����BREAKING: Rep. Mary Miller (R-IL) has introduced a resolution to end the official celebration of Pride Month and rename June to Family Month.
"The traditional family is the greatest obstacle to the Left’s cultural agenda ... As America celebrates its 250th anniversary, we should honor and strengthen the nuclear family," @RepMaryMiller told @DailySignal in a statement.
SR 111 labels disagreement with LGBTQ ideology a "phobia," the language of mental illness. Pastors, parents, and doctors with traditional or scientific views are not bigots. @angeliqueashby Senator Ashby Vote NO on #SR111
AB 1854 traps Californians: comply with state law or respond to lawful subpoenas from other states and risk penalties either way. No one should be punished for cooperating with legitimate investigations. @asmnguyen Assembly Member Nguyen Vote NO on #AB1854
Today the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in Foote v. Ludlow, a case that presented a clear and compelling opportunity to protect the fundamental constitutional rights of parents against school policies that secretly transition children without parental knowledge or consent.
As co-counsel for the Foote family — and for the still-pending Littlejohn v. Leon County case — I am disappointed by the Court’s decision not to hear Foote. The case squarely raised the question of whether schools may withhold critical information from parents and override their judgment on matters of their child’s health, well-being, and upbringing.
The Court offered no reasoning for its denial, and it would not be productive to speculate on its thinking. What is undeniable is that the Supreme Court now has one remaining opportunity to provide the nation with clear, final precedent on this issue. Littlejohn v. Leon County is fully briefed on the merits and presents the ideal vehicle for the Court to confirm that parents — not schools — have the constitutionally protected right to direct the upbringing of their children, including decisions involving gender identity and whether their child will be affirmed and raised as their sex at school.
Mirabelli v. Bonta was encouraging, but it was a procedural ruling. Littlejohn offers the Court the chance to address the merits directly and settle the law nationwide.
Regardless of court rulings, Child & Parental Rights Campaign will never stop fighting. We will continue to defend parental rights, protect children’s health from the harms of transgender ideology, and hold schools accountable when they place ideology above family integrity.
Parents are the primary decision-makers for their children. That right is fundamental, bound in natural law, and protected by the Constitution. CPRC will keep fighting until every court in the land recognizes it.
For the Children,
Vernadette Broyles
President / Chief Counsel
Child & Parental Rights Campaign
The America Reads the Bible Opening Celebration has begun. 🇺🇸📖
Join us now and be part of this historic moment.
👉 Watch live on @PureFlix: https://t.co/YYWPhcEr8M
#AmericaReadsTheBible
Weeks after the Supreme Court’s so-called conversion therapy ruling, the debate over therapy and free speech is still unfolding.
The decision found Colorado can’t restrict conversations between therapists and minors based on viewpoint.
Elizabeth Woning of the Changed Movement @changedmvmt says the ruling protects space for people to explore identity, faith, and personal beliefs without government limits. She argues some laws risk narrowing that space to a single approved perspective.
Woning also points to research showing higher rates of adverse childhood experiences among LGBT-identifying individuals, saying those backgrounds can be complex and vary case by case.
In dissent, Ketanji Brown Jackson warned the decision could weaken oversight of licensed professionals.
With similar laws in multiple states, the legal and cultural debate is far from over.
The CA Capitol is sacrificing healthy children to the idol of transgender ideology & calling it compassion.
I believe this is going to go down as one of the biggest medical scandals of my lifetime and CA Democrats in this Capitol are leading the way.
CA Capitol today hosted a hearing “Access to Gender Affirming Care”
We won’t stay silent while harm is being pushed.
The Supreme Court sided with a Christian counselor who challenged a Colorado ban on mental-health counseling that seeks to change young people’s sexual orientation or gender identity. The justices sent the case back to the lower courts. https://t.co/XOSIs5UuOs
We believe all Americans should have the right to talk therapy, not pushed into government mandated sexuality. Conversion therapy bans across the nation openly violate the first amendment, and do so with misguided confidence.
Conversion therapy is discredited junk science that inflicts harm on LGBTQ youth.
The Supreme Court’s decision is disappointing and puts vulnerable kids at risk.
“Conversion therapy” in its lawful definition includes talk therapy that doesn’t affirm a trans identity
This means that until this SCOTUS ruling, psychologists in blue states were forced to participate in the trans delusion
Trans is a mental illness and now it can be treated.
This ruling reinforces something deeply important: people should be free to seek help that aligns with their beliefs, goals, and lived experiences.
No one should be limited in the conversations they can have when pursuing clarity, healing, or personal growth.
Today’s decision creates more space for honest dialogue and compassionate support. #supremecourt #chilesvsalazaar #changedmovement #righttochoose
🚨BIG WIN: The Supreme Court just upheld the First Amendment rights of therapists.
Colorado tried to force counselors to push one viewpoint—affirming gender identity—or risk losing their licenses.
That’s not freedom. That’s coercion.
Therapists must be free to help patients feel comfortable in their own bodies.
VICTORY in Chiles v. Salazar!
Tune to our full breakdown of the decision at 1pm ET!
"Colorado’s law banning conversion therapy, as applied to Ms. Chiles’s talk therapy, regulates speech based on viewpoint, and the lower courts erred by failing to apply sufficiently rigorous First Amendment scrutiny."