@DelusionPosting Whites shouldn't say it unless they're prepared to defend themselves or die.
The world might become a better place for whites if white men were suddenly more violent.
@ClavrFalls@JoelWebbon The racial gate is only a problem if you're not white and want in.
Resources are finite.
If the colony allocates them to an outsider instead of one of their own, they wrong one of their own.
Therefore, you are essentially saying that white people should wrong their own.
@ClavrFalls@JoelWebbon 'A white-only colony is already doing wrong'
Who are they wronging? In order to do wrong there must be a victim. Yet there is no one on the planet except whites.
@JoelWebbon Racism is an economic strategy for exploiting the resources and power of a competing racial group. It only works if the group is susceptible to such manipulation, and white people are. Appeals to their sense virtue and moral supremacy have been effective.
@ClavrFalls@JoelWebbon A 100% white colony on Mars, becomes utopia, announces 'white-only'.
You would call them 'a bad thing', evil, immoral, etc., when they had done no wrong to anyone.
Actually, you wouldn't bother, if you perceived there was nothing to gain from it.
@ClavrFalls@JoelWebbon 'Racism isn't "a group succeeds somewhere."'
Yes it is. It's part of it.
If whites only lived in a poor insignificant homogenous country that feared outsiders you wouldn't even bother calling them racist. Because there would be no benefit for you, no incentive, no resource.
@ClavrFalls@JoelWebbon It exposes the problem, except it's not a white problem.
And yes, they were 'white resources' that whites generously decided to give away. If you control something entirely, it's yours. Call it whatever.
Your resources, a family's resources, a company's resources, a people's.
@ClavrFalls@JoelWebbon You could call the failed colony racist, but no one would care since there was no resource to be had. It's only when there's something to be gained, with whites being the gatekeeper, that racism becomes the strategy to get it.
@ClavrFalls@JoelWebbon The violations of 'in-group preference' you describe involve whites giving something they have the right to give, to someone they would prefer not giving it to.
IOW, racism is when whites refuse to dispossess themselves of their resources and give them to another group.