cesar

[sil @snoozzgi]

bandera d méxico legado d nuestros héroes símbolo d la unidad d nuestros padres y nuestros hermanos t prometemos ser siempre fieles a los principios d libertad y d justicia q hacen d nuestra patria una nación independiente humana y generosa a la q entregamos nuestra existencia

[Otro Culé Mexicano @OtroCuleMexa]

La primera ya está en Los Pinos enterrada con el Luis Miguel original

[RealSeasonNT @RealSeasonNT1]

El reglamento se ajusta en cada acción en función de como se puede joder a Vinicius Jr
No es algo nuevo, lleva pasando años esto
Y no solo dentro del terreno de juego, también fuera

[MT2 @madrid_total2]

MÉXICO HACE POR PRIMERA VEZ EN LA HISTORIA 9PTS EN GRUPO DEL MUNDIAL.

MÉXICO RECIBIÓ 0 GOLES Y MARCÓ 6 GOLES EN LOS GRUPOS.

SE VIENE LA PRIMERA 🇲🇽🇲🇽🇲🇽🇲🇽🇲🇽🇲🇽🇲🇽

[WEST @westsidebuzzin]

I really pulled 3 mentally ill hoes in a ROW 🫥 #maybeitsme

[Kimi Regal @RegalKimi]

After Ronaldo won EURO 2016 while Messi was still without a senior international trophy, a common argument across football media, punditry and mainstream football discourse was that international trophies were not essential to determining individual greatness. Football was said to be a team sport, and a player’s legacy should not be reduced to what he won with his national team.

At the time, Messi had lost four major international finals with Argentina and had even retired from international football after the 2016 Copa América final defeat to Chile.

A few months later, Messi returned. What followed was an unusually busy Copa América schedule. The tournament was played in 2015, 2016, 2019 and 2021, four editions in just six years. Many observers could not help but notice that a player who had repeatedly fallen short was being given more opportunities to win in a short period and rightly so. Eventually, Messi won the 2021 Copa América.

For years, the football world had been told that international trophies were not necessary to be considered the greatest of all time. When Messi lacked an international trophy, the importance of international success was routinely downplayed.

Similarly, when Messi lacked a World Cup, it was not considered essential to being the GOAT. Once he won it in Qatar, however, the World Cup was elevated from being one achievement among many to the achievement that supposedly settled the GOAT debate forever.

To many Ronaldo supporters, this is the clearest example of shifting goalposts in football history. The standards appeared to change at every stage until they aligned perfectly with Messi’s résumé. What was once irrelevant became important. What was important became essential. And once Messi achieved it, the debate was declared over.

In Qatar, Argentina received five penalties during the tournament, a World Cup record for a single team in one edition. Several refereeing decisions involving Argentina remain debated to this day, including Messi’s handball incident against the Netherlands that some believe warranted a second yellow card.

For many critics, these were not isolated incidents but part of a wider pattern they believe has followed Messi throughout his career, where controversial decisions repeatedly seem to fall in his favour. They point to numerous moments over the years where they believe punishments that would have been applied to other players were overlooked when Messi was involved. Some supporters have even argued that similar concerns resurfaced only recently, after another incident in which they believe Messi was fortunate to avoid a red card.

Whether one agrees with that view or not, it has become a significant reason why many Ronaldo supporters remain sceptical of the narrative surrounding Messi’s achievements and the way they are discussed by the football establishment and mainstream media.

For many Ronaldo supporters, the issue has never simply been about preferring one player over another. It is about what they perceive as inconsistent standards. They see achievements weighed differently depending on who accomplished them. They see one player protected from scrutiny while the other is subjected to it at every turn.

That is why many continue to side with Ronaldo. Not because to many he is the greatest to ever kick a ball or he has won every trophy or because he is beyond criticism, but because they believe the standards applied to him have often been harsher than those applied to his greatest rival.

They would rather support a player who loses with his honour intact than celebrate victories they believe are surrounded by unanswered questions.

As José Mourinho once said: “If I have to win in that way, I would be ashamed.”

For them, the issue is not simply who won. It is whether the criteria for greatness remained consistent throughout the debate. In their view, they did not.

[cesar @cesarf359]

@PolymarketFC @PlayersTribune @RealSeasonNT1 hay que traer al chaval, viene con 21n de idolo y su locura de trabajo. puede hacer gran pareja con endricky

[Jǔrgen Flöpp©️🇲🇽 @JurgensF_MX]

Yo al rato en la sala de mis casa

[Santiago Gimenez @Santgimenez_]

¿y si si? 👀❤️‍🔥🇲🇽

[❄️ @footyhan]

I apologize in advance if this applies to you but I sincerely believe that if you think Pedri was ever close to Jude, you are of an objectively lower mental status than me, something akin to a sea urchin or maybe a mussel.

[Mr. Durán @MrDuran_]

Lo bueno es que cuando ahora Mourinho diga que hay aficionados disfrazados, sabremos el porcentaje exacto.

[RealSeasonNT @RealSeasonNT1]

No es un Rediseño Lagarto, tú rediseñas algo buscando una estrategia. Y aquí no hay estrategia.

Es simplemente el Presidente preguntando a sus socios si están felices y de acuerdo con estos 25 años y lo que tiene pensado para el Madrid de los próximos 30 años incluso cuando él ya no esté.

Y simplemente quiere saber si están con él. Si no están, pues fue bonito mientras duró y Bye.

Tampoco está el Presidente para perder el tiempo si su masa social no está con él como están vendiendo 24/7 desde todos los frentes de Ruido desde hace 1 año.

