Hypothesis:
Nazar or hexing is real
so talk about your plans only when talking about them will attract relevant collaboration, else they are better off not being talked about
@prathmeshh_ Opposition still has states under its rule, they need to set a good example of governance their and showcase it to the people of India through results, not rhetoric.
The government needs to be kept in check. That’s the whole point of democracy and this responsibility resides with opposition, ask the right questions, stand up for the people of India, and demonstrate through their own governance that they can do better.
That’s what the BJP managed to do before 2014. Its performance and governance in states where it held power helped it present itself as an alternative at the national level. The opposition needs to do the same today.
Deliver results in the states it governs, build public trust, and show the rest of India what its vision looks like in practice, rather than just coming onto streets.
Because questioning the government is only one part of the job. The other is proving that you can govern better.
Otherwise a party with a vision is better than an one whose only goal is to bring down the ruling party, without any proof that they will govern better.
Okay, then judge the government on its promises and performance. Has it delivered?
Are you satisfied with how it is running the country?
If your answer is No, why vote for them?
You don’t have to become a Congress/AAP/etc supporter to question BJP. You don’t have to love another party to give it a chance.
You should never be a blind supporter of any party.
Your loyalty should be to the country and your own future.
Whoever don't work, change them.
I know, changing a government doesn’t guarantee things will improve. But telling those in power “whatever you do, I’ll still vote for you” removes the pressure to improve.
You have every right to demand better and choose differently. That is not hatred for any party. That is accountability.
And accountability should be asked from the ruling party.
They have all the money, they have all the resources, they have all the power. If they still can't work, change them.
Just because the opposition is weak we cannot keep supporting an existing failed government.
can you give me a evidence, that they are doing better in there own states, and let's not say mr. rahul gandhi needs a chance, before has he proven himself?? to be a PM of india?
I'm not even sayin that, i wanna see him in governing position in state, he's in governing position as his party leader, has the party been able to do a better job at governance in there own states?
congress has my vote, if they are able to prove that in numbers, and not some delusional arguments.
that's a dumb idea, do you realise changing a regime each take the nation back a few years and waste our hard payed taxes, the policies and large scale projects setup by current regime, mostly get stalled by the next gov, and when even is the regime comes back the projects and policy don't leave the impact they should've in the first place.
I'm not voting for a party, if they aren't giving me a good evidence that they can govern better in there.
It would be better to build on what already exists rather than tear everything down just to rebuild it from scratch.
India has gone through so many upheavals since the 1990s. And believe it or not, constantly dismantling existing systems before building new ones is an incredibly inefficient way to develop a nation.
China is an interesting example of what sustained, long-term development and continuity can achieve.
Progress doesn't always mean starting over. Sometimes, it's about improving what exists, fixing what doesn't, and building on the foundations already laid, tearing down is not the way.