George Tsigarides

[Noah B. Price @TrueOnX]

🚨 HOLY SH*T! They Banned The Plant
That Could Build Fireproof, Rot-Proof, Carbon-Negative Houses…
and now it’s Back 🚨

And it's made from...

This is hempcrete
made from hemp + lime.

It doesn’t burn, doesn’t rot, regulates humidity, sequesters CO2, and lasts centuries.

In the 1930s they taxed hemp into oblivion right as DuPont rolled out nylon and plastics.

Coincidence?

Now it’s legal again.

Why aren’t we building
with this everywhere?

Would YOU live
in a hempcrete house?

Would this solve the housing crisis + climate goals at the same time?

Why isn’t every new build using it?

Let me know what you think,
and SHARE THIS so that others may too.

And if you're not already following
@TrueOnX...
What the heck are you doing?!

[Lucy Connolly @LucyTCWife]

This is because our current system does not work!
I can not shout this loud enough!

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Graham Moore 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @englishexit]

The Full English Show tonight 8pm live.

https://t.co/AahmgeDEIA

Statement of fact and argument of a Free Subject of the English Realm.

I speak as a free subject of this realm, claiming the rights that the original law and contract itself declared to be mine.

The common law of England has never admitted the Roman maxim of desuetude to do so would be a subversion of the Laws of England. Statutes and declared rights do not wither, lapse, or lose force through the mere passage of time, non-use, or contrary practice. Continuity is the very essence of the common law: what was law remains law until it is lawfully altered according to the forms that the law itself provides. This rejection of desuetude is the foundation upon which the ancient rights of the subject stand unbroken.

Because desuetude has no place, the rights declared in the Act of 1689 remain of the same force and effect as the day they were enacted.

That Act is titled “An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown.” It declares the rights therein set forth to be “the true, ancient and indubitable rights and liberties of the people of this kingdom, and so shall be esteemed, allowed, adjudged, deemed and taken to be.” It commands that “all and every the particulars aforesaid shall be firmly and strictly holden and observed as they are expressed in the said declaration, and all officers and ministers whatsoever shall serve their Majesties and their successors according to the same in all time to come.” And it enacts that the whole “shall stand, remain and be the law of this realm for ever.”

The Act of Settlement of 1701, titled “An Act for the further Limitation of the Crown and better securing the Rights and Liberties of the Subject,” confirms and ratifies the same. It states that “the Laws of England are the Birthright of the People thereof and all the Kings and Queens who shall ascend the Throne of this Realm ought to administer the Government of the same according to the said Laws and all their Officers and Ministers ought to serve them respectively according to the same.” The birthright of the people cannot be extinguished by the passage of years or by later instruction that pretends the opposite.

Section III of the Bill of Rights provides that “no charter or grant or pardon granted before the three and twentieth day of October in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred eighty-nine shall be any ways impeached or invalidated by this Act, but that the same shall be and remain of the same force and effect in law.” Magna Carta is such a charter. It declares that no free man shall be arrested, imprisoned, disseised, outlawed, exiled, or otherwise destroyed, nor proceeded against, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land, and that to no one will right or justice be sold, refused, or delayed. This is the observance of the law of the land that remains law. It forms part of the birthright of the people and stands protected forever.

Section II of the Bill of Rights enacts that “no dispensation by non obstante of or to any statute or any part thereof shall be allowed, but that the same shall be held void and of no effect.” In a legal order that rejects desuetude, this clause confirms that the declared rights cannot be sidestepped by executive pretence or by any claim of obsolescence.

What is void remains void.

The Coronation Oath binds every King and Queen to govern the people of this kingdom according to the statutes in Parliament agreed on and the laws and customs of the same. The rights declared in 1689, the laws confirmed in 1701, and the ancient charters protected by Section III are among those statutes, laws, and customs. The Oath therefore requires their observance. The Crown must either assent or refuse; it cannot abstain. Yet the original texts forbid any assent that would set aside the rights that are to be firmly and strictly holden in all time to come and for ever.

To pretend that Parliament could enact a law that went against these undoubted rights is to deny the original contract between the Crown and the people, as recognised in the constitutional settlement itself. Any monarch who assented to such a law would thereby perjure the Coronation Oath and forfeit the Crown, for the Oath requires government according to the statutes, laws, and customs that include these perpetual rights. Any judge who ruled to the contrary would perjure their own oath to do justice according to the law, and would fail to advise the King properly. Such counsellors and judges would become the very essence of those condemned in the preamble to the Bill of Rights: the “various* evil counsellors, judges and ministers” by whose assistance the late King James the Second did endeavour to subvert the laws and liberties of this kingdom.
*The original word was “divers” which is archaic English and today means “various” or “several.”

Taken together, these original texts produce a single, unbroken conclusion. The rights of the subject are not temporary privileges that may be redefined, suspended, or allowed to fall into disuse. They are ancient, indubitable, and perpetual. They are the birthright of the people. They bind the Crown, the officers, and the ministers in all time to come. Because the common law refuses the maxim of desuetude, no amount of later teaching, professional instruction, or state practice can lawfully erase them. Any claim that these rights have somehow become alterable or optional is a departure from the original settlement itself.

I therefore claim and insist upon these rights as my birthright. They stand for ever. They are to be firmly and strictly holden and observed by all who govern or serve under the Crown. Any law, dispensation, or proceeding that stands outside these protections is void and of no effect by the original force of the texts themselves. The subjects of the realm stand upon the law as it was declared, strictly holden, and secured forever.

