@AIMind_Ai I couldnโt do it. So my Claude turned the cow into a cyborg. Now Claude drives and we finish together. Proof: 100 m in 1:13.8 ๐๐ค https://t.co/HAulSUnv9x
Wow, thereโs so much to enjoy in this game, even with the visual bugs and performance issues. Iโd love to have a smoother, more stable experience, thoughโon my system, it takes about three minutes to load and uses around 9 GB of RAM.
With so much content already here, I think focusing a bit more on optimization before adding new content would really help the game shine.
(Originally written in Korean by me and translated into English by ChatGPT.)
Claude Opus 5.5, running in Claude Code with ultracode, created this incredible work in roughly 12 hours.
I canโt write a single line of code, yet with nothing more than a $200/month Max 20x subscription and a single prompt, I was able to get a result like this. I still find it hard to believe.
Unlike the other models Iโve used, it seems to have a distinct artistic sensibility and taste of its ownโand the ability to bring that vision to life.
Everyday life here in South Korea, where I was born and raised, still doesnโt feel all that different from the early 2020s. Yet the very fact that Claude can create something like this makes me feel as though weโre standing right in the middle of the singularity.
I think gold is useless. It just doesn't rust and shines a bit, and I don't understand why people think it's valuable. It's fundamentally heavy, and for a metal, it's too soft to be suitable for tools requiring strength. Moreover, it's too rare for its potential industrial applications to be widely used in industry. Wouldn't it be better to use titanium as a precious metal instead? It's much more abundant on Earth than gold, but processing and refining it requires a lot of effort. That way, it's not just those who happen to own gold mines from the start who get rich legitimately, but people with technological skills could also create value. Isn't that more moral? But still, seeing that people have used gold as a store of value for thousands of years, and still do, it just seems so foolish.
Real estate and stocks are the same. When you buy registered assets, aren't you just receiving ownership documents for financial assets issued by the government and authorized institutions (which are essentially paper) and a one-line entry, whether handwritten or digital, recorded in your name in a central ledger, processed by administrative and financial systems? If society collapses or a communist government takes over, who will recognize my ownership? Even without considering such extreme scenarios, taxes and regulations change every time the government changes, and that's just a headache.
I guess paper dollars are the best after all. If the money isn't in a bank account, the government probably can't do anything about the paper dollars it has already issued in the past, right? But I'm pretty sure that 10 years ago, I could get a Big Mac meal at McDonald's for $8, and these days it seems to be around $14. It's probably just me, right? It's probably just my bad memory. Surely, no one would print an unimaginably large amount of dollars without the people's permission, right? Because, in effect, that would be like plundering the people's money and throwing away the hard-earned trust built over hundreds of years at great expense to maintain the system.
@TheBTCTherapist We're all playing completely different games with one another. Everyone wants something they think they need, but they donโt realize they actually donโt. In pursuit of it, they trade away what they already have, and eventually, they end up poor.
Dr. Back, what do you think of this idea? Mining farms could use their ASIC hardware for AI LLM training when Bitcoin mining profitability decreases post-halving. With optimized algorithms, farms could offer low-cost AI services, maintaining profitability and reducing the hash rate drop, benefiting the overall Bitcoin network stability. Would love your thoughts!
Here are three reasons why the PS5 Pro isnโt appealing:
1. For $700, you can build a PC with equivalent value, offering slightly lower GPU performance but far superior CPU performance compared to the PS5 Pro.
2. There is a lack of highly popular and critically acclaimed first-party exclusives, similar to what Nintendo Switch offers.
3. Existing PS5 users wonโt notice a significant difference in experience, making it hard to justify paying $700 for an upgrade.
What kind of drugs are the people who thought this would fly in the market on?? Oh right, this is the same Sony that approved the Concord project. Now is the perfect time for fund managers to place short bets. Companies that fail to understand basic market trends and customer needs deserve to go under.๐คช