phone anymore. Samsung Care+ feels misleading — my phone died due to water exposure, yet it wasn’t covered. Pretty ironic for a “waterproof” device with so many promises upfront.

[Ibrahim Arief @ibamarief]

Since last year, I've arguably been wrongfully accused in a state corruption case.

To defend my innocence, I spent past 6 weeks building an agentic AI swarm that:

Analyzed 4700+ pages court docs
Mapped 8900+ testimonies
Found dozens of contradictions

This is how I fight 👇🏼

First off, some context may be necessary.

Even though I'm accused in a state corruption case, I'm not a government official. I'm a software engineer. I spent over 15 years building large-scale tech systems across Europe and Indonesia. I've led engineering teams of up to 600 people and helped grow a small tech startup into a unicorn.

In 2016, I moved back from Europe to Indonesia, because I believe technology at scale could make a real difference to the millions of people in the nation.

Six years ago, working as a tech consultant under a nonprofit foundation, I started advising Indonesia's Ministry of Education on building large-scale technology platforms.

Public sector work pays significantly less than private sector, and I took close to a 50% pay cut to make the switch. I was fine with that. Using what I knew to help underserved communities in Indonesia felt like the right trade.

Our mission was to build a user-centric superapp for public education, specifically for teachers and public schools, the kind of work the private sector ignores because there's no money in it.

At some point, officials at the ministry asked for my input on one of their procurement plans. I helped them work through the technical details, shared what I knew, laid out the pros and cons, and recommended a set of tests they should run to determine which options were the most suitable.

By the time they made their final decision and executed the procurement, I had already resigned from the consulting work, so I didn't think much of it.

Fast forward to May 2025. My house was raided as part of a newly opened corruption investigation tied to that procurement. Two months later, I was named a suspect and placed under city detention due to my health.

The trial started in January 2026. We've been through more than a dozen sessions so far, and not a single piece of evidence or testimony has been presented showing I received a single cent from the procurement.

What came to light was the opposite: evidence and testimony that my recommendations were neutral and likely were ultimately ignored by the ministry's own team, who went ahead and made the call on their own.

So why am I the one on trial? Because the ministry officials who did take money from the procurement vendors needed someone to blame for the decisions they made. Blaming an outside consultant is the easy way out.

Witness testimonies in court has shown that the officials actively directed the procurement while claiming it was done on my instructions and even misled their own team within the ministry by saying I held a position of authority.

We needed evidence to dispute those accusations, questions to cross-examine the witnesses, and we needed them fast.

This is where my AI comes in.

A few days before the trial began, we received a 4400-page printed document containing all the witness statements collected during the investigation, plus several hundred pages of other related documents.

The information asymmetry is staggering. Those with deep enough pockets to hire large law firms can throw dozens of paralegals and associates at a document like that and mount a proper defense on short notice.

I didn't have that kind of money. By then, I had been out of work for more than six months. The AI startup I founded had to shut down. Our investors asked us to return their funding. I had to lay off the entire team.

Most of my lawyers are friends of my wife from her college days, who stepped up and waived most of their fees because they could see I was being railroaded.

The whole situation felt hopeless. But somewhere in the middle of the despair, a spark lit up.

Combing through and analyzing thousands of pages of documents is exactly the kind of problem AI was built for.

I've built AI systems before, so I know the key to applying AI to a real-world problem is understanding the strengths and limitations of the available models, and figuring out how to make things not just work, but work efficiently enough to put into production.

I was placed under city detention due to health issues with my heart, compounded by a tumor that has been growing rapidly over the past few months. But it also means I still have access to my dev PC.

So I started with small experiments. My lawyers found a printing service that could scan the thousands of pages in a couple of days. At first, I tried simply uploading the scanned PDF into existing chatbots like ChatGPT, but the file was far too large for anything they could handle.

Even when I managed to get it working through external cloud storage, the results were atrocious. Half of the strategies and "facts" the models surfaced were hallucinations. That wouldn't just be useless in court, it's actively dangerous and can jeopardize my defense.

My experience building complex AI systems told me that the key to reducing those hallucinations is better data preprocessing.

So I spent the first couple of weeks focusing on parsing the uploaded PDFs, running various kinds of text extraction, and eventually settled on building an agentic AI swarm that performs multiple layers of preprocessing and analysis.

This multi-step analysis by several AI agents that swarm the PDF and extract different aspects of the case produces a dense knowledge graph where we can even trace the flow of money involved.

My lawyers can now easily browse, filter, and search through nearly 9000 witness statements. We even discovered several witnesses with duplicate testimony, raising suspicion of coordinated efforts or tampering among them.

But I didn't stop there. The processing chain includes several higher-level intelligence layers that draw from all the signals in the extracted knowledge graph. These layers add semantic understanding that powers a Chat AI feature, where we can ask specific questions about the case and get grounded answers.

I even built a self-reflective sub-agent that automatically challenges and inspects the results to make sure there are zero hallucinations.

Overall, the AI has helped me and my legal team uncover the big picture of what actually happened, and build questions that span hundreds of separate testimony sessions, giving us an unprecedented ability to cross-examine witnesses in court and significantly improved our defenses.

But I have grander vision than just helping my own legal team. Indonesia's legal system is severely overburdened, with a huge number of cases flowing through the courts every year. This kind of AI could be a useful tool not just for lawyers, but also for judges and prosecutors trying to make sense of their caseloads.

With the cross-examinations we've conducted and the weight of evidence that has come to light, we are aiming for an acquittal.

Should that be the case, my pledge is to keep building this AI platform into something that can meaningfully improve the quality of justice in our legal system: by helping investigators analyze cases more thoroughly and shine a light on any potential crimes, by raising the standard of what prosecutors bring before a judge, and by giving lawyers the ability to uncover the truth in their clients' cases faster than ever before.

Because in the end, I want what I've built to help more than just myself. I believe it can ease the burden on our judges and raise the quality of justice across the system in Indonesia.

[Ibrahim Arief @ibamarief]

Saksi kontradiktif! 🚨🤡

Pejabat tuduh Ibam "mengarahkan Chromebook", tapi ketika di bukti notulen Ibam tidak mengarahkan, geser jadi "memaparkan Chromebook"

Lawyer: Kalau arahan, kenapa Ibam bilang "Chromebook perlu diuji" tidak dilakukan?

Saksi: "Saya tidak bisa menjawab"

[Vincent Ricardo (柯仙森) @vincentrcrd]

It's not only Ibrahim Arief or Nadiem who will be impacted by this. Many of highly talented people who want to engage with the government or want to invest here will reevaluate their judgement after knowing the problems of our anti-corruption law and its practice.

[Tom Wright @TomWrightAsia]

Meet Ibrahim Arief. A top-tier Indonesian engineer involved with some of the nation's best-known tech unicorns. Now he's under arrest, awaiting trial in a politicized case that's deeply hurting Indonesia's reputation. His story is distressing. 1/6

[Jimmy Breeze @VanadiumIChing]

@animeposts Admitting that you don’t understand something in order to receive a proper explanation instead of blindly nodding and going “oh yeah yeah I get it” without actually getting it is a brave and correct move.

[a mile @cd_efgh]

@vixtorious Emang nyari budgetnya segitu bang. Hehehe

[Namya @ Supafast @namyakhann]

Easiest ways to sell SaaS:

1. Sell them time (automation, efficiency)
2. Sell them money (ROI, revenue growth)
3. Sell them certainty (analytics, reporting)
4. Sell them simplicity (no-code, easy setup)
5. Sell them growth (scale, expansion)
6. Sell them peace (security, compliance)