I founded and built TokenToolHub. We have never launched a token.
None of the $TOKENTOO contracts using our name came from me or anyone on our team.
Please do not buy them. The warning below contains every address we have confirmed.
PUBLIC WARNING
TokenToolHub has no official token.
Five Solana tokens created through https://t.co/oNpZeA21lh on September 25, 2026 are using our name and the $TOKENTOO ticker. They were created by different wallets with no affiliation to TokenToolHub.
These tokens were not deployed, issued, authorized, or endorsed by TokenToolHub Technologies Limited.
Unaffiliated CAs:
CjDMUWXXvQr8iqdAF2W9D18PU1hSM1CkTrP73A8QNJwW
9UBFNrUPkAVxzriEphSLqwmNbHiBXXFCbyCG7psnFXci
6XMqUW3SX9EKxfWo6jeyPNTzcR2twD9X7vLnuDuFERbf
2qik47cczG9o7BCh8Q6Ty4nnjmwTNnqzQHCbdt7wuhKL
CrkBqW2B2iNdh8xk5o7ziUGxxM1eujoAKRbUWCDUb9ao
Token metadata can display any website, description, or X handle. Linking to https://t.co/GCtwxEL9Ms or @TokenToolHub does not make a token ours.
Do not buy these tokens or connect your wallet through any page promoting them as official.
Official information comes only from @TokenToolHub and https://t.co/WMYr5MzOgc
The authority setup is not the biggest issue here.
Mint + freeze are disabled, but one resolved owner controls 61.27% of supply and the top 10 control 95.84%.
There is also no indexed liquidity pool.
CA: 2aVkhRfAEm44tMhFo8oamWvumGGvweFqnUwukRMBkray
A Solana token scan just returned a major holder-concentration warning.
TokenToolHub score: 64/100
Current evidence:
• Mint authority disabled
• Freeze authority disabled
• Standard SPL Token
• No material transfer-control extension detected
• No transfer-fee extension detected
• Largest resolved owner: 61.27%
• Top 10 resolved owners: 95.84%
• No indexed liquidity pool found
• 0% liquidity lock coverage reported
The main concern is supply concentration.
One resolved owner controls more than 61% of supply, while the top 10 control almost 96%.
That creates substantial dependence on a very small group of wallets and can materially affect liquidity and price behavior.
TokenToolHub also found no indexed executable market. That does not prove the token is untradeable, but an actual buy and sell route should be confirmed before assuming market access.
CA: 2aVkhRfAEm44tMhFo8oamWvumGGvweFqnUwukRMBkray
Full scan:
https://t.co/ikpCB0EfJE
We scanned $ASTA on Solana.
CA: 3YRy7BNM31zGtxz3J5TZBdH3Qfu1DV2fpiUEs43upump
This one needs much closer attention:
• TokenToolHub score: 52/100
• Token-2022
• Mint authority: disabled
• Freeze authority: disabled
• No material transfer-control extension detected
• No transfer-fee extension detected
• Top owner: 92.46%
• Top 10 holders: 98.32%
• 24h volume: ~$14.78K
• Reported liquidity lock coverage: 100%
The biggest issue is concentration.
One resolved owner controls 92.46% of supply. TokenToolHub classifies that as a Critical finding because a single owner may dominate liquidity and price behavior.
That address needs to be identified. It could be a pool, treasury, vesting account or externally controlled wallet. The concentration figure alone does not establish which.
Liquidity is another major gap.
No indexed pool was resolved in the scan, and executable buy and sell routes were not returned. Practical sellability and sell impact therefore remain unresolved.
The reported 100% liquidity lock figure should not be treated as proof of a practical exit when indexed liquidity and executable routes remain unresolved.
Full scan:
https://t.co/W8LK2wTu0S
We scanned $SIGH on BNB Smart Chain.
CA: 0x6B5b4Cc9F07d10Cc48e75D234cFE04a0931B7777
The verified implementation shows a limited control surface:
• TokenToolHub score: 79/100
• Source verified
• Owner: renounced
• No mint-like capability detected
• No wallet restrictions detected
• No mutable fees or taxes detected
• No trading switch detected
• No transaction or wallet limits detected
• No emergency pause detected
• No asset recovery or withdrawal detected
• No generic external execution detected
• Upgrade authority: PRESENT
The important part is the proxy.
Implementation:
0x024f18294970b5c76c0691b87f138a0317156422
The live owner() returns the zero address, but that does not make the contract immutable.
TokenToolHub detected an upgrade path, while the proxy administrator remains unresolved. The implementation being analyzed may therefore potentially be replaced through separate proxy authority.
Trading simulation was also unavailable, leaving honeypot status, buy tax, sell tax and the practical sell path unresolved.
Renounced ownership is useful evidence, but with an upgradeable contract, the proxy authority matters just as much.
Full scan:
https://t.co/LCOE0WnC5r
Scanned $SIGH on BSC.
Score: 79/100
Source verified.
Owner renounced.
No mint, wallet restrictions, mutable fees, trading switch or limits detected.
Main watch: upgrade authority is present and proxy admin is unresolved
https://t.co/b1PwbwrpPF
$TED is one I’d treat carefully.
