![GFS_backup's tweet photo. [NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Made… Court acknowledges ‘unpaid settlement money’
“With this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Court’s 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that “the effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.” It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the members’ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agency’s failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agency’s failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that “it is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.”
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that “the attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.”
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, “The court has decided to fully accept the creditors’ claims,” adding, “The unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.”"
🔗https://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKGX9EzbsAA8MMT.jpg)
![GFS_backup's tweet photo. [NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Made… Court acknowledges ‘unpaid settlement money’
“With this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Court’s 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that “the effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.” It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the members’ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agency’s failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agency’s failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that “it is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.”
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that “the attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.”
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, “The court has decided to fully accept the creditors’ claims,” adding, “The unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.”"
🔗https://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKGX9DgbsAAoqg1.jpg)
Olivia
Online
😙
@chalsung
love beautiful and talented person
Joined July 2015
561 Following
629 Followers
62.9K Posts
@Ruby_Sherlyy Sopan kah begitu min 🤧🤧🤧
Nanami 🖤🩶🤍
Yacht date HEHHEHE
#じゅじゅプラス 七夢
プロポーズの日
#じゅじゅプラス 七夢 海
(直しまくってたら収集つかなくなってわけがわからなくなってしまったんですがもったいないので載せます🥹)
お仕置きが必要ですね。
i’m so shy to post the whole comic but HEHEHEHEHHE nanami 🤤
七海👔
gue klarifikasi gini bukan buat diri sendiri sih, tapi biar masyarakat melek inituh namanya kegagalan sistem tot ngentot. KENAPA LU PADA DENIAL BANGET SIH KALO BIAYA HIDUP INDONESIA TUH GAK SEBANDING SAMA PENDAPATAN??? LU BAYANGIN AJA UMR TERTINGGI 6JT, HARGA RUMAH STANDART 50OJT
P8 FOR ALBONOOOOOO 🙌🤩
What a race, adding four points to the Championship tally 🇲🇨
Presented by @Atlassian
[NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Made… Court acknowledges ‘unpaid settlement money’
“With this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Court’s 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that “the effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.” It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the members’ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agency’s failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agency’s failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that “it is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.”
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that “the attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.”
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, “The court has decided to fully accept the creditors’ claims,” adding, “The unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.”"
🔗https://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official
![GFS_backup's tweet photo. [NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Made… Court acknowledges ‘unpaid settlement money’
“With this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Court’s 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that “the effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.” It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the members’ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agency’s failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agency’s failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that “it is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.”
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that “the attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.”
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, “The court has decided to fully accept the creditors’ claims,” adding, “The unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.”"
🔗https://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKGYC7Da8AAyQ4c.png)
@AchmadDennise temen ku nonton aespa kmren dan ya konser nya entah lipsing ato gede backtrack gitu kalo denger dari fancam
Yang di Jepang rame mempermasalahkan kalau acara mereka staged
Yang di Indo mempermasalahkan ini beneran dibayar atau engga owkwowkwk😭😭😭 WNI cuma butuh duit....
@mydearestnoona itu sampe kapan ya kakk
gweh akan pake pose cium pipi buat frame ini
@mydearestnoona thx ingpo nya..
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
shawnee FREE OF 🍒
Seen from United Kingdom
NONA
menikmati istri tetangga
Seen from Indonesia
مقاطع نيج عراقي
Pakistan Boys
Seen from Turkey
BULL . pathan
Seen from Pakistan
DAKUS 69
Seen from Philippines
peyuka ibu" dan tante"
Seen from Singapore
سنگل توب 
Seen from Netherlands
Melbourne Boy
Seen from Australia
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
240.2M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
109.1M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.3M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.6M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
86.9M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.7M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.2M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.4M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.7M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.5M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61.2M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60M followers