Es bastante humano el preguntarlo y eso son estas elecciones. Ahora como arrase que se preparen los del Ruido que no habrá piedad está vez 😁

[COOP @1LD77]

لوكا حقق+50 فوز اربع مرات بمسيرته مع فرق المفروض ما تفوز+50

لوكا وصل نهائي المنطقة مرتين-نفس يوكيتش و شاي- مع فرق اضعف، لوكا فاز على اربع فرق تملك +50 انتصار، لوكا ثاني اكثر PG عنده ال نبا فرست تيم- من بعد اتحاد الـ NBA

ما راح يعرفون صعوبة الأشياء اللي حققها لوكا إلا إذا اعتزل

[TierZoo @TierZoo]

One of the tragic things about Revenge of the Sith is that they cut out half of the entire reason Anakin turned to the dark side.

He turns on the jedi because he wants to save Padme, but in that moment he is still doing what he believes is necessary to save his wife from certain death.

What actually seals his fate and *causes him to turn away from everyone, even those he loves* is seeing Obi-wan arrive on the ship with Padme, because to him, it confirms that they are having an affair.

But why? Is that really all it took to get him to doubt his wife loves him? Showing up on a ship together?

No, the reason he calls her a liar and shouts "YOU'RE WITH HIM!" before nearly killing her is that there's an entire subplot of the film that was cut.

In this subplot, Padme is secretly setting up the beginnings of the rebel alliance. She has figured out that Palpatine is an evil dictator and wants to remove him from office. She doesn't tell Anakin about this, aside from vaguely hinting at it when she says "have you ever considered that we may be on the wrong side".

Palpatine figures out what Padme is up to, but instead of directly cracking down on the rebels, he uses the fact that Padme is keeping a secret from Anakin to drive a wedge between them. Anakin knows *something* is up with her, but not exactly what. Palpatine exploits this by implying on multiple occasions that Padme is having an affair with Obi-wan. He tells Anakin that this is why he was kept off of the council.

From Anakin's POV, Obi-wan is keeping him down, stealing his girl, preventing his ascent to Master (and from accessing secret info that only masters are allowed to read), and even stealing his valor by taking on General Grievous alone despite being the less powerful jedi. And the Jedi Order is enabling him to do so.

So, when Obi-wan shows up on Mustafar with Padme, Anakin "realizes" that he has betrayed and killed children to protect someone who didn't even love him. He's lost everything and been played a fool.

Palpatine seemed to be the only person in the universe who wasn't lying to him and trying to keep him down. Or so he thought.

[⭐️ @starpplus]

De cabrones escuchar Omakase y no escribirle

[Sammy @SammyYusuf416]

@LexDiamonds__ It’s literally LeBron theory. When your star player is too good too fast and they are healthy consistently your team’s floor will be high. The thunder after 2020 missed the playoffs 3 straight years and were the worst team in the sport for two of those years, but it helped.

[RealSeasonNT @RealSeasonNT1]

Los socios con su participación seguirán eligiendo a los gestores que deseen votando.
Una formula muchísimo más coherente para una Institución que genera en breve 2.000M de euros

Si es aceptado en Referendum (los socios mandan como debe ser)
Se crea un Órgano Supremo: La Junta General de Socios

La Asamblea de Socios Compromisarios desaparece y se sustituye por una Junta General. Como cada socio tiene una participación, cada socio tiene un voto (el inversor tiene el 5% de los votos totales).

Los estatutos de la nueva empresa estipularán que cada X años se debe renovar el órgano de administración (el Consejo de Administración).

Se presentan listas cerradas de candidaturas (un Presidente y sus consejeros). Se puede mantener la exigencia de avales para evitar candidaturas Populistas y externas

Los 100.000 socios votarían normalmente. Si una candidatura obtiene, por ejemplo, el 60% de los votos de los socios, ese 60% se calcula sobre el 95% del capital total de la empresa.
¿Qué pasa con el inversor (5%)? El inversor votará en la Junta General con el peso de su 5%. Aunque vote a una candidatura concreta, nunca tendrá fuerza suficiente para imponer a un gestor por sí solo, pero sí puede ser el "árbitro" o el factor de desempate en unas elecciones muy reñidas entre dos candidatos de los socios.
El inversor que entre será un Salvaguardian de malas gestiones. Un cortafuegos, un vigilante 24/7
Y el socio ahora sí sabrá a quién votar pq tendrá un Patrimonio de valor que cuidar.
Ahora esto no ocurre y algunos solo hacen negocio con su abono, el Madrid les importa poco.

La estructura de gobernanza de un Consejo de Administración es sencilla
Para que la empresa funcione, el poder se delega en un Consejo de Administración. Lo normal en este tipo de pactos de socios es:
Grandes Mayorías Protegidas: Para decisiones críticas (vender el Bernabéu, cambiar los colores, mudar el equipo de ciudad), los estatutos exigirán un 96% de los votos. Esto le da al inversor (5%) un "derecho de veto" para proteger su inversión frente a locuras de la masa social, y a los socios un blindaje total frente al inversor.

Es muy común que, por contratos de transmisión, ese 5% dé derecho al fondo a tener un asiento de oyente o un consejero en el Consejo de Administración para supervisar las cuentas, mientras que los socios (el 95%) eligen al Presidente y al resto del Consejo.

En definitiva, se crearía una empresa comercialmente muy atractiva para la inversión externa, pero cuyo control político seguiría funcionando de manera idéntica a una democracia asamblearia.

El gran sueño de Bernabéu lo haría posible Tito con la aprobación de sus Socios. Por fin el Real Madrid siendo de sus socios de forma real y con valor
Pero sobre todo nos prepara para el Real Madrid de los próximos 50 años

[RealSeasonNT @RealSeasonNT1]

Que gran apunte Alex
Los has leído a la perfección 😁