The largest resolved owner controls 65.91% of supply, the top 10 hold 89.39%, and indexed liquidity is only ~$4.68K.
That concentration is the real issue here.
CA: jSC3hfcrTcxQzRQ3DhbhQvjB86z8ubFY5N6BsGw38pu
$TED is showing a high-risk Solana market structure despite disabled mint and freeze authorities.
TokenToolHub score: 44/100
Current evidence:
• Mint authority disabled
• Freeze authority disabled
• No material transfer-control extension detected
• No transfer-fee extension detected
• Largest resolved owner: 65.91%
• Top 10 resolved owners: 89.39%
• Best indexed liquidity: ~$4.68K
• 24h volume: ~$15.52K
• 0% liquidity lock coverage reported
The biggest concern is concentration.
One resolved owner controls nearly two-thirds of supply, while the top 10 control almost 90%. That creates significant dependence on a very small number of wallets.
Liquidity is also extremely thin at roughly $4.68K, which can make relatively small trades produce severe slippage or difficult exits.
Executable buy and sell route testing is unavailable, and the metadata update authority remains unresolved.
CA: jSC3hfcrTcxQzRQ3DhbhQvjB86z8ubFY5N6BsGw38pu
Full scan:
https://t.co/aoXiLLvS1Q
$TED: 44/100 on TokenToolHub.
Top owner: 65.91%.
Top 10: 89.39%.
Liquidity: ~$4.68K.
0% reported locked.
Very concentrated and thin.
CA: jSC3hfcrTcxQzRQ3DhbhQvjB86z8ubFY5N6BsGw38pu
https://t.co/WEhO1qnerH
$SWORDCAT has a strong authority profile here.
Mint + freeze authority are disabled, and the largest resolved owner holds just 4.04%.
I’d mainly watch the $3.55M 24h volume against ~$181.5K liquidity.
CA: 5tCju6YNxHq5zrA6tGndr6F7TK42mpUFmeE31cSFpump
$SWORDCAT is showing a strong Solana control profile, with market activity still worth examining closely.
TokenToolHub score: 92/100
Current evidence:
• Mint authority disabled
• Freeze authority disabled
• No material transfer-control extension detected
• No transfer-fee extension detected
• Largest resolved owner: 4.04%
• Top 10 resolved owners: 21.59%
• Best indexed liquidity: ~$181.5K
• 24h volume: ~$3.55M
• 49.93% liquidity lock coverage reported
The authority side looks clean in the available evidence, and holder concentration is relatively distributed.
The main watchpoint is market activity.
Around $3.55M in 24h volume is moving against roughly $181.5K of indexed liquidity. TokenToolHub flags that relationship as unusually high, so wallet flows and trade distribution deserve review before volume is treated as a standalone strength.
Executable buy and sell route testing is currently unavailable, and the metadata update authority remains unresolved.
CA: 5tCju6YNxHq5zrA6tGndr6F7TK42mpUFmeE31cSFpump
Full scan:
https://t.co/8xSn30pLb1
$SWORDCAT: 92/100 on TokenToolHub.
Mint + freeze authority disabled. Top owner: 4.04%. Liquidity: ~$181.5K.
Main watchpoint: ~$3.55M 24h volume relative to liquidity.
CA: 5tCju6YNxHq5zrA6tGndr6F7TK42mpUFmeE31cSFpump
https://t.co/odfXvabMCS
$CREPE has a cleaner simulation profile than many of today’s scans.
No honeypot detected, 0% buy and sell tax, and no mint or upgrade path detected.
I’d still review the trading-control and wallet-exemption functions.
CA: 0xeb2B7d5691878627eff20492cA7c9a71228d931D
$CREPE is showing a relatively strong BNB Chain contract profile, but there are still privileged controls worth understanding.
TokenToolHub intelligence score: 88/100
Current evidence:
• Source verified
• No honeypot detected
• Buy tax: 0%
• Sell tax: 0%
• No mint-like supply expansion detected
• No mutable fee or tax controls detected
• No transaction or wallet limit controls detected
• No proxy or upgrade path detected
• Ownership currently reads as renounced
The main caution is the trading control surface.
The verified code exposes:
• setAutomatedMarketMakerPair(address,bool)
• setExcludeFromFees(address,bool)
• claimStuckTokens(address)
This means market-pair treatment can potentially be changed, selected wallets may receive different fee or trading treatment, and assets held by the contract can be recovered.
So while the simulation currently looks clean, these control paths still deserve review.
CA: 0xeb2B7d5691878627eff20492cA7c9a71228d931D
Full scan:
https://t.co/i4yd7g4hlf
$CREPE: 88/100 on TokenToolHub.
No honeypot detected.
0% buy tax.
0% sell tax.
No mint or upgrade path detected.
Main watchpoint: trading-control and wallet-exemption functions remain in the verified code.
CA: 0xeb2B7d5691878627eff20492cA7c9a71228d931D
https://t.co/hKvJbytO7L
$CATIUS has a solid authority and holder-distribution profile.
Mint + freeze authority are disabled, and the top 10 resolved owners hold just 9.06%.
