I hope instead hyperliquid continues ignoring the US completely, causing the US to massively fall even further behind the rest of the world. This political/financial mafia needs to be reminded they are meaningless nobodys; the world doesnt need them and would hella benefit from being rid of them.
@KyleSamani Hyperliquid has no legal predicament. "Legal" has a hyperliquid predicament. Maybe once you understand this you will see that the US is the problem here, not technology.
And it isnt obvious that the US legal/political system is the sole cause and originator of any and all mentioned issues? Hyperliquid is not the problem. The US and the "Clarity" Act abomination are. The only ones who need to do anything are US folk, to prevent this attempted hostile takeover of an industry these politicians and bankers are desperately throwing hail marys at to try to retain some semblance of relevance, when the reality is that that relevance has long since gone, and the world and technology will keep on ticking perfectly well without them, as it has for nearly two decades.
> be @Hyper_Strategy
> rug bonds contract stealing user funds
> ignore DMs to return stolen funds
> ban from tg when asked to review DMs
All hyperevm folk STEER CLEAR of this “project”, they have already stolen user funds and will likely do so again.
I don’t think many realized what has happened here.
@Kinetiq_xyz has become the #3 global LST with:
- zero paid liquidity and TVL
- zero support, subsidies or preference from the Hyperliquid foundation
- the only governance token (in all the categories we operate in) that explicitly and programmatically accrues value from its entire product suite
- raised mere fractions of what every other participant in our categories has (<$2m), returning exponentially better results
- airdropped the largest % of every other participant in our categories (25%)
Crypto is really not used to this, and what better than to have done it all in the most Darwinian, and pure ecosystem in crypto; Hyperliquid.
There simply isn’t enough kinetiq:native in existence.
Just to continue with how this usually goes, sometimes they will refund, sometimes they will keep repeating illegal bullshit that you must return for a refund. If this is the case, save all communication and file a dispute with the card you used to pay for it. By FTC regs, a merchant must ship an item in a way that the customer receives it in the expected condition. Since this is not the case, and you offered for them to take the item back and they refused, you have exhausted all buyer requirements and have full grounds to dispute.
This is a much better way to ship than the OP, only thing exposed to impact damage is the 4 corners. For OP all 6 sides of the box and all corners are fully exposed to all shipping box impact. Despicable and negligent, I always refuse items shipped with zero protection. that means I reject a shit load of shipments, but I also refuse to let companies get away with this bullshit. Shipping like this deserves a full refund without return.