qué asco este mundo, qué asco con esta sociedad, qué asco con los hombres en general, son unos degenerados asquerosos repugnantes y ojalá se extinguieran
A federal appeals court ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual’s right to privately possess images or videos of child sexual abuse created using AI — if the material does not depict a real person and remains in the home.
The court relied on Supreme Court precedents Stanley v. Georgia (1969), which established protections for the private possession of obscene material in the home, and Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002), which ruled that certain virtual depictions involving no real children are protected by the First Amendment.
The defendant in the case, Steven Anderegg, was charged with producing and distributing obscene AI-generated images and sending them to a minor over Instagram. The possession charge was dismissed under the Supreme Court precedents.
The judge panel in the case has asked the Supreme Court to “reconsider legal precedents that predate advances in AI.”
(https://t.co/dB9uM8NG4c)
ya no quiero creer en sus señales porque le dije que si * * más adelante, se dejara cubrir por un momento... y BUENO ya estoy demente quizá pero será o no una señal
my love my darling my baby my sweetie my honey my other half my home my anchor my treasure my sunshine my moonbeam my starlight my dream my world my heaven my angel my why my one my only my forever my always my heart my soul
You will never convince me that animals don’t have a sense of humor. You can be having a goofy moment and then your pet senses the whimsy and starts acting silly. you’re both laughing in different languages