@IamTheFawb@kasratweets Insofar as those processes are particular to the substrate, sure. Much like the pen and paper. Abstracted from the substrate it is clear that computers can produce speech and language. If you refuse any abstraction, then, that's that. You're not engaging with the issue at all.
@IamTheFawb@kasratweets The way that ink percolates through paper as one writes with a pen is also too complex for a computer to replicate but that was not necessary in order for us to correspond. Our computers only needed to have a text encoding adequate for our shared alphabet.
@NateSilver538 It is a very good signal. Since Platner had a totenkopf tattoo and shared posts from white supremacists, one could suspect that a disgruntled ex-staffer may have further evidence of his sympathies toward the far-right. However, the staffer was only able to leak old flirty texts.
@IranianIntifada@GMomurder Claude Code using Opus 4.6. These kinds of screw-ups aren't substantial when I am in the loop to correct them, but as they happen daily to me I wonder how people are getting LLMs to work autonomously.