I’d mainly watch liquidity vs volume.
CA: 9S2uxYgTDM1eM1Ryyc7D4dVKEFrb2F9m8NAygyQspump
$CATIUS is showing a relatively strong Solana control profile, with market structure still worth monitoring.
TokenToolHub score: 84/100
Current evidence:
• Mint authority disabled
• Freeze authority disabled
• No material transfer-control extension detected
• No transfer-fee extension detected
• Largest resolved owner: 6.94%
• Top 10 resolved owners: 9.06%
• Best indexed liquidity: ~$60.7K
• 24h volume: ~$680K
• 100% liquidity lock coverage reported
The authority and holder-distribution picture is relatively clean.
The main watchpoint is market activity. Roughly $680K in 24h volume is moving against only about $60.7K of indexed liquidity, so wallet flows and trade distribution should be reviewed rather than treating volume alone as a strength.
Liquidity also depends heavily on one indexed pool.
Executable buy and sell route testing remains unavailable, and the metadata update authority could not be confirmed.
CA: 9S2uxYgTDM1eM1Ryyc7D4dVKEFrb2F9m8NAygyQspump
Full scan:
https://t.co/rPyeudQ6WX
$CLAUDIA has a strong authority profile.
Mint + freeze authority are disabled and the top resolved owner holds 6.83%.
The part I’d watch is $6.86M 24h volume against roughly $123K liquidity.
CA: H7TuvDxEKygh27zGfGcjKG8JGWgrbyKpPtvJEpGosfas
$CLAUDIA is showing one of the stronger Solana control profiles from today’s scans.
TokenToolHub score: 92/100
Current evidence:
• Mint authority disabled
• Freeze authority disabled
• No material transfer-control extension detected
• No transfer-fee extension detected
• Largest resolved owner: 6.83%
• Top 10 resolved owners: 25.01%
• Best indexed liquidity: ~$123.4K
• 24h volume: ~$6.86M
• 53.37% liquidity lock coverage reported
The authority profile is strong, but the market activity deserves closer inspection.
Around $6.86M in 24h volume against roughly $123.4K of indexed liquidity is unusually high. That can indicate aggressive turnover, volatility or concentrated activity, so wallet flows and trade distribution should be checked before relying on volume alone.
Executable buy and sell route testing is currently unavailable, and the metadata update authority remains unresolved.
CA: H7TuvDxEKygh27zGfGcjKG8JGWgrbyKpPtvJEpGosfas
Full scan:
https://t.co/Pu0eZiDQZo
The proxy is the part I would focus on with $ZERO.
No mint or mutable-fee path was detected in the verified code, but upgrade authority is present and the proxy administrator remains unresolved.
CA: 0x90269EDBf32583A47Fa283835B5D35d5d83d7777
$ZERO on BNB Chain is showing a mixed contract profile.
TokenToolHub score: 79/100
Current verified-code evidence:
• Source verified
• No mint-like supply expansion detected
• No mutable fee or tax controls detected
• No trading switch detected
• No wallet restriction capability detected
• No transaction or wallet limit controls detected
• Ownership currently reads as renounced
The main risk is the proxy structure.
Upgrade authority is present, meaning the contract logic being analyzed today may potentially be replaced.
Current implementation:
0x024f18294970b5c76c0691b87f138a0317156422
The proxy administrator remains unresolved.
Honeypot simulation, buy tax and sell tax are also unresolved, so those checks should not be treated as confirmed clean.
CA: 0x90269EDBf32583A47Fa283835B5D35d5d83d7777
Full scan:
https://t.co/8znkuz60zq
$ZERO: 79/100 on TokenToolHub.
No mint, mutable fee, trading switch or wallet restriction path detected in verified code.
Main concern: upgrade authority is present.
CA: 0x90269EDBf32583A47Fa283835B5D35d5d83d7777
https://t.co/SyAOXdzNbn
$WHIPCAT has a solid authority setup, but I’d watch concentration and liquidity.
Mint + freeze authority are disabled, while the top resolved owner holds 15.58%.
CA: F4635H9HFAzYjpyM3coGMtW8pMmEYRtwrgz5mgfHpump
$WHIPCAT is showing a relatively strong Solana control profile, but holder concentration and liquidity deserve attention.
TokenToolHub score: 84/100
Current evidence:
• Mint authority disabled
• Freeze authority disabled
• No material transfer-control extension detected
• No transfer-fee extension detected
• Largest resolved owner: 15.58%
• Top 10 resolved owners: 29.73%
• Best indexed liquidity: ~$26.3K
• 24h volume: ~$139.5K
• 100% liquidity lock coverage reported
The authority side looks considerably cleaner than the market structure.
The largest resolved owner controls about 15.58% of supply, while the best indexed pool carries only around $26.3K liquidity.
TokenToolHub also flagged unusually high volume relative to liquidity, so wallet flows and trade distribution are worth checking before treating volume alone as a strength.
Executable buy and sell route testing is currently unavailable, and the metadata update authority remains unresolved.
CA: F4635H9HFAzYjpyM3coGMtW8pMmEYRtwrgz5mgfHpump
Full scan:
https://t.co/Bu2eZs1Iyv