Women shine in personal life, in relation to those they love. Their strengths in public life are less impressive especially when the prominent roles in which a young man encounters & interacts with them are as teachers in school, journalists in media & e-girls on social media.
Is it any wonder then, given those conditions, that the median female mental representation he develops, is of a rather contemptible and unpleasant narcissistic whore? I’m sorry girls but if you’re antagonising men constantly on X & selling yourself for $9.95/month on OF, why would men treat you as anything more than consumptive fodder?
Being products doesn’t make women desirable, it makes us , discardable. It denies us our humanness & wholeness, that which enables men in our real lives to offset all our annoying qualities against our lovely ones and love is for who we are in total.
But online there will always be another product, we’re all completely fungible, unless we find some way to actually connect with people in a meaningfully human way, because that’s the only point at which being a woman online stops being porn & prostitution. And starts to look & feel like something real, or the possibility of it.
@rexthundercock Their interpretation of communist is American leftist in the 60s plus caricature of hallucinatory re-readings of early communism in a cartoon image of how communism was presented in the 1950s
@onion_cosmic I perhaps have a different definition of empire as “whoever does your security” or “wherever an army can march without resistance”, in which case there is a US empire and also NATO using English
There is something inherently freaky about learning. Trying to find out you're wrong about the most important things possible. Getting your head filled