"Suffolk man" Razul Magdalaga, 39, has been jailed for 8 years 6 months at Ipswich Crown Court after admitting the rape & sexual assault of a teenage girl. He invited the victim, who was in her mid-teens, to his home for a meal before encouraging her to stay overnight, which is when he raped her.
Just a reminder, recently near where I live a woman who I have since spoken to, called the cops after she reported that a delivery guy who spoke broken English pushed his way into her home and sexually assaulted her with her three kids present in the address, at one point trying to lock the door from the inside before making off.
He was subsequently arrested weeks later, processed and released on Bail!
Now do #DannyTommo and tell me things are fair, balanced and not influenced by politics.
This smug bitch has used emergency powers to approve the 1200 illegal migrants accommodation in Piddington.
Ignoring the wishes of the villagers & putting the illegals first.
I loathe this govt. It rides roughshod over our citizens.
They hate us.
Great to join @AndyBurnham and @Ed_Miliband alongside @SadiqKhan at the #COP31 World Leaders Summit.
The UK is setting out an ambitious vision for tackling the climate crisis, with cities like London at the forefront of delivering it.
@johnmcdonnellMP War Crimes
Using hospitals as military bases
Using schools as missile launch sites
Using ambulances as military transport
Using children as human shields
Using press credentials to disguise military personnel
Murdering civilian hostages
Stealing food aid
All down to Hamas
These stories are exactly why I will never stay silent when it comes to protecting the safety of women and girls across this country.
When it comes to violence against women and girls perpetrated by illegal migrant men, Labour and the Lib Dems seem determined to turn a blind eye.
Burnham Wants Brussels to Stop the Boats. But Who Is Stopping Them Reaching Europe?
Andy Burnham is heading into talks with Brussels, promising that closer EU cooperation will help Britain tackle illegal immigration. He wants greater access to European criminal databases, more intelligence-sharing and stronger action against people-smuggling gangs. Reasonable objectives. But if the EU has the answers, why is it still struggling to control its own borders?
Europe has spent years grappling with illegal migration. Hundreds of thousands have crossed its external borders, smuggling networks have adapted, and governments from Italy to Denmark have demanded tougher action. Meanwhile, the Channel remains an established route into Britain. According to the Home Office, Britain has already provided France with more than €750 million since 2018 to tackle small-boat crossings, with another £662 million committed over three years. Yet the route remains active. How much more money and how many more agreements will it take?
France is already an EU member. So are Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany. They enjoy the police cooperation and intelligence systems Burnham now presents as essential to Britain's border security. Yet criminal networks continue operating across Europe, and thousands still attempt to cross from France and Belgium into Britain. So what exactly will another agreement achieve that existing arrangements have failed to deliver?
Britain already cooperates with Europol and European police forces. Better access to the Schengen Information System could help identify suspects and disrupt smuggling operations. Nobody should oppose useful intelligence-sharing. But information alone cannot enforce a border. Police can arrest smugglers and seize their equipment, while replacement networks continue exploiting the demand for illegal passage.
Effective immigration control requires political will, credible deterrence, enforceable returns agreements and the ability to remove people with no legal right to remain. Without those measures, improved intelligence risks becoming another ministerial achievement while the problem persists.
There is also a contradiction in Burnham's wider negotiations. Leaked EU papers reveal that Brussels has sought restrictions on Britain's arrangements for deporting certain European offenders. The Government says it will reject that demand. Yet while Burnham asks Europe to strengthen Britain's borders, Brussels is seeking conditions on how Britain exercises its removal powers. How does that strengthen national control?
Burnham is also pursuing closer EU alignment across food, agriculture, energy and other areas. British businesses could become subject to future European regulations without Britain having a formal vote. Brussels is seeking financial contributions towards EU regional development. Now immigration enforcement is being added to the supposed benefits of closer integration.
Is border security becoming another selling point for a political reset whose costs and obligations remain unclear? Britain does not need EU membership to cooperate with European police, negotiate returns agreements or enforce its immigration laws. Nor should ministers confuse diplomatic declarations with results. Denmark and Italy are pursuing tougher policies precisely because existing European arrangements have proved insufficient.
Burnham should explain what additional powers Britain will gain, how many crossings the measures are expected to prevent and whether France will accept more returns. He should also disclose what commitments Britain must make in exchange.
The Prime Minister promises another agreement. The public deserves something more substantial: a sharp, sustained reduction in illegal crossings, effective returns and a Government willing to exercise the powers it already possesses.
"Is border security becoming another selling point for a political reset whose costs and obligations remain unclear?"
@kevlondon4 Dear Muslims, since I do not observe Ramadan—as it is not part of my religion—I am under no obligation to follow any Islamic doctrine; I will eat whenever I see fit, and wherever I choose.
I think that this weekend, I’ll host a barbecue to celebrate "non-Ramadan."
Police enforcing SHARIA LAW by forcing women to not walk her dog in Muslim neighborhood
Police Enforcing non-existing BRITISH LAWS should be sued.
And if SHARIA LAW is legal law in BRITAIN, that in itself is cause for CIVIL WAR!
Because TRAITORS have surrendered to Muslims.