By using the words and phrasing forever, all time to come and various sections forbidding change – the original contract expressed that desuetude shall not have any effect on these laws or rights. In fact, a Scottish court that acknowledged A.V. Dicey’s thoughts on this.

The case is MacCormick v Lord Advocate 1953 SC 396 (also reported as 1953 SLT 255). In the course of the case the Lord Advocate "conceded" that the Parliament of the United Kingdom “could not” repeal or alter certain “fundamental and essential” conditions of the Treaty/Acts of Union 1707.

Every English child should be taught this in School. The UK Parliament cannot subvert, abrogate or repeal any English law.

@SecretPeopleTSP @WhiteHouse @SecRubio @gabby_cabby

[“Sudden And Unexpected” @toobaffled]

Remember when a goat, a papaya, and tap water all tested positive for COVID?
They fell for it, hook, line, and needle. 💉 😂

[Mark Attwood @MarkAttwood]

Fuck chemo.

On behalf of all my family members murdered by the Rockefeller/cabal bullshit medical “system”. I hate you with a vengeance.

[George Tsigarides @cheekie10]

https://t.co/RJrz2IDuSj

[EMR STOP @EMRStop]

A 2026 systematic review led by Meike Mevissen, commissioned by the WHO and published in Environment International, found evidence linking RF radiation to cancer in animals. It became the journal’s most-downloaded paper of 2025 with ~28,000 downloads
https://t.co/Ln1NH9Hvmv

[Mark Attwood @MarkAttwood]

In this video you will see a car running on hydrogen - the hydrogen was created from the sun and river on James Conways farm in Sligo, Ireland.

I think Tesla should give them a bell? @elonmusk

[M. Todd Trebony, MD FAAC @TheSingingDoc]

😔

[Christine P. @ChristinePP27]

sergio_doc_
Les ROTHSCHILDS viennent de commencer à prendre le contrôle du temps.

Depuis 47 ans, ils contrôlent le ciel grâce à un réseau de 22 stations de modification météorologique qui pourraient diriger ouragans, sécheresses, inondations et tremblements de terre, sur demande, vers n'importe quel endroit sur Terre.
Le programme a été appelé « TRÔNE CLIMATE » et a été financé par un labyrinthe d'ONG, de systèmes de crédit carbone et de fondations « énergie verte », qui sont toutes reliées au même bureau familial à Genève qui contrôle les banques européennes depuis 1815. Il y a quelques jours, la dernière station a été déconnectée, saisie par une opération militaire impliquant 6 nations qui n'ont jamais publiquement reconnu travailler ensemble. Le temps n'est plus une arme. Pour la première fois depuis 1979, le ciel n'appartient à personne. Chaque "catastrophe naturelle" des 47 dernières années avait une signature, une empreinte digitale incrustée dans l'ionosphère qui l'a précédée. Les chercheurs du HAARP le détectent depuis des décennies. Ils ont été ridiculisés, mais ils avaient raison sur tout : Ouragan Katrina : trace de fréquence détectée 72 heures avant l'impact ; Le tremblement de terre en Haïti de 2010 a la même signature de fréquence, venant d'une station au Venezuela ; Le tremblement de terre de 2011, signature attribuée à un navire opérant dans le Pacifique sans drapeau. L'immatriculation du navire, obtenue par "QFS maritime tracking", appartient à une compagnie commodément située aux îles Caïmanes. L'unique directeur de l'entreprise : une fiducie familiale de la famille Rothschild.
Ils n'avaient pas prévu de catastrophes, ils les ont ordonnés. Pourquoi contrôler la météo ? Parce que la météo contrôle tout. Prix des denrées alimentaires, marchés des assurances, stabilité gouvernementale, systèmes de migration, résultats des élections. Ils n'avaient pas besoin d'armée. Ils n'avaient pas besoin de meurtres. Ils avaient besoin de pluie ou de sécheresse au bon endroit au bon moment. 4.2 billions de dollars en dommages de « catastrophe naturelle » depuis 1979. Parier sur la destruction qu'ils ont créée. Recueillir la souffrance qu'ils ont provoquée. Pour la première fois en un demi-siècle, la pluie tombera là où elle devrait tomber. #JulianAssange #tronoclimatico

[Bohemian Atmosphere @BohemianAtmosp1]

Not so crazy now are we?

“Nearly half a million Britons claim to have suffered from side effects from the Covid jab, analysis of official figures reveals.
Over 2,500 people have submitted reports claiming that a family member has died as a result of the jab.”

[Lucy Connolly @LucyTCWife]

Prison won’t be kind to these two scumbags.

[George Tsigarides @cheekie10]

https://t.co/uKWYS9UxGJ

[Lucy Connolly @LucyTCWife]

I defy any of you to defend that body cam footage and those police officers!!

I have had my own issues with the police over the years, but this, this is a whole new level.

If you can watch that and not be utterly ashamed of the police force and what this country has become, you’re subhuman.

That poor boy and his poor family. 💔💔💔

[George Tsigarides @cheekie10]

https://t.co/HoKCfk82tY

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Graham Moore 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @englishexit]

I DO NOT CONSENT Ashby v white 1703

[George Tsigarides @cheekie10]

https://t.co/rE9ZZqI6kT

[George Tsigarides @cheekie10]

https://t.co/0MoROiViAG

[George Tsigarides @cheekie10]

https://t.co/GimHbMCNIA

[George Tsigarides @cheekie10]

https://t.co/5KSj1XVhCb