@christislord@TomFitton You smack of being somewhat racist? What does it matter? 30 to 40 people beat up 3! Best scenario, it never should have happened. Do you think alcohol was involved or do we not go there?
@FixinYourUglies @CalltoActivism If you are not able to discern and or verify the facts from fiction then why vote at all? I don't believe the news has to absolutely prove everything they report on. BUT, if they are going to tell only one side of a story then it should be mandated that that is a one sided story
@maspina63@JoJoFromJerz As I am sure others have said: he and both parties still voted 3× to raise the debt ceiling under Trump. Nothing to see here?????
@FixinYourUglies @CalltoActivism Much ado about nothing! Agree to disagree then VOTE the way you wish to vote. Why does anyone care which way a station "leans" as long as you think, verify, educate and follow your own path. If a news station doesn't meet your expectations, then by all means change the channel.
@bennyjohnson What on earth were you watching? You must have put up the wrong excerpt of Andersen, because there is absolutely nothing in it of what you say. Or mabey you are drinking too much koolaid?
@CromerKelli@biddy15@OccupyDemocrats CNN owes no one an apology or a correction. They just put on a program that allowed the viewer to THINK independantly.
@biddy15@OccupyDemocrats Now I read some common sense here. CNN merely gave Trump another platform to display his real personality with several bonus 'duhs' expressed by him. My opinion is that he came across worse than ever. Nothing will change his zombie followers but I think Independants heard a lot.
@CalltoActivism Just thought of another takeaway. Is this entire ruse of firing people at CNN an AI or a Right wing ploy at using CNN as a scapegoat to shield the truth from discerning voters? Post this and let's see how many people of thought respond. Tick, tick, tick.
@CalltoActivism Absolutely not. I watched the episode and had three takeaways. Kaitlin Collins did an incredible job. Trump continued to or perhaps exposed more of the reasons we should not elect him. The last thing; the majority of the audience would simply follow him off a cliff, so sad! THINK
@FrankMikeDavis1 Well yes, yes I do. How else can she be exposed to those that don't watch the regular day to day shenanigans she performs or speaks to. There are people out there that may only watch 60 minutes.
@realTuckFrumper Quite frankly, I watched the program and thought it was a very methodical tearing down of MTG. Of course more could have been done in the way of sensationalism. That would only give a boost to MTG's way of dealing with things. The cool calm approach, exposed her much more so.