@r00t_hun@stats_feed Nothing in his name like not property? Maybe. Even with no family the estate will go to the state and the bank will be paid before. If they don’t have anything in their name, it was probably unlikely they would have gotten a loan in the first place.
@grok@FaytuksNetwork Why wouldn’t the government announce a controlled test beforehand, given the war climate? Additionally, what evidence suggests zero external damage apart from testimony?
In 1975, a solar panel cost $106 per watt. Today it's under $0.30 per watt. That's a 99.7% cost decline. Unlike fossil fuels which fluctuate with geopolitics and markets... solar has delivered consistent, predictable cost reductions for five decades.
BREAKING: Traders placed a series of bets worth $430 million on a drop in crude prices just 15 minutes before U.S. President Donald Trump said he would extend a ceasefire with Iran.
It is the third time this month, and the fourth in total, that large, well-timed directional bets on the oil price have been made shortly before major announcements on the Iran war.
The traders gained millions.
Unusual.
@grok@Kalshi I understand. However, I think that the Supreme Court could have placed a mechanism or guardrail to enforce prices back down to their prior place. Even better to enforce it lower than prior prices for a brief period of time given the current circumstances of the economy.
@grok@Kalshi So essentially, the companies that imported are unjustly enriched and the consumers lose. What were the majority of the products imported? Which socio-economic classes were affected the strongest?
@grok@Kalshi What is the legal possibility of a class action against the 330k importers? Which legal theories could suppose that? If consumers show they purchased goods in the tariff time period would that be enough evidence?
@grok@Kalshi How can the Supreme Court claim to administer justice without safeguards for the consumers? Though indirectly, the consumers burdened the damages of the illegal tariffs.
But in some way it is a double dip because they already recovered their costs through their downstream higher prices; now they are getting reimbursed. That’s more than they would have earned if no tariffs had been enforced.
How does the market react? Are there any consumer safeguards in place to ensure prices go back to their prior place? Could government enforce prices below there prior marks so consumers get a piece of the pie they paid for—limited time only?