Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming.
At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand.
Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models.
The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends.
This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.
Some people suggest that while green is expensive, the benefits are much greater
Well, no:
The benefit of net-zero is $4.5 trillion/year, but the cost $27 trillion
(much larger costs and benefits, because we're currently only doing a bit of net-zero currently)
https://t.co/j4wG0vrxJB
You can see all the references in my Twitter thread:
https://t.co/HfBtBL2mlK
How to manufacture a crisis:
A WHO commission wants to declare climate change a “global health emergency.”
Their big evidence? Rising heat deaths in Europe.
But once you adjust for an ageing society, the “crisis” essentially disappears.
Even more dishonestly, the report conceals that cold deaths have declined by approximately 250 times as much as heat deaths have risen.
https://t.co/8T5c9Hmesh
@mzjacobson So does moving the world to 100% renewables mean you have an electric aeroplane and some electric cargo ships available? Oh plus electric fertiliser and electric plastic packaging?
@RuzzyCarhole@mzjacobson So if there is plenty of evidence that what we’re doing makes a difference why do I keep seeing climate alarmists make ridiculous predictions about rising sea levels and global boiling. It’s all nonsense.
@MarkCranfield_ Even assuming he’s right why do you want to stop global warming? More people die from cold than heat and species would adapt as they have for millennia. This scaremongering about sea levels is obvious nonsense, back in 2004 they said there would be no polar ice caps in 20 years.
@simonmaechling Like no true placebos publishing relative rather than absolute risk reduction, eliminating adverse results like Maddie De Garay and attempting to seal trial results for 75 years in court? It’s not lack of explanation it’s eliminating corruption that’s needed for public confidence
@simonmaechling Surely you’re not saying that ALL vaccines work regardless of the composition? Also there’s a massive difference between ingesting mRNA / DNA and injecting it into your muscles and bloodstream as you should know. Your body has defences for that kind of thing.
@cain_rob@simonmaechling Probably right, you don’t want certainty challenged by uncomfortable evidence. As someone once said “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.”