Another update Grok Limits.
Because it started on Saturday is 1 day is 25 %
So total will be more then 100% in a week.
Premium + with SuperGrok is to expensive.
We need more credits
Jesus. Using #Grok used to be fun. I get only 20 attempts and not only does it not do what I want, it will occasionally fail to do anything at all. Why the hell would anyone pay for that?
now we know where the Fable 5 compute is coming from 🙄
supergrok users got absolutely hosed by these changes, i legit think they cut usage to 1/7th of previous levels
esto me parece una ofensa y un robo.
si ya de por si los limites diarios eran absurdos, esto es otro nivel…
15% de uso en menos de 12 horas con 3 videos y 1 Imagen y 5 minutos en Grok Companions.
@elonmusk#Grok#SuperGrok#GrokImagine
Okay, this is bullshit. I gave xAI a hundred bucks and suddenly like a month later this new weekly usage system is brought in and I can't do a thing for five days now. Fuck off @elonmusk, give me my money back, I'm not into this bait-n-switch garbage.
#Grok
The problem is not the pool.
xAI’s new Grok limit system could have been a great idea.
A weekly shared pool across Chat, Build, Imagine, Voice, etc. actually makes sense. A developer may want most of their usage in Build. A creator may want Imagine. A researcher may want Chat/DeepSearch.
Flexibility is good.
The problem is not the pool.
The problem is that the pool seems to have arrived with much worse effective limits, less transparency, and more pressure to top up or upgrade.
Before this, SuperGrok felt generous. I almost never hit Grok chat limits. Build felt usable. Imagine felt usable. Each product had its own room to breathe.
Now one heavy workflow can eat the same shared allowance and hurt the others.
If I spend my week coding, I should not lose normal chat usage.
If I spend my week generating images, I should not lose my ability to ask Grok questions.
If a generation fails or is blocked, users should not feel like they paid quota for nothing.
The right version of this system would be hybrid:
Keep guaranteed reserved limits per product.
Add a flexible weekly pool on top.
Show real numbers, not only a percentage bar.
Do not silently reduce what paying users could already do.
Make top-ups optional, not the obvious destination of the redesign.
For example: give every SuperGrok user a reserved baseline for Chat, Build, and Imagine, then let the weekly pool handle overflow or personal preference.
That would make the product better.
What happened feels like the opposite: a good product idea used to justify a worse subscription experience.
And this matters more because SuperGrok is $30/month. That is more than ChatGPT Plus, Claude Pro, and Google AI Pro. If xAI wants to charge more than the standard $20 AI subscription tier, it should give more value, not more anxiety around usage.
I don’t mind a fair limit system. Compute is expensive. Video and coding agents are not free.
But paying users should be able to keep the workflows they already had.
A new limit system should make usage more flexible, not make the product feel smaller.
@xAI@X@XDevelopers please fix the usage limits.
We love Grok, but we don’t love feeling robbed by a subscription that suddenly gives us less.
I reached this limit after 2 days once my monthly limit started over July 1st, I asked Grok to review my Project and provide an overview so we could continue.
These weekly limits are unfair. I pay $30 a month and I used 90% of my weekly allowance in one day. Not buying Super Grok again. I think it's extremely bad faith that you've added restrictions to existing users who paid for a different service
@elonmusk@xai@grok