red 👻 semi-ia

| WENDY solo stan | Wanso | 와니꺼 🩵 | 🏳️‍🌈 |

[red 👻 semi-ia @celestialshon]

🎶 I got these emotions
In different colors
That I'm sinking under
Can't breathe any longer
It's hard but I'm tryin'
Push it down, tell myself that I'm doing fine
Had my head in the clouds, now I'm fallin' down
I got these emotions 🎶

https://t.co/ha1GOClVNN

[jd @wendy_mocheeks]

happy pride month 🏳️‍🌈

[ganjar gendang @clihstorice]

homophobia ini emang sering tumpang tindih sama classist, ableist, misoginis, patriarkis. lu bakalan sering ketemu omongan homophobes yang argumennya berlayer nyentuh isu-isu itu.

[Ashawo Sukuna @afrotaku___]

She was in the cement longer than he’s going to be in jail…

[Longswordwife @Longswordwife]

Christianity is so funny bc any religion that takes itself seriously would find it insulting to put the Word of God on a piece of cardboard meant to be covered in slop and thrown in the trash

[Setya Mickala @setyamickala]

Fun fact: 1 USD sekarang = Rp 18.000 = dapat sepiring nasi warteg + es teh

terus ada yang bilang

Politik gak ngaruh di hidup gw.

Justru karena lu cuek, makanya yang di atas santai aja ngatur hidup lo.
Lu gak ikut main bukan berarti lu gak di dalam permainan.

Lu cuma jadi bidaknya.

[Iman Zanatul Haeri @zanatul_91]

Selamat berjuang guru-guru Mexico. BTW kayaknya kita ada kesamaan ya. Sama-sama banyak kartel anggaran pendidikan. 🤭🤭🤭

[Fiersa Besari @FiersaBesari]

Pemerintah bisa bersikap seolah semuanya baik-baik saja, tetapi melemahnya nilai tukar rupiah tidak bisa berbohong. Ada yang salah dengan negeri ini, dan yang lebih menyedihkan, para pemimpinnya seakan tidak mau menerima kenyataan

[Benny Prawira Siauw @bennysiauw89]

18k, gaes, 18k

Masih pada mau ributin urusan selangkangan orang yang harmless kah?

[斉藤アルカ「Saito Arka」🧒🏻🌈 @Arkadesu]

Saya mengajak alumni dari kampus-kampus internasional yang memiliki standar DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) yang kuat untuk menyusun laporan mengenai praktik diskriminasi, ujaran kebencian, dan dehumanisasi yang ditujukan kepada komunitas queer di Indonesia 🏳️‍🌈.

Tujuannya bukan sekadar mendokumentasikan ketidakadilan yang terjadi, melainkan juga memastikan bahwa individu yang secara aktif mempromosikan intoleransi dan diskriminasi menghadapi konsekuensi reputasional yang relevan, termasuk dalam proses seleksi beasiswa, pertukaran akademik, maupun peluang pendidikan internasional yang menjunjung tinggi nilai kesetaraan dan hak asasi manusia.

[The First Darklord @DarklordAmdusc]

Tapi mereka seperti itu karena pelakunya homo pak. Kalau pelakunya hetero maka posternya tidak seperti ini. Harusnya tulisannya "kami menolak keras tindakan asusila di lingkungan kampus" bukan kek ginii

[c @girlwondrs]

had a thought yesterday of how ideal indonesia is ‘keberagaman’ but in reality the society wants more of ‘keseragaman’ because of how they only accept people who fits into the majority rather than embracing the diversity :-)

[dev🌿 @hist0riann]

guyss tolong bantu report postingan ini yaa
https://t.co/BBlAjxjZXY

[ferro★ @lypgloss]

hi why is this not viral?
event ini adalah ruang yang digunakan untuk "berdiskusi" dan untuk merencanakan UNJUK RASA UJARAN KEBENCIAN di universitas airlangga, YANG SEHARUSNYA MENJADI WADAH PENDIDIKAN TANPA DISKRIMINASI. make this go viral please!!!!!

[femiiiiii. @femiiiszn]

i believe in re-reading and re-watching your favourite books & movies at different stages of your life. the plot never changes, but your perspective does.

[yasmin | ⵢⴰⵙⵎⵉⵏ @reyskyhime]

very underrated lesbian fantasy books 🧵
1. the tiger's daughter by k. arsenault rivera
written as a letter after an empire falls into crisis, 2 girls are forced into political roles: one preparing to be empress, the other trains to fight demonic threats spreading across the land

[txt gajelas @txtdarigajelas]

duluan dollar 19rb jir daripada 19jt lapangan pekerjaan

[𝓟𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓪 🐸 @princesalamwane]

Women have spent their whole lives playing male characters without complaint. Give you one female protagonist and you cry like babies. So pathetic.

[Ali Alkhatib @_alialkhatib]

vaguely recall seeing some university spending significantly more on union-busting, policing, etc... than it would have cost to meet the demands of organizing graduate workers because the issue is never the money; it's the power. they'll happily take this deal; AI won't organize.

[allen @congaxtion]

probably unrelated tapi kadang gw lumayan sedih we need to get thru the horrors of recruitment process mahadahsyat yg menuntut perfect backgrounds but our literal gov with 10x our salary is mostly a bunch of incompetent people🚶🏼‍♀️

[Ryan Hart @thisdudelikesAI]

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts.

So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world.

What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.

Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations.

The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead.

Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described.

The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding.

The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months.
Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight.

Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now.

She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.