charlesian2000

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@Mishi_2210 Why, it’s a simple progression double plus one

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@HumanRights4A @AlboMP I think the 13 year old he stabbed should have a say in Mohamed’s fate.

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@GaryFallon2 What the hell???? No fucking way do I want that incompetent idiot being anywhere near my comms

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@jasonprogress99 @3minutehero @atalanta44 @WJ23A @australian Btw, thanks for the insult, way to win Yes votes.

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@jasonprogress99 @3minutehero @atalanta44 @WJ23A @australian I know this referendum is basically asking that the government be allowed to create the voice after getting a Yes.

The voice has not been designed, therefore the voice currently has no limits.

This also goes against all Australians being equal.

Show me something.

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@jasonprogress99 @atalanta44 @WJ23A @australian I’m sorry, but I’m not going to vote on a principle, when it comes to the constitution.

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@jasonprogress99 @atalanta44 @WJ23A @australian Wow, I wouldn’t bring America into this.

I don’t care which other country can do it, I just want details.

You’d get a Yes, if there were more transparency.

Details.

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@VWHawkesbury @australian I have no problems voting Yes, as long as I know what I’m voting for.

The Yes campaign could turn it around, if they gave details.

That’s what needs to happen.

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@VoteLewko @9NewsAUS Get your hand off my penis!

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@JasonClareMP Talking about tax, how about taxing big business fairly?

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@JEChalmers @GCBulletin So what you are saying is that without constitutional change, the current government is ineffective?

As it stands I need details, changing the constitution isn’t a trivial consideration.

The Yes campaign needs to give details.

You’ll get more Yes if you spell it out

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@JennyHaines19 @australian The problem is the lack of details.

I’m not going to vote Yes unless I know what I’m voting for.

Do you know?

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@jasonprogress99 @atalanta44 @WJ23A @australian This is hardly a clear cut case.

What exactly would I be voting for?

No one has been able to answer.

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@digitalFTTP I’m not a liberal party voter, what you talking about?

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@robjac01 @australian @AlboMP @PeterDutton_MP The big problem, is uncertainty.

If the Australian voting public don’t know what they are voting for, chances are they won’t vote for it.

“No” would be more beneficial, because guilt would force the government to do what they were voted in to do.

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@VWHawkesbury @australian The government already has the power to improve aboriginal lives. We don’t need a constitutional change for that.

If the Yes campaign were more transparent, or at least better thought out, it may get more traction.

The government should do better, we voted them in for that.

[charlesian2000 @charlesian2000]

@ashton_book @australian Good reply.

A lot of people don’t get this.

If “No” succeeds there will be protest marches. If “Yes” succeeds there will be no protest marches.

It’s being pushed that if you vote “No”, you’re a racist, opposed to wanting to know what “Yes” actually means.