I prefer the obvious dangers of freedom over the insideous creeping threat of collectivists seeking utopia. It's always one right away, one more genocide out of reach.
There are generations of women who desperately need these lies to be true…
Because if they aren’t, the reality they must face will be too much for them to bear.
Those whose lives most depend on the lie will always be the greatest enemy of truth.
The Russian Bolsheviks attempted to wipe an entire breed of dog (the Borzoi) out of existence because it was associated with the Russian aristocracy
During America’s cultural revolution, Washington Lee University tried to erase the grave of Traveller, Robert E Lee’s Horse, by breaking up his old tombstone and carting it away when no one was watching. Eventually, they put up a less ornate tombstone that has no context.
The bullshit are so spiteful in such mutants that they would wipe away even animals that aren’t in line with their ideology
They can be defeated, or they will try to wipe us away as they tried to wipe the borzoi and Traveller away
There is no middle ground
There is no opportunity for compromise
The only reason we signed the Outer Space Treaty was to prevent a Moon War with the Soviets before we figured out fully reusable heavy lift. Now we have Starship and the Soviets are gone.
Vae victis. Moonifest destiny.
*beeeeeep*
This is INSANE.
LEGAL immigration is a major problem. These companies, especially big tech, are abusing these immigration programs to replace American workers with foreign workers.
No more. It’s long past time to end the H-1B scam.
In real life, thousands upon thousands of Christian Churches around the world feed people in need every single day.
Online atheists only talk about the hungry just to mock religion, and feed fucking nobody.
“yOu CaNT gIvE a PErfEct tEXtBoOk dEfiNItIon, sO hOw Do YoU kNoW It’S bAD?!”
Ya dipshit, 99% of people couldn’t explain how cancer works either. Doesn’t mean they’re wrong for thinking it’s bad.
They see it killing people, so they identify it as bad. End of story.
Same thing with socialism. People look at history and see that every socialist society has failed miserably, so they conclude it doesn’t work.
And before you morons jump in the comments screaming “Scandinavia!”those aren’t socialist countries. They’re capitalist countries with large welfare programs. The workers don’t own the means of production. That’s not socialism. It’s capitalism with a generous safety net.
Most of you pro-socialist dipshits can’t give a real definition either, outside of “socialism is the good one with free stuff.”
Good, we should make it impossible to exist in the US as an illegal
School, work, even a basic trip to the store should carry the constant fear of deportaitons
Illegals should be afraid to be in the US because they're criminals
The claim on this can is true.
A single nuclear fuel pellet the size of a gummy bear produces the same amount of energy as one ton of coal. The amount of nuclear fuel it would take to meet all of your energy needs for your entire life could fit in a soda can.
All of the waste from your usage would also fit inside a soda can.
If you had one can for every person in the United States today and stacked them into a cube, that cube would be 164 feet tall and 164 feet wide, or about half the length of a football field.
Yes, if 100% of our electricity was generated by nuclear power, the total lifetime nuclear fuel and waste produced by every single person in the United States right now would fit in a single football field.
Actually, since spent nuclear fuel is recyclable, the amount of waste would be a lot less than that. If we recycled all of it, we would have a shot glass worth of waste per person's entire lifetime.
Our current Civil War:
I must point out that in 2016 a President was elected who was immediately rejected by a certain portion of the population and by state and local governments. They brought criminal legal action against Trump and impeached him before he'd even had a chance to do anything, and accused him of being a dictator and the death of democracy — though it was they who rejected a lawful election and threw the Constitution out the window. Sanctuary laws in defiance of federal authority are in every case the equivalent of besieging and firing on Ft. Sumter.
When Trump won reelection in 2024, the rebels doubled down on their secession from the Union by passing laws against federal officers enforcing federal law within their sanctuary purview, all the time claiming that Trump was oppressing THEM by taking completely proper actions. So by rejecting the results of the election, they are in open rebellion.
And if you say “Trump is no Lincoln” you'd be right. Trump has not arrested and charged with treason the deniers and rejectors of federal authority, including mayors and governors who threaten to prosecute federal officers for enforcing the law. Trump has been far more restrained than Lincoln ever was — though the defiance of the Constitution is no less egregious. Sanctuary laws are exactly the same as secession — a declaration that the federal government has no authority here. They have declared war against the President and openly abused him as has not been done to a President since Lincoln. But the President has not sent federal troops to arrest those publicly guilty of sedition and treason, and take over the defiant government bodies and throw them in jail. They claim to fear Trump's officers — while they are the ones who suppress free speech and try to adjust campaign laws so as to prevent the candidates they oppose from being on the ballot. California doesn't even pretend to be a democracy anymore … but Trump stays his hand.
So, true — he is no Lincoln. He has been infinitely lenient in dealing with people and governments that are in open rebellion against the federal government because the wrong guy made it into the White House.
"I am a proud anchor baby," says the daughter of an illegal alien who now has power to write the laws of the United States.
Thank you for proving why birthright citizenship was a